Texas UFOs. The Cascade Mountain range of Washington State. Mexico city. Peru. Virtually every major UFO hotspot that has entered the internet mainstream and the television media all have one thing in common: video, photo and eyewitness testimony of flying objects doing amazing things in the sky.
There exists in the mind the drive to find answers to life's mysteries. It is a completely natural function of the brain to work at finding answers to an unknown. Sometimes the mind will accept an illogical conclusion based on lack of information rather than accept a vacuum. In some instances, information can be used to the advantage of those who have it over those who do not.
UFO sightings are no different.
The tendency to rush to judgment on powerful emotional feelings tied to actually seeing these objects is a phenomena in itself, as the most likely explanation given is "it was extraterrestrial!". And why not come to that conclusion! These UFOs fly around our airplanes, helicopters, even our spacecraft and other known flying objects. ET pilots are a logical conclusion under the circumstances, in spite of the best critics attempts to say otherwise. But only because of a lack of knowledge of the greater picture.
Ancient texts considered "religious" are filled with tales of interaction with "those from Heaven sent". These can reasonably be viewed as records of a highly advanced race of beings and their interaction and possible creation or manipulation of the human species, a race obviously less technologically advanced at that time. See the Temple of Ea in Sumeria (now Iraq) as an example (Where else do you see a creator god making the race of man in a beaker, associated with the double helix, in ancient stone reliefs?).
In modern times, we can see clear evidence that this is a possible explanation in what's become known as "cargo cult" mentality. The following is extracted from Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult ):
The most widely known period of cargo cult activity, however, was in the years during and after World War II. First the Japanese arrived with a great deal of unknown equipment and later member countries of the Allies also used the islands in the same way. The vast amounts of war matériel that were airdropped onto these islands during the Pacific campaign against the Empire of Japan necessarily meant drastic changes to the lifestyle of the islanders, many of whom had never seen Westerners or Japanese before. Manufactured clothing, medicine, canned food, tents, weapons, and other useful goods arrived in vast quantities to equip soldiers. Some of it was shared with the islanders who were their guides and hosts. With the end of the war the airbases were abandoned, and "cargo" was no longer being dropped.
In attempts to get cargo to fall by parachute or land in planes or ships again, islanders imitated the same practices they had seen the soldiers, sailors, and airmen use. They carved headphones from wood and wore them while sitting in fabricated control towers. They waved the landing signals while standing on the runways. They lit signal fires and torches to light up runways and lighthouses. The cult members thought that the foreigners had some special connection to the deities and ancestors of the natives, who were the only beings powerful enough to produce such riches.
In a form of sympathetic magic, many built life-size replicas of airplanes out of straw and created new military-style landing strips, hoping to attract more airplanes. Ultimately, although these practices did not bring about the return of the airplanes that brought such marvelous cargo during the war, they did have the effect of eradicating the most of the religious practices that had existed prior to the war.
Over the last seventy-five years most cargo cults have disappeared. Yet, the John Frum cult is still active on the island of Tanna, Vanuatu.
If we can for a brief moment set aside all theories of who the pilots of today's UFO craft are, we can then focus on the actual flying objects themselves. Some have done this. Many in the study of UFOs and their technology choose to focus on power and propulsion systems rather than the speculation about the UFO phenomenon.
Yet, even with that brief moment of suspending all preconceived ideas about modern UFOs, there still exists the presumption that only humans with advanced degrees in the highest levels of physics and engineering working in top secret, or extraterrestrials are can build these craft. That groundless presumption is proving to be a major obstacle to overcome and shows humanity as a whole is gripped in "cargo cult" mentality over this technology.
The simpleprinciples upon which UFOs fly is a known concept, but it is not often spoken of in physics.
The hundred years of UFO patents unearthed and published show a repetition of the same craft being built upon the same principle patented [erroneously] again and again. The principles are not difficult to understand.
In our opinion, until people become aware that UFO craft and the technology used to power up and fly them have been built, patented and are within the grasp of the public, humanity will not progress beyond the cargo cult stage. Global wars over precious resources and the resulting pollution and destruction to the environment will continue and increase. Disease and death tolls in humanity will increase. Animal, plant and insect species will continue to go extinct.
