Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (59 comments)

The Great Democratic Landslide Of 2008

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


Democrats 2008 Sweep


George Bush will go down in history as the new Herbert Hoover for the Republican Party, creating momentous changes in American politics that will lead to a realignment as powerful as the FDR coalition.

Democrats have an extraordinary opportunity in 2007 and 2008 to lead the Nation to a post- Bush America and inaugurate a new era of historic patriotic reform in the tradition of FDR and JFK.

Our great aspiration is that January 2009 will bring a new Democratic President leading an uplifted America, with up to 60 Democratic Senators, additional gains in the House, and a wave of more Democratic governors ahead of the next census and reapportionment.

I served with senior Democratic Senators such as Lloyd Bentsen and with the House Democratic Leadership when Democrats were in control of Congress and have no doubt about this:

Democrats have only begun to realize the full magnitude of rejection of Bush and Bushism, the full magnitude of our power in Congress to set the agenda through legislation and investigations, and the full magnitude of opportunity in 2008 for a historic realignment. Republicans are politically incarcerated by a politics of Bushism that is dominated by an extreme right wing base, a royalist economics that makes them servants of the 1% at the expense of the 99%, and a psychology of national division, fear politics and war fever.

The traditional base of the Democratic Party is converging with the mainstream base of Middle America.

Fighting Democrats and war hero candidates appeal to tens of millions of Americans in military families who know well the bad faith and incompetence of Bush war fever and war partisanship.

The demographic wave of Hispanics is cresting with the Democratic wave of community that treats all Americans as members of the great American family.

As Baby Boomers gravitate to older age groups that tend to favor Democrats, young people are gravitating to Democrats who will not rush to send our young to war, who will stand for social justice and economic opportunity for everyone, and who want to protect our planet from the greed and pollution that threatens the world our young people will inherit.

The poor, the underprivileged, the victims of Bushism are regaining a spirit of empowerment as they saw that their vote really mattered last November, and a Democratic Congress fights for them. The age of tax cuts for the wealthiest is over; the fight for minimum wage has begun, and will be won.

Men and women of faith are attracted by Democratic candidates who believe with President Kennedy that God's work on earth must truly be our own, and act on this belief.

There is a growing movement among mainstream and progressive religious denominations who are roused to action against the politics of selfishness, greed and corruption that are hallmarks of the Bush era.

Even the most conservative Christian groups in Karl Rove's base strategy face their own generation gap, as young people in their core religious constituencies take greater interest in working against global warming, genocide in Darfur, hunger and homelessness in America.

As Bushism has incarcerated Republicanism into ever decreasing concentric circles of support, as growing majorities of Americans feel excluded and offended, the Democratic surge has begun to gather steam and is spreading.

New England, Northeast states, the heart of the Midwest. Jon Tester triumphs in Montana and while Dorothy came from Kansas, so does Governor Sebelius who is leading a resurgent Democratic Party. The Southwest has now joined the wave with star power governors, growing demographic clout of hispanics, and a white-collar populism of social justice, fiscal integrity and support for military families.

The surprise story of 2007 will be the sudden realization that Democrats are within reach of a stunning, breathtaking new majority in the Senate that could reach 60 Democratic Senators.

In 2008 there are 21 Senate Republicans running for reelection and only 12 Democrats. This historical anomaly almost guarantees some Democratic gains, but look at the races today, state by state.

Some of the highest quality Republicans in the Senate are at retirement age; others face very low popularity ratings, and in state after state there are prominent, powerful Democrats waiting in the wings, considering a Senate run.

Watch the spectacle of Senate Republicans running for cover, desperately trying to escape the Bush undertow, knowing they can run but they can't hide, to use a boxing metaphor appropriate for Harry Reid, the former boxer who is handling the Senate brilliantly.

Watch the Republicans in the House, with anger management problems from their loss of power. Dozens of them are voting for the Democratic programs skillfully advanced by Speaker Pelosi, while others, incarcerated by their ideology, are going on record against policies supported by the folks back home.

