Tags for This Article:

Iraq (5275)  Iran (2496)  2008 Elections (2414)  Republican (2395)  Democratic (1913)  Democrats Progressive (174)  Centrist-Moderate (9) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 19, 2007 at 09:26:38

Looking to the 2008 Election: Confusion, Anger, Hope

by Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

By Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers

Let's construct a pair of binoculars out of two quotes. What we see may help us understand more clearly our current reality and where it could take us in November 2008.



Seen through the right ocular is this doozy by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger; ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/americas/2521835.stm ) it's from another era (the early-1970s, to be exact), discussing the socialist government of Salvador Allende in Chile prior to the military coup that toppled his government:

"The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves...I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist due to the irresponsibility of its people."

Seen through the the left ocular is a recent remark by liberal Democratic Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey from California, ( http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/woolsey-calls-for-attacks-on-colleagues-2007-09-12.htm ) speaking to a gathering of anti-war activists:

"You folks should go after the Democrats. . . . I'd hate to lose the majority, but I'm telling you, if we don't stand up to our responsibility, maybe that's the lesson to be learned."

So let's join the two together, adjust the binocular focus and see what's on the political horizon.

U.S. TRUSTS DEMOCRACY UNTIL...

Kissinger's recommendation for the U.S. to decide, and help arrange for, the "correct" rulers for other countries should not be surprising. (In case you've forgotten, Chile's President Allende was overthrown by rightist forces, with covert U.S. help.) That's what authoritarian ideologues do. Why? Because they are convinced they hold the patents on Truth and Righteousness and thus are permitted, nea required, to play God with other peoples' lives.

Bush carries it even further, claiming that God told him to invade Iraq. ( www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1007-03.htm )

And now, the supposedly "sovereign" government of Iraq is under firm orders from Bush to meet the "benchmarks" for stability, reconciliation, oil-revenue sharing, etc., or else. The "or else" is clear. If al-Maliki can't or won't do it, he will be replaced by a more malleable, U.S.-friendly leader.

"Yes, we made a thorough mess of the situation from the first moment we invaded and set up our occupation. Yes, your civilians are dying by the hundreds each week, sometimes each day, because we removed your dictator but without moving fast enough to establish law and order and police presence and governmental institutions. Yes, we disbanded your army and thus sent hundreds of thousands of young, armed men into the streets without jobs or compensation. Yes, several million of your best and brightest citizens have emigrated from the charnel house that is Iraq.

"And because we are responsible for a good share of all this misery and slaughter, we're going to stay another ten years until YOU get it right.

"Oh, by the way, we're considering arranging for the division of your country into three distinct parts -- Shia, Sunni, Kurds -- but you'll love it. No need to fret: It's for your own good."


BEWARE OF "TRUTH" ZEALOTS

What's happening in Iraq, using the Kissinger quote as an example, is not unique to the CheneyBush Administration, nor to the United States of America. Self-righteous zealots, infused with "The Truth," have been galloping over the historical landscape for millenia, causing death and destruction whenever and wherever they decide to conquer and rule other peoples "for their own good." (At least that's the public rationale; privately, it's most often greed for territory and natural resources, attempts to control unstable geopolitical situations, vendettas for perceived injustices, etc. etc.)

 1  |  2  |  3

 

www.crisispapers.org

Bernard Weiner, Ph.D. in government & international relations, has taught at universities in California and Washington, worked for two decades as a writer-editor at the San Francisco Chronicle, and currently serves as co-editor of The Crisis Papers (www.crisispapers.org).

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Former Lawyer, current Business Consultant,history buff, Christian, father of 2 sons and a supporter of democratic government.
ArchieFormer Lawyer, current Business Consultant,history buff, Christian, father of 2 sons and a supporter of democratic government.

2008

Unfortunately you need to reform your election process or none of what you state will occur. As long as Republicans can steal elections you will never know if your vote counted or not.

by Archie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1273 comments) on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 at 1:46:57 PM
 


I am a 56 year old male cabinet maker. I am also a Ron Paul supporter.
chessmasterI am a 56 year old male cabinet maker. I am also a Ron Paul supporter.

None of the above

The none of the above mentioned in this article was Ron Paul supporters who couldn't vote for Ron Paul because they took him off because he kept winning and they didn't like it. Another likely story for the election is Ron Paul wins the Republican nomination because he is the only one who is against the war. All of Ron Pauls' supporters will be at the polls on election day to give him the win. No other candidate has followers like Ron Paul. If it comes down to Clinton and Ron Paul he will win.

by chessmaster (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 27 comments) on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 at 2:37:33 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

The Coming of the Second Great Depression? Posted by Nathan White

Go To Top 50 Most Popular