This technology has somehow managed to slip under the radar of virtually every UFO researcher. We do not have to wait for official government disclosure. They did it through granting the patents applied for and have done so for the last 100 years as the technology progressed!
Team Fortune is taking the lead in full UFO disclosure to the general public by introducing public domain technology found at the patent office. We have produced over 3400 pages of proof that man has had the ability to build UFO craft, in replicable form, over the last 100 years. This disclosure effort includes:
Publishing 260 patents that explain how the various UFOs that have been seen by witnesses operate and can be reproduced
Showing how these craft can:
be glowing balls of light
go invisible to radar
be made saucer, sphere, cigar, or triangle shaped
Exceed speeds at least 60 times greater than rocket propulsion
Nullify gravity and inertia to pull off incredible high speed maneuvers and right angle turns
Keep pilots safe from these speeds, maneuvers and the harshness of outerspace that would kill ordinary pilots in conventional aircraft
The different forms of technology that can be implemented into the various craft to cause these phenomenal propulsion abilities:
Fusion, fission, and anti-matter propulsion technologies
Even traditional airfoil/air-flow technologies, for people who refuse to grasp the other available technologies
A drafted and released prospectus on how this technology can be used to improve the global economy and raise the standards of the quality of life for all people on the planet
Showing this technology in an encyclopedic format, along with a Primer for people to grasp how it works
Free online videos to educate the public as to how this technology works, and presented it in easy to grasp layman vocabulary
Publishing a now public domain device patent for "free energy" production
The ten dollar book, "The Basics," by Luke Fortune, includes a patent entitled "Method and means for producing perpetual motion with high power." This could be adjusted to power a home, run your car, etc. And this is just one that make up the more than three thousand pages of patented technology.
In the quest to produce a free energy device (over unity or "OU"), the most viable and easily understood of such devices are the "collapsing field" technologies.
A simplified explanation is as follows:
In any kind of transformer, electricity is transferred between the two coils by the magnetic field. When a coil is initially powered up or switched off, that coil creates a magnetic field which causes an initial rush of electricity, usually called a 'voltage spike.' In conventional electronics, this voltage spike is suppressed to protect the other components from damage. In collapsing field technology (CFT), that voltage spike is harnessed, not suppressed. Many researchers achieved documented and replicable results of 5% to 10% over unity (1.05 to 1.1 OU, or also described as 105% to 110% return of electricity in the transfer).
Patented technology exists that exploits this principle, as well as technology that allows for a recovery of 99.9% of "used" electricity in any circuit. But mankind will not progress to a state of global advancement by staying in their homes and generating or recycling electricity. Only by incorporation of these exotic propulsion systems into current shipping and travel industries will global progress occur.
We truly believe that the public wants to know about the crafts, so producing educational material has been a priority. The obstacle is exposure.
As far as people having the wherewithal to build a "UFO" vehicle, if you can design and build a tesla coil, you could design and build such a craft. That there are 100 years of patents on electrogravitic craft is mere testimony to the fact that people don't understand the principle -- it is the same patent recurring over and over espousing the same principle over and over.
At Team Fortune, we are still attempting to frame the explanation of this principle in a manner that reaches people and is easily understood. Our goal is to be able to fund a research facility that addresses these issues. We believe that they are intertwined in the prospect of improving the quality of life for all people.
Another real obstacle facing the integration of these technologies into the current paradigm is that those who are financially invested in the current system have no desire to let these lofty ideals deprive them of their profit margins. How do we make such changes? Can we?
For instance, the claim that petroleum resources are depleting may exist simply for the purpose of driving oil prices up. In 2003, MicroJoule won the Shell Ecomarathon getting 10,291 miles on one gallon gas. In 1984 Kure Tekko of Japan got in the Guinness book of world records getting over 5,000 miles on one gallon of gas, and two years later Americans beat that record by over 1,000 miles more.
Why hasn't that technology been implemented?
MUFON and other UFO groups report record numbers of UFO sightings, and these reports are coming from all over the world. The UFO How-to series documents patents from the US, Canada, Britain, and France, but that limit is only because of size and space limitations in the books. These UFO patents are found in the patent office records of Italy, China, Japan, South Korea, Germany, Russia...
This technology isn't new and it is ERUPTING globally. The question is will American corporations step up to the plate, or will America be left behind because the current structure that is designed to protect the investments in the old and antiquated technologies?
Here are 5 excerpts from 5 patents from 5 of the books [Each book is 99% UFO patents]:
1) The Flying Saucer is a vertical take off and landing vehicle for space flight. The vehicle comprises a metal sphere rotating around a hub to which are affixed four magnetic coils in a circle equidistantly with a fifth coil at the center which is surrounded by a hollow circular glass tube filled with rubidium gas, tube and magnets with axes vertical The inner wall of the tube is made of more dense glass with a phosphor coating, and the top of the tube has a less dense glass outer coating on top of the more dense glass. When an electric motor rotates a vertical column, supported by a bearing at the center of the hub which is attached to the top and bottom of the sphere, the metal sphere rotating around the magnetic coils causes a continuous buildup of electric charge on the sphere and magnetic field, which heats and excites the rubidium gas in the tube so it interacts with the phosphor layer to produce light which is slowed down by the hot rubidium gas; causing a radial Einstein time change over distance, causing increased centrifugal force radially, causing acceleration of sphere rotation, resulting in more mechanical energy than needed to produce the slowed light by the previously mentioned process, with excess energy turning the electric motor as a generator to charge the battery.
2) The present invention relates in general to craft propelled by magnetohydrodynamic effects and methods of propulsion and control thereof, and more particularly to heavier-than-air craft which are propelled by interaction Of magnetic fields upon electrically conductive fluids such as plasma, surrounding the craft.
3) The present invention relates to conversion of energy, and in particular to the use of electrical potentials for producing forces to cause motion of a structure by direct operation of electric fields, thus providing a thrust sufficient for propelling a vehicle.
4) This invention relates generally to propulsion devices, and more particularly to a propulsion device based on plasma acceleration principles and adapted for use in a space environment.
5) The invention relates to the use of the collision of matter and antimatter as a means of propulsion in a spacecraft, to the control system for said engine and to a block diagram of the connections for same, in which all of the functions are divided into modules.
Please visit the website, www.ufohowto.com. Buy the books. Join the email list. We are looking for business owners, investors and other community leaders interested in this technology. Please contact us today to learn more about our economic prospectus plan.
Team Fortune invites all of humanity to join us in our quest to reach to the stars and build a better tomorrow for our children and planet.
The patent office, in my researches, has required patent applicants to provide working prototypes when “extraordinary claims” are made by the applicants. See United States Code Title 35 Section 114.
by
Luke Fortune (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 10:17:09 AM
The applicant is sometimes required to furnish a “model of convenient size” not a full size working ship.
The key words are the “Director may”.
The model is only required to get a conception.
Most likely patent applicants were not even required to submit a model.
I don’t believe the issue relates to paragraph 2 on composition of matter.
Below for your reference is the code section in whole.
CHAPTER 11—APPLICATION FOR PATENT
§ 114. Models, specimens
The Director may require the applicant to furnish a model of convenient size to exhibit advantageously the several parts of his invention.
When the invention relates to a composition of matter, the Director may require the applicant to furnish specimens or ingredients for the purpose of inspection or experiment.
by
Franklin Fields (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 12:33:14 PM
How would you explain the increase in UFO sightings?
Occam's Razor is helpful in this instance...
Thousands of pages of patents that explain what we're seeing for at least the last 100 years
or
Aliens
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
I recall the inventor that is trying to patent a "wormhole generator" has been asked to provide a working model before a patent will be issued. Why would someone claiming to have a flying saucer be treated any different?
by
John Novak (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 4:10:11 PM
Your are correct that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. But not always so it is not a valid point to argue.
If these are earth based humans flying around in faster than light ships hiding that kind of technology from us and doing it for a 100 years or more. Man what an operation that would be… That is even more spectacular than ETs visiting us.
If the patent office issued a patent and required a working model Mr. Fortune being the author and researcher he is alleged to be, should be able to tell us if a working model was provided.
Also, the patent office has only recently made their standards harder. Years ago there was no model requirement.
by
Franklin Fields (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 5:53:35 PM
What do you mean...Why am I using your cite. The answer is because you used it. That is how a argument works. I am saying you are right and further explaining the cite.
And let me say I am not attacking you. I have looked at your web site and have high regard for your efforts. You may be right. But from my position your view does not seem to be correct on all points.
Saying that the UFO disclosure is over because you found patents of flying saucers or their technology is not valid.
It is public knowledge that flying saucers have been constructed and have been flown. I am not arguing that.I am sure that whoever built them would have gotten patents.No problem with that. The ones patented are not capable of doing what we see flying around.
I think it is likely that a secret government is flying around right now in them and maybe some private owners or corporations.
Saying that over 100 years ago earth based humans patented what we are seeing in our skies right now is a stretch and wrong.
Saying that there is no evidence of real ETs is also just plan wrong.You may have looked through a bunch of patents but you have not looked into the UFO and ET phenomena if you believe that.
"The ones patented are not capable of doing what we see flying around."
Sorry friend, you are grossly in error. Glowing balls of light that are invisible to radar, speeds well in excess of what jet fighters are capable of, apparently impossible right angle maneuvering, these are patented and now PUBLIC DOMAIN technologies.
"Saying that over 100 years ago earth based humans patented what we are seeing in our skies right now is a stretch and wrong."
For a start, I didn't say OVER 100 years, I index the last 100 years available from the patent office in my books. And again, unfortunately you are grossly in error--not my opinion, the info from the patent office shows your error.
The fact that you are unfamiliar with the technology doesn't mean it hasn't been created, built, and patented. It is not your fault that you are unfamiliar with this technology. It is your fault that you make these arguments without doing your homework. Ignorance is curable with education. You have a strong passion, and a sharp mind, I'm sure. If you would get up to speed, you could be a strong force in helping move our society into the 21st century, instead of arguing for 20th century mental limitation.
by
Luke Fortune (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 6:46:19 PM
Saying that there is no evidence of real ETs is just plan wrong and I will use your own words because they are good. “It is your fault that you make these arguments without doing your homework. Ignorance is curable with education…… You have a strong passion, and a sharp mind, I'm sure.”
“If you would get up to speed, you could be a strong force in helping move our society” into a full disclosure of Extraterrestrials are their true reality.
Also I don’t understand how you can definitive state how a given technology will perform by looking at the patent.You would really need to see a working prototype to make the kind of statements you have made.
I do believe I understand the technology. What it looks like you are doing is believing that what you see in the air is what is patented and even if you are correct you do not have the proof.
by
Franklin Fields (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 7:09:38 PM
For claiming to be simply a paralegal and only 9 years under your belt research wise, I think I'll wait until one of the more renowned researchers (such as that of Stanton Friedman) put their two-cents in first. I've seen get rich schemes before so I'm gun shy, especially when they claim to have all of the answers to Ufology's most unanswered questions.
Your presentation doesn't scream, HEY! I FOUND IT, I HAVE THE ANSWERS, or something of that nature. Instead, it screams BUY ME! I'm not one to get all fired up.
Lastly, the website name is UFO How-To. How to what? You left the most important word(s) out of the website title. Is that the paralegal in you?
by
Alien Casebook (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 11:24:52 AM
You think he's a credible researcher? He takes other people's research, then calls it his. I have a particular bone to pick with that charlatan over roswell 1947. I discovered the name of the pilot who flew the remains of the crashed ship back to wright field. Friedman took credit for my legwork. He is not a person of honor by any stretch of the imagination.
by
Cinderfella (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 26 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 1:22:14 PM
If this is true, then you won't mind giving us your name so that this can be verified. I have never heard of such a claim and as far as I'm concerned, Stanton Friedman is the Crème de la Crème of Ufologists.
by
Alien Casebook (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 2:22:39 PM
Leonard Stringfield did more real research than anyone. Read about his crash and retrievals. And I don't give out my name. Once you get too close to the truth you only get in trouble. "Some fishermen of the day are the evils thereof." Friedman is a copy cat, deceitful, and takes credit for things that aren't his. My work has already been published. Friedman took it and called it his. His credibility is close to zero in my book.
by
Cinderfella (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 26 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 3:20:05 PM
Friedman is a great researcher with a tremendous amount of conviction and he's not here to defend himself so maybe you ought not repeat what you can't produce.
To quote a great man who stood up and represented the UFO Community while making us all look FANTASTIC and not like the bunch of kooks that most think we are" I have no patience for nasty, noisy negativists".
by
Alien Casebook (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 5:44:32 PM
You really don't know what you are talking about. Read my suggestion. I've done my homework, obviously you haven't. I won't waste any more time, I've got better things to do. I spent an entire decade doing research/interviews, esp crash/retrievals and alien contact. I went underground as a result. Friedman stands tall because he's got nothing to lose for using other people's work. He's just along for the ride, some notoriety, and his 15 minutes of infamy. Don't judge a person until you've walked in their shoes.
by
Cinderfella (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 26 comments)
on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 at 1:56:36 AM
No. I titled it "UFO How-To" because a title like "DIY UFO" would have been implying that you could go to the hardware store and buy parts off the shelf to snap together like it was a kitchen remodel or engine rebuild. Not the case.
"How-To" is an indication of general knowledge. The "UFO How-To" series is an encyclopedic chronicling as recorded by the patent office of the UFO inventors and the 6 main subcategories of UFO propulsion systems that their inventions are categorized under herein .
That's why the books are titled and organized the way they are. So that people can benefit from the time and effort I've put into finding, organizing, and presenting the replicable evidence.
Instead of inciting baseless propoganda of "these books could be fraud," you could get educated on the topic. Or would that take too much of your time?
Ultimately people want to know two questions:
1) Do we possess UFO crafts/technology?
2) If not, are they extra-terrestrial?
In the UFO How-To" series, I answer the first question with a "YES."
In the pages of the UFO How-To" series, I relate the inventors and their inventions that explain how to build craft that do exactly what people are seeing, photographing, and video recording.
You want to know how a craft can be a glowing ball of light that's invisible to radar? The answer is in the books, was patented clearly and openly in the 1960's, and you can replicate it too.
Do you want to understand the technology patented in 1971 that creates a field that nullifies gravity and inertia for craft pilots? The answer is in the books and you can replicate it too.
Do you want to understand the technology patented in the 1920's (and up, over and over) that can make a wingless craft fly under the power and direct effect of high voltages of electricity directly interfacing with its hull? The answer is in the books and you can replicate it too.
I do not address the second question in my books at all. You are free with me to believe whatever you want. I am not a debunker. I do not write about aliens, I leave the topic arena at the propulsion systems level, that we possess and are capable of building.
None of these books are threatening your belief in aliens.
Not I, nor anyone who works with me is challenging the existence of extra-terrestrial life. I do not address that topic in these books. These books are about UFO technology that you can replicate, because even though the craft look other-worldly, 3400+ pages of that evidence was provided by people from this planet.
Regards,
by
Luke Fortune (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments)
on Friday, February 29, 2008 at 1:19:54 PM
To conclude that all UFO’s, as you seem to imply, can be neatly explained away by human technological patents and engineering activity is about a thousand times MORE preposterous than the theory that the inexplicable craft in our skies come from other places in our universe. It’s nothing more than human ignorance and close-minded arrogance that desperately needs to believe we are perfectly alone, a fluke of the universe, and therefore supremely special. What is it? Genuine open-mindedness, you think? A feeling of being threatened? A fear we might not be everything we crack ourselves up to be? Your assumptions also insult and discredit thousands of responsible eyewitnesses, who KNOW for the greater part that what they witnessed - and/or came into direct contact with - are not of human origin. Wake up! The universe is virtually teeming with life, and much of it is older, wiser and considerably more peaceful than we are.
by
Marcus Hunt (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments)
on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 2:34:24 PM
