Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
December 31, 2007 at 07:55:28

View Ratings | Rate It

Ron Paul: a Means to an End

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Alfred Jones, Posted by Alfred Jones (about the submitter)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Posted by Alfred Jones - Writer

Let me be clear: Ron Paul is the only viable peace candidate in the presidential race. He has the money, he has the organization on the ground in the early primary states, he has the buzz, the press coverage, and the momentum to win the Republican nomination. Most importantly, he has the platform to unite perceived enemies behind the same message of peace, liberty, and prosperity. . . But in order to do that, he's going to need some help from some unlikely places, namely us, the liberal/progressive end of the democratic party.

Why should we support him?

Because he has the message that we have been waiting for. Ron Paul has done more to convince conservatives that the war is an immoral failure than 5 years of 'raising consciousness' has been able to achieve. Ron Paul's stance on the war, on the military-industiral complex, and on American foreign-policy in general is a peace activist's wet dream. And yet he still has the Republican credentials to reach across the aisle and pick up a large contingent of support from hardcore conservaties. He has the right blend of positions to make him palatable--though not totally acceptalbe--to people from across the entire band of the political spectrum. What excites me most about his candidacy, though, is not only his ability to draw from both sides, but his principled and fearless stance on War as an instrument of policy and his advocacy for the protection of civil liberties.

He publicly says that we need to withdraw from Iraq as soon as possible. . . and Afghanistan, and Korea, and Japan, and Europe. He publicly says that the military-industrial complex has too much sway in American politics and foreign policy. He publicly says that preemptive war is not just bad, but morally abhorrent. In fact, he said at a Republican debate that the number one moral problem facing America in the 21st century is our society's acceptance of aggressive war as a just and reasonable instrument of foreign policy. Not teenage sex. Not abortion. Not homosexual marriage. This man is not your average Republican.

But it doesn't stop there. Ron Paul is also concerned about our growing surveillance/police state. He was willing to say on Meet the Press last Sunday that America is on the verge of Fascism. He wants to repeal the Real ID act, the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions act, and the Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act. He consistently rails agains the excessive secrecy of the Bush Administration and against their blatant attacks on our civil liberties through wiretapping, suspension of habeus corpus, torture, rendition, and the implementation of a national ID card. Don't you wish Obama would start talking about those issues?

On Iraq, foreign policy in general, and the erosion of civil liberties Ron Paul is far to the left of the major democratic contenders. Only Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel match him on these ardent stances, and they have been marginalized to the point of extinction.

But a curious thing happened with Ron Paul. The media played its normal game and tried to marginalize him, but try as they might they couldn't get rid of him. He kept working his way into news by his fundraising, and the audacity and ingenuity of his followers. His donor base is 250,000 wide for the fourth quarter alone meaning that even though he has managed to raise almost $19 million (an astounding amount for a 'second-tier' candidate with 'crackpot' ideas) his average donation size is still only $76, showing that his money is not funneled from corporate interests but amassed in small increments by people excited by his message.

Ron Paul is single-handedly bringing into the national discussion issues about aggressive war, preemption, surveillance, civil liberties, and America's stance in the world that liberal activists have been trying to get into the public consciousness for years. Even if he doesn't win, it's worthwhile to support him just so that he can continue to speak on national television about the CIA overthrow of Iran in 1953, the Real ID act, and the fact that America has become an empire, plain and simple.

In short, Ron Paul has the message on war and on civil liberties that all but the most centrist democrats long for, and yet he has still managed to break through into the mainstream. Next to Ron Paul, Clinton, Obama and Edwards look like Neocons willing to suppress domestic dissent in order to wage aggressive wars to secure foreign oil. In my view, this is the first time that such an ardent anti-war candidate has risen to prominence since Bobby Kennedy.

This is the moment we have been waiting for. This is the man we have been waiting for. Ron Paul has the potential to dismantle the military-industrial complex and all the attendent lobbyist corruption that comes with it, end foreign wars, and restore the Bill of Rights to relevance in one fell swoop. But he's not going to do it on his own. He's going to need our help.

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Book Recommendations for " American Facism"
Liberal Facism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change
by Jonah Goldberg

$89.98

Number of pages: 496
Publisher: Doubleday; 1 edition

NATIVE AMER FACISM DURING 1930 (Modern American History)
by Schonbach

$15.00

Number of pages: 507
Publisher: Dissertations-G

Facism and citizenship.-- (Weil Lectures on American citizenship)
by George Norlin


Number of pages: 108
Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press

Journalist aims to expose 'facism' of Christian right.(Nation): An article from: National Catholic Reporter
by Rebecca Beyer

$5.95

Number of pages: 3
Publisher: National Catholic Reporter

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Ron Paul for President by Chris Schuman on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 8:23:44 AM
Why choose Ron Paul? by John Haigh on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 9:50:24 AM
Yes, let's look at Ron Paul! by Mary Pitt on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:40:51 AM
A Few Quick Curiosities by Gigi Bowman on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:58:05 AM
Talk about a superficial evaluation! by Ed Menken on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 1:15:10 PM
Oh please... by fou on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 2:01:42 PM
actually by Ingrid on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 5:10:34 PM
link not ink by Ingrid on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 5:12:26 PM
NOT 'just what we need' BUT 'just what's happening!' by Oliver Steinberg on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 3:49:41 PM
THIS is what's important by Louis Nardozi on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 5:16:51 PM
Beware A "Means to an End" by R. Queisser on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 7:45:54 PM
Ron Paul would take Dennis Kucinich, too. by Oliver Steinberg on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 8:45:58 PM
Counterpoints to comments by posters Pitt and Menken: by t quigly on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 9:07:40 PM
Protest Rupert Murdoch's Exclusion of Ron Paul At Fox News F by Ron Holland on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 12:08:40 PM
Don't misunderstand Ron Paul ! by Christopher Witmer on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 6:06:13 PM
Troop withdrawl by rp haigh on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 10:13:23 PM
Thank you by Ingrid on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 1:29:52 PM
Unplugging the welfare state means plugging in people by Christopher Witmer on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 7:08:56 PM
Troop withdrawal from Japan and Korea would be welcomed by Christopher Witmer on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 6:42:17 PM
Thanks by rp haigh on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 9:12:01 PM
Rand and current disciples are PRO-intervention:anti-Paul by Less on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 7:09:07 PM
Prissy Progressives by Lawrence Cook on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 7:45:20 PM
Your one chance, Americans! by Vendelwalker on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 5:36:16 PM
Thanks for the support from Sweden by Christopher Witmer on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 7:11:57 PM
Very well reasoned article! by JimInNY on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 7:15:41 PM
Ron Paul -- only true anti-war candidate by michael ketcher on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 7:40:13 PM
Network This NOW! by Darin Walker on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 1:13:07 PM
Paul supporters by Ty on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 11:31:22 AM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum