Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (16 comments)

Survey: Support for national health insurance grows among physicians

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

We can stop taking everyone else’s word for how U.S. physicians feel about national health insurance. When surveyed, 59 percent say they now support national health insurance, a 10 percent increase in support from five years ago.

According to a survey undertaken last year by Indiana University School of Medicine and published in the April 1 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, support for national health insurance is strongest among psychiatrists (83 percent), pediatric sub-specialists (71 percent), emergency medicine physicians (69 percent), general pediatricians (65 percent), general internists (64 percent) and family physicians (60 percent).

Support from general surgeons has doubled since 2002, with 55 percent now backing national health insurance.

“Across the board, more physicians feel that our fragmented and for-profit insurance system is obstructing good patient care, and a majority now support national insurance as the remedy,” said study co-author Ronald T. Ackermann, associate director of the Center for Health Policy and Professionalism Research at Indiana University’s School of Medicine.

There were some exceptions. Less than 50 percent of surgical specialists, radiologists, and anesthesiologists support establishment of a national health insurance program.

There are an estimated 47 million uninsured in the United States, according to the latest Census, and another 50 million who are underinsured. 

A Medicare-for-all type system was proposed by Physicians for a National Health program, a national organization with 15,000 members, in 2003, and published in JAMA. It was the impetus for the proposed National Health Insurance Act (HR 676) introduced in 2006 by U.S. Representatives John Conyers (D-Michigan) and Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio).  

Even with physician support and a clear majority of support from citizens, a national health care program is more likely to come from incremental enactment through individual states rather than through federal legislation. HR 676 is stagnant with 88 co-sponsors. No new action has been taken on the bill since February 2007 when it was referred to two subcommittees on health. 


Single-payor proponent

About the survey: 

  • 5000 questionnaires were mailed to physicians in the American Medical Association’s database
  • Response rate of 51 percent (2,193 completed surveys)
  • Results: 59 supported legislation to create a national health insurance program, 9 percent were neutral and 32 percent opposed
  • Among those that opposed, 14 percent supported incremental reforms

Source: Carroll AE, Ackerman RT. Support for National Health Insurance Among U.S. Physicians: 5 Years Later Ann Intern Med.2008; 148: 566-567

 

Kathlyn Stone is a Minnesota-based writer covering science and medicine, health care and related policies.-She publishes www.fleshandstone.net, a health and science news site.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Doctoring the numbers. by Wolfie on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:01:13 PM
Thanks, Wolfie by Kathlyn Stone on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:44:56 PM
Minnesota Go-for-its, rah rah rah by Wolfie on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:41:49 PM
The land of 10,000 lakes has become land of 10,000 fees by Kathlyn Stone on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:47:50 PM
88 Praise worthy Congress People by August Adams on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:41:16 PM
Universal Wealth Care. by douglas kay on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:50:06 PM
In other, other words by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:24:06 AM
The Nuts and Bolts of Being Screwed by Wolfie on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:18:41 PM
As Emily LaTella said by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:10:44 PM
It can't be national health care INSURANCE! by Caronome on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:10:16 AM
Single Payer, Not for Profit Health Care! by August Adams on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:16:12 PM
Time to Separate the Wheat from the Chaff by Bob Gormley on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:11:28 AM
Where's Kucinich when we need him? by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:31:15 AM
He is where the Democrats wanted him to be... Blackballed. by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:37:32 PM
Dugg and Reddit! Go Shrinks; 83% Support National Heathcare by Better World Order on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:58:25 AM
whoops, my bad link by Better World Order on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:00:02 AM