Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (17 comments)

30 days to absolute tyranny

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Alex Wallenwein  Posted by Elaine (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

30 DAYS TO ABSOLUTE TYRANNY
---------------------------------------------------------

30 DAYS TO ABSOLUTE TYRANNY
(Now 23 Days!)
Latest Bush Executive Order Outlaws Iraq War Dissent on Penalty of Full Asset Seizure
In an as yet un-numbered Executive Order (at least the number isn't published), president bush has decreed that your property - all of it - can be taken away at the sole discretion of the Secretary of the Treasury at the mere suspicion that you may commit a crime in the future. You can view and read this latest executive atrocity at the White House website.

An executive order only becomes law if Congress doesn’t overturn it within thirty days after it is published in the Federal Register.

If you own a business, this concerns you. Whether you own it as a sole proprietorship, as a sole shareholder, or even as a partial shareholder of a corporation, you stand to lose all of it if the Secretary thinks you may commit an "act of violence" that may disrupt the war (or peace) effort in Iraq. Naturally, "act of violence" is not defined anywhere in this order.

Once this becomes law, he has all the tools Hitler and Stalin had to keep their respective populations in utter subjection to their will.

The executive order states in Section 1(a) that “all property and interests in property” of “any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of - blah, blah, blah (followed by a laundry list of “purposes or effects”).


This means that the triggering factor underlying any such blocking order is a mere “determination” by the Secretary of the Treasury that you pose a “significant risk” of committing an act of violence in the future that has any of the listed purposes or effects. All the Secretary then has to do is to “consult” with the secretaries of state and defense. There is not even a requirement that these two agree with the Treasury Secretary’s “determination”(!)

In other words, if the Secretary of the Treasury says that you “pose a significant risk” of committing an act of violence with the purpose or effect of “threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people”, then the 'bushprez' can block you from accessing your bank account, retirement account, credit cards, or “any property or interest in property” that you may own.

That technically includes your house, whether owned or rented, your car or other means of transportation, whether owned or rented, your business, all the way down to your cell phone, toothpaste and underwear, as well as the twenty bucks you loaned your buddy that he hasn’t paid you back yet.

What is there to keep the Secretary of the Treasury from “determining” that you, because you oppose the war in Iraq, are probably one of those extremist hooligans who protested the WTO in Seattle a few years back, or that you are likely to act like one of them even though you haven’t even participated in those riots? War protesters do these things, don’t they? They are all the same, aren’t they?

If the Secretary “determines” that you probably are one of them and that you “pose a significant risk of committing” an act of violence intended to frustrate the war (or even the peace effort) in Iraq, all of your stuff can be taken away from you - or you can be “blocked” from accessing it, which pretty much amounts to the same thing.

You have no legal recourse under this order. No remedy at law. The order does not provide for compensation to you for the taking of your property. There is no due process requirement that will guarantee you a fair hearing in a court of law.

Unconstitutional? You bet!

But you can’t complain about it.

Why is that?

The president has declared a state of emergency back in 2003 (as he recites in this executive order at the end of the paragraph that starts with “I, GEORGE W. BUSH”). That state of emergency has not been rescinded, to this date.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Oppose executive order outlawing war dissent

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"bushwhack" by rabblerowzer on Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:00:54 AM
LEGAL OPINION by ladybroadoak on Friday, Jul 27, 2007 at 6:05:08 AM
watching it burn... by k kelly on Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:12:43 AM
The Congress will do nothing by Charlie L on Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:07:19 PM
You are right but it is complex by Bernard on Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 at 3:27:39 PM
LOL, that's funny. by RCG on Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 at 9:46:25 PM
Desperation by Co6aka on Thursday, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:50:37 PM
Congress needs to wake up!!! by ksl on Friday, Jul 27, 2007 at 1:22:36 AM
a by Tim Budds on Friday, Jul 27, 2007 at 5:58:52 AM
My dear Sir, by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jul 27, 2007 at 9:24:43 AM
"30 days to absolute tyranny" by Elaine by syed mahdi on Friday, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:54:21 PM
Why is it almost always the new 2 comment posters by RCG on Friday, Jul 27, 2007 at 7:01:08 PM
Executiuve Order for dictator Tyranny for Bush by Swami Bogananda on Saturday, Jul 28, 2007 at 2:40:10 PM
more info 'bout it by James at IRB on Sunday, Jul 29, 2007 at 12:08:12 PM
No, this is different by Ellen Theisen on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 9:06:00 AM
What does "An act or acts of violence" mean? by Marcus B on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 8:51:13 PM
Clarification by Marcus B on Monday, Jul 30, 2007 at 9:04:23 PM