Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
January 6, 2006 at 05:51:11

View Ratings | Rate It

TODAY IN HISTORY: Gifted Scientist and Her Theories Emerge from Relative Obscurity

by Butler, Meryl Ann     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

History shows that Mileva was married on January 6, 1903. A fateful day.

She was a woman the world should know about. The few who know her story, marvel at it.
The 103nd anniversary of her marriage is an appropriate day on which to remember her.

Mileva Maric was born in Hungary on December 19, 1875, with a displaced hip that would become a lifelong limp. But she was a gifted child, displaying brilliance in the arts and sciences, and her wealthy parents supported her intellectual growth with an outstanding education. She was admitted to an all-male high school, one of the first girls in her country to be accorded that privilege. Due to her handicap and plain looks, she did not generate interest from the boys, but that allowed her to focus on her studies, and she was awarded top grades in physics as well as mathematics.

Passionate about physics, she planned a career in a field that few women had ever even considered, enrolling in a prestigious polytechnic school, as the only woman enrolled at the time, and the 5th woman in the school's history.


There she shone like a bright star, and a student several years her junior idolized her. Mileva seemed to him to be a kind of goddess of physics, and he worshipped the ground she stood on. She saw in him an extraordinary potential, and nurtured it.

The two became inseparable, studying the works of renowned physicists and philosophers as their relationship deepened. Mileva was soaring with the unbridled adulation of her young admirer. Albert was intoxicated with his muse. They were constant companions, colleagues, and confidantes. In affectionate letters during their times apart, they endearingly addressed each other as "Johnny" and "Dollie", and wrote of science, philosophy and love.

When Dollie was accepted at the University of Zurich as a Ph.D candidate, Johnny followed her…or tried to. His grades were insufficient to get him into the doctoral program, but he was accepted to study there. Then Dollie received a coveted position as an assistant to a well-known and respected professor. Johnny was not much for attending lectures, but he wanted desperately to work in the lab with this scientist. Dollie pleaded, but was unable to convince the professor to accept the rather ordinary student as an assistant.

Then an unexpected pregnancy changed the course of the young couple's lives. Johnny was unable to support them. Pregnant, unmarried and stressed, Dollie uncharacteristically failed her final exams. She left her studies and they struggled to find employment. Dollie's parents thought her boyfriend was a ne'er-do-well, unable to support himself, let alone a wife and child. Johnny's parents were appalled that Dollie was handicapped, of a different faith, and most importantly, far too intellectual for a woman. Johnny conveniently disappeared and Dollie went home to her parents.

He never came to see his baby. Distraught, disgraced and depressed, the 27-year old unwed mother reluctantly gave her daughter up for adoption.

With the child out of the picture, Johnny ventured back, and they reconciled. A friend helped him procure a simple job as a clerk, and they married, despite their families' protests. Their newlywed times were idyllic. In their evenings together, they nestled by the fire, and fueled with the creativity of reignited love they explored the intellectual ecstasies of their innovative ideas, the very activities that had brought them together in the beginning.

In 1905, a paper with the theories, and with one name - Dollie's - on it, was completed. Somehow, by the time the paper was published, her name was replaced by her husband's. Maybe she agreed to it, surmising rightly for that day and age, that something so radical, if authored by a woman, would have been instantly dismissed.

As time passed, Dollie became a busy mother of two boys, making up as best as she could for the neglect they received from their father. The practicalities of daily life chipped away the pedestal that her husband had placed her on. And it was no secret that Johnny was straying from his family, spending time with other women, eventually falling madly in love with his cousin, and later with her eldest daughter.

One evening when Johnny arrived at a party alone, their friends, concerned, asked about Dollie. Not satisfied with Johnny's evasive answer, they checked on her. They found Dollie at home crying, her face bruised and swollen, but refusing to explain what had happened. Shortly after, Johnny relocated his family to another country so that he could be closer to his lover-cousin. A listing of his many abuses of Dollie during this time, written in his own hand, remains in archives today.

As a result of Johnny's insistence and relentless cruelty, Dollie finally agreed to a divorce. But only on the condition that any future prize monies that her ex-husband might make based on her theories, would be paid to her.

And that is why, when Albert Einstein won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1921, he quietly forwarded the check to his ex-wife, Mileva Maric, who used the money in her continuing, lifelong struggle to support herself and their children.

They don't call it HIStory for nothing.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.merylannbutler.com

Meryl Ann Butler is an artist, author and educator who counts First Lady Dolley Payne Todd Madison as well as two signers of the Articles of Confederation among her ancestors. Mary Ball, mother of George Washington is in the ancestral lineage of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Science Womens Issues"
Extrapolation Spring 1982, Vol. 23, #1 - Special Issue: Women in Science Fiction
by Thomas D. (ed) Clareson

$9.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: Kent State University Press

Women and science: Issues and resources
by Susan E Searing


Number of pages: 26
Publisher: University of Wisconsin System, Women's Studies Librarian

Gender Issues: Women's Participation in the Sciences Has Increased, but Agencies Need to Do More to Ensure Compliance with Title IX.: An article from: General Accounting Office Reports

$5.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Stonehenge International

Woman of Power Science and Technology: Issue Eleven Fall 1988
by Char (editor) McKee

$17.95

Number of pages:
Publisher: Woman of Power, Inc.

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments


behind every man...

What a moving piece! I am going to tell all my women friends to read this and find out what we all should know ( and may have guessed from the pics of him?)

by C. Angelica Perry (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Friday, Jan 6, 2006 at 6:53:53 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Historical claims must be based on solid evidence

Meryl Ann Butler writes: "Even today, Mileva often gets no mention in biographical accounts of her 'Johnny'." Has Ms Butler taken the trouble to examine a single Einstein biography to check if this statement is true? I possess numerous biographies of Einstein, and all of them without exception have information about Mileva Maric. This includes half a dozen published between 1948 and 1982. Ms Butler also writes: "In 1905, a paper with the theories, and with one name – Dollie's - on it, was completed. Somehow, by the time the paper was published, her name was replaced by her husband's." Ms Butler does not seem to know too much about Einstein's publications. She writes of "a paper" with "the theories". What paper? What theories? Einstein published five papers in 1905. Leaving this aside, Ms Butler has embroidered the usual claim, which is that both Einstein's and Maric's names were on the three most celebrated of the 1905 papers. But there is not a scrap of evidence that this was the case; the claim depends on a tendentious misreading of the supposed evidence. See, e.g., Alberto A. Martinez, "Handling evidence in history: the case of Einstein's wife": http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=183 See also: http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=182 For a detailed refutation of the claims that Mileva Maric made substantive contributions to Einstein's 1905 papers, see: http://www.esterson.org/milevamaric.htm

by Allen Esterson (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Sunday, Mar 26, 2006 at 3:32:18 AM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Tampa, FL - UnitedHealth to Enter Funeral Parlor Industry by James Dunham

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

The Real Cause of the Current Financial Crisis by Joe Reeser

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Did Obama Appoint People With Track Record of Making Right Decisions? by Ralph Nader

The true face of politics as 467,000 jobs were shed by Mary MacElveen

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum