OpEdNews Op Eds

A Liberal Foreign Policy: Ten Maxims

Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The catastrophic occupation of Iraq is evidence of far more than the incompetence of the Bush Administration; it is proof that the conservative worldview is fatally flawed. As the 43rd Presidency staggers to an ignominious finale, liberals must prepare not only to govern America, but also to proclaim a new vision. Liberal foreign policy should be based upon ten elemental concepts:

1. America needs to lead by example, rather than by force. While it seems obvious to most Americans that the United States should practice what it preaches, this essential moral maxim was abandoned by a Bush Administration whose operating philosophy is: "Do what I say, not what I do." Bush conservatism brought a host of problems to US democratic process: stolen elections, denial of civil rights, and unlawful expansion of presidential authority, to mention only a few. Liberal leaders must practice democracy and set foreign policy from that moral ground.

2. Propagating democracy requires a multinational effort, rather than unilateral action. Americans believe that democracy should be spread throughout the world; the question is by what means. Conservatives maintain the US has unique moral status in the world and, therefore, the privilege to govern the world community: "We're the biggest and, therefore, the best." This conceit, the belief in American exceptionalism, serves as an excuse for US imperialism. Liberals believe that a multi-polar effort is required to spread democracy.

3. Democracy cannot be imposed; it has to be nurtured. Bush conservatism argues that American military power can catalyze Western-style democracy in non-democratic states: "Might makes right." Liberals believe that while multinational police forces can protect human rights they can't guarantee democracy.

4. There's more to foreign policy than shaking a big stick. Conservative foreign policy presumes that a strong military is America's best ambassador: "Adopt democracy or we'll shoot you." This big-stick approach hasn't worked in Afghanistan or Iraq and shows no sign of working in the rest of the world. Liberal foreign policy recognizes that diplomacy is an essential tool both in promoting democracy and building coalitions in the national interest.

5. Democracy is not synonymous with capitalism. The Bush Administration advocates a cardboard version of democracy that emphasizes property rights and open markets, and glosses over the necessity for human rights and civil society. Their approach stems from an elemental conservative maxim: "In a democracy, free markets inevitably solve national problems." Predictably the application of this doctrine in non-Western societies produced authoritarian, plutocratic states featuring rampant inequality and environmental degradation.

6. Some emerging democracies cannot support western-style capitalism. Because of their confidence in the power of the open market, Bush conservatives invariably get the cart before the horse: "Ensure capitalism and democracy will surely follow." In many non-western states, democracy must be nurtured-by engendering civil society-before it is strong enough to support free-market capitalism. In the mean time, capitalism must be limited or national resources will be squandered and plutocrats will prevail.

7. The global marketplace is not a substitute for global civil society. Coincident with their belief in spreading democracy through militarism, Bush conservatives have deregulated the international economy. They've promoted globalization in the naïve belief that this would inevitably remedy international economic, environmental, political, and social problems: "The market will provide." The results have been devastating: economic inequality and environmental degradation-to name only two problems--have spiraled out of control. Liberals believe in the importance of international governance.

8. The United Nations and other international organizations need to be revamped rather than abandoned. Conservatives argue that the UN doesn't work and, therefore, should be replaced by a coalition of democracies headed by the United States. They believe that because America is the preeminent world power, it should determine international policy on all important matters: "We're number one; therefore, we call the shots." Liberals argue that America should redefine its role to that of building coalitions, exercising its power judiciously in a multi polar world.

9. America needs to close its overseas military bases and bring American troops home. The United States maintains more than 700 overseas military facilities and has an active military presence in more than forty countries. Bush conservatives argue that this guarantees national security: "We're safer because of our military hegemony." Liberals believe that conservatives continue to fight the cold war; that the socio-political realities of the twenty-first century, and the campaign against terrorism, dictate that the US should bring its troops home, beef up homeland security, and strengthen international alliances.

10. America needs to replace military spending with foreign aid. Conservatives ignore the economic and social roots of terrorism, the reality that rampant globalization fostered the conditions that produced Al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations. In place of a systemic analysis, Bush conservatives proffer platitudes: "They hate us because of our freedoms." Liberals recognize that eliminating the conditions that foster terrorism requires the rich nations of the world to help the poor, to guarantee the elemental human rights that underpin democracy.

The key to transforming US foreign policy is for American liberals to practice democracy at home.

 

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. In a previous life he was one of the executive founders of Cisco Systems.
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Telltale Signs of Republican Disease

Big Liars and The Voters Who Love Them

Obama vs. Romney: The Bottom Line

The GOP Chooses Fascism

Obama vs. Romney: The Popularity Contest

2011 Budget Battle: Obama Wins While Democrats Lose

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

assumptions you're making about what "liberalism" ... by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Mar 1, 2007 at 10:57:19 AM
I would sure like to see a Democratic presidential... by Christie on Thursday, Mar 1, 2007 at 6:35:09 PM
Those are very good points. The thought that the U... by Eliot Gould on Thursday, Mar 1, 2007 at 7:30:48 PM
"evidence of far more than the incompetence of the... by amazin on Friday, Mar 2, 2007 at 6:51:03 AM