Watch what happens when the Democratic Congress investigates the $10 billlion of Iraq reconstruction money that was stolen, ripped off, robbed or wasted through crony deals given to Republican pals, while our troops risked their lives.

All of this, and more, create a historic moment similar to the eras that gave America a period where Democrats were the majority party with waves of renewal and reform from FDR and JFK. The only question for Democrats today: are we visionary enough to see it, and bold enough to make it happen?

Everyone knows there were disputes between the DNC and some Congressional Democrats for much of 2006. Here is the magic moment for Democrats today: if we do our jobs in 2007 we can have it all in 2008. We can contest for every voter, in every state, in every district, on every issue, with every weapon but the price is this: we must be visionary and aggressive in 2007 and seize the moment.

Welcome to the NFL. From now on, we are playing offense.

Democrats should initiate the greatest effort for candidate recruitment in American political history beginning in 2007. We should find and support Democratic veterans for 2008; begin a historic campaign for voter registration, voter mobilization and honest elections; and bring together our grassroots, our state party chairs, our Congressional leaders in a bold alliance.

I propose that Democrats chairs and leaders in Washington initiate a new age of political empowerment beginning with a Democracy Bond similar to the current DNC program, with the special purpose of going throughout the party to raise money for states to begin historic voter registration programs.

As we honor Martin Luther King, why not plan a new Freedom Summer? Why not raise major money from the grassroots, mobilize our great entertainers, work with the Congressional Black and Hispanic Caucuses, carry the message through the internet and progressive radio, and register a million new Democrats?

And yes, it is high time Democrats put a little advertising money into Internet sites that have huge followings and I predict would raise a tidal wave of money for a cause they believe in deeply, which would help Democrats at every level.

Why not use 2007 to mobilize Democratic war heroes such as Wes Clark, John Glenn, Bob Kerrey and Congressional heroes such as Jim Webb, Joe Sestak and all Fighting Democrats to go into the states, promote our veterans programs, and play an aggressive role recruiting 2008 candidates with promises to raise money and barnstorm in support if they run?

Why not establish as a core principle of our party what Jack Kennedy said that makes us great: ask what we can do for our country?

Why not mobilize the entire party to reach into the hearts of tens of millions in military families, and a hundred million in our houses of worship, with a call to arms to end homelessness among our vets, the
homeless heroes, and then to escalate what we really should escalate, our idealism and passion to end hunger and homeless in every corner of our country?

Why not use the first day of our 2008 National Convention not to ask voters what they can do for us, but to join our superstar entertainers with our most heroic leaders in a U.S.O. style concert, where one after another, each will rise to say what great cause they support, building a huge audience with their talent, sending a huge message to America with their hearts, and ours?

Within our reach, is the possibility to rebuild the unity and spirit of America, to enter a new political age of idealism and unity, togetherness and greatness, leadership and inspiration. God's work will truly be our own. We are in this together. The age of Bushism has ended and the hour for renewal and reform has come.

We should reach for greatness with the high aspiration of a new political realignment, a lasting Democratic majority, a new Democratic President with a Democratic Congress that is of the people, by the people, and for the people. If we do, future historians will write about the era of FDR, the era of JFK, and the era of what we begin in 2007. Lets roll.

Note: This essay was orginally published by
Fighting Dems News Service which can be
visited at: www.fighting-dems.com

 

Brent Budowsky is a regular columnist on thehill.com. He served as Legislative Assistant to U.S. Senator Lloyd Bentsen, responsible for commerce and intelligence matters, including one (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
59 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great stuff, Brent! by Steven Leser on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 3:41:04 PM
Too funny! by Mark E. Smith on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 4:54:13 PM
We each make our own reality by Irvthom on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:06:25 AM
Republicans and Democrats..... by larry booth on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 5:13:04 PM
Why would Chavez take a demotion? by ardee D. on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 5:26:53 PM
I knew mymarkx would get there first....and he did. by ardee D. on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 5:23:23 PM
There Is A Difference With A Democratic Congress by Brent Budowsky on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 6:00:04 PM
we all have opinions by ardee D. on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 5:13:20 PM
Buried the lead in paragraph 25 by Charlie L on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 6:09:17 PM
Bravo by ardee D. on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 5:10:14 PM
Cultivating illusions in Democrats is harmful to the public by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 6:33:09 PM
The Great Democratic Landslide Of 2008 by Robert Chapman on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 7:36:34 PM
Tell it to Sweeney. by Mark E. Smith on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 9:15:20 PM
Question Brent by Fred F on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 8:56:03 PM
Ah yes, he does marketing and he disagrees with YOU, so... by Steven Leser on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 2:09:01 AM
P.S., I am the one who flagged you... by Steven Leser on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 2:13:08 AM
I never got to read the hidden comment by ardee D. on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 5:19:03 PM
Click on my name in any of my comments, Ardee, by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:07:17 PM
Thnak you sir, for the offer by ardee D. on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:26:53 AM
And I am going to keep flagging you... by Steven Leser on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:06:25 PM
P.S. by Steven Leser on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:18:45 PM
Thanks for proving my case by ardee D. on Sunday, Jan 21, 2007 at 9:10:02 AM
You keep thinking so if that makes you feel better by Steven Leser on Sunday, Jan 21, 2007 at 3:31:02 PM
thats not all most here know by ardee D. on Sunday, Jan 21, 2007 at 3:51:06 PM
Ok by Fred F on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:46:21 PM
Understand the Bully by Charlie L on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:59:33 PM
oped article by ruth on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:56:36 PM
And don't forget... by Charlie L on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:06:45 AM
Response To Two Comments by Brent Budowsky on Thursday, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:17:44 PM
Thank you for responding, Brent. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 4:26:51 AM
Since when has optimism been such a problem? by Irvthom on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:47:26 AM
Good stuff Irv and good responses Brent by Steven Leser on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 1:56:09 AM
But Hitler never responded to Gandhi. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 3:48:39 AM
Gandhi was always ready to make all sorts of accomodations by Steven Leser on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 8:51:06 AM
Not everyone sees this as a BSD contest. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 8:42:49 PM
Sorry, I thought this was politics in a Democracy... by Steven Leser on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:08:28 PM
Oh, and Stephen...... by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 4:43:24 AM
Sorry, I misspelled your name, Steven. I apologize. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 5:31:02 AM
Oh, and Mark... by Steven Leser on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 9:10:52 AM
Inappropriate comparison, Steven. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:47:10 AM
I'm willing to let my previous comments stand at this point by Steven Leser on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 2:06:38 PM
I think by Katrin R. on Sunday, Jan 21, 2007 at 6:49:08 AM
I hope your comment is not removed, though I think you err by ardee D. on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 5:36:37 PM
Steven's comments can't be removed. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 8:32:52 PM
If you look up ad-hominem, you will understand why... by Steven Leser on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:16:11 PM
About that 'troll' thing by Irvthom on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 8:38:39 PM
Thank you for your response by ardee D. on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:43:02 AM
Some straight talk by Irvthom on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 7:37:48 PM
Yes it is impossible by ardee D. on Monday, Jan 22, 2007 at 6:57:03 PM
Too little, and too late. by rabblerowzer on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 5:41:26 AM
On Optimism by Brent Budowsky on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 6:11:25 AM
Brent, your comment was hard to read. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:32:25 PM
On Optimism by Brent Budowsky on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 6:12:42 AM
Thank you, Brent. by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:19:56 PM
31 strange comments by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:46:28 AM
A few words about conspiracy... by Irvthom on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 8:50:22 PM
A fundamental flaw in logic by ardee D. on Thursday, Jan 25, 2007 at 7:06:20 AM
Just for kicks, I took Steven's argument by Mark E. Smith on Friday, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:59:16 PM
Why would you think that would matter to me? by Steven Leser on Saturday, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:42:33 PM