Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
9 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Sci Tech

Breaking News: Science validates key Mayan Calendar premise

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Fresh this week, in the New York Times and hundreds of media outlets across the country, is the reported discovery that human evolution has accelerated far more swiftly over the last 40,000 years than had ever been realized.

This not only contradicts earlier assumptions that our physical/mental evolution supposedly stabilized that long ago, but it validates the underlying basis of the Mayan Calendar, a radically different way of understanding time that has only recently come to be understood — and is still outside the mainstream framework of such considerations.

According to the NY Times in a copyrighted article by Nicholas Wade, the discovery was made through a more intensive analysis of the human genetic structure, and is assumed to derive from the continuing effect of natural selection.

The news is meaningful to all concerned with the course of human development; but it is a breakthrough validation for those who understand the significance of the Mayan Calendar, which holds that we are swiftly moving toward some wholly new epoch, just a short four years away. Some hold this time to be the year 2012, while others foresee it a year earlier.

While our common calendar merely tracks the steady, repetitive course of Earth's annual circuit of the sun (resulting in our familiar seasons, due to the constant tilt of Earth's axis), the so-called Mayan Calendar had a completely different focus: it was purportedly tracking the course of human evolvement over time; and more specifically, human consciousness.

How was this possible for what we today regard as a primitive culture? This remains a matter of conjecture; but the analysis of their calendar structure (it was actually one of several calendars they used, for different purposes) leaves little doubt about its intended function.


Developed by the Mayans in central Mexico about a thousand years ago, and recently interpreted from stone carvings, along with remnant rituals still performed in the native culture, this calendar posits a tightly defined series of time-passages: nine levels that can be visualized as steps, for each beyond the first was only one-twentieth the length (in time) as the previous one. And within each such level, a division into thirteen equidistant stages.

Each level was said to constellate a coherent span of human development, and the thirteen stages within that level could be seen as stages of evolvement somewhat similar to the stages of seasonal growth in the course of Nature's year. Much more detail on this can be found in the study, The Mayan Calendar and the Transformation of Consciousness by Dr. Carl Johan Calleman (2004).

Such a schema naturally narrows down toward an 'end time', and it's this end-time which now swiftly approaches. No one can say what it will bring, but speculation is rife. The really interesting thing about it is that it tallied – time-wise – with other supposed 'end times' that derive from entirely different (and unrelated) sources of speculation.

It is a broad area for consideration, but the important thing of the moment is the newly provable validation of this idea that development – not cultural or scientific, but actual human development – has been speeding up at a significant rate, for that idea resides at the very heart of the Mayan Calendar thesis.

Here is an elaborating observation written for Scientific American by David Biello, who says quite directly, "comparing the amount of genetic differentiation between humans and our closest relatives, chimpanzees, suggests that the pace of change has accelerated to 10 to 100 times the average long-term rate, the researchers write in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA."

Or this by John Roach, from National Geographic: "The pace of change accelerated about 40,000 years ago and then picked up even more with the advent of agriculture about 10,000 years ago..."

There is greater detail in the study being referenced, and speculation as to the proximate cause of such remarkably accelerated change, but basic to all of it is the fact of it, which is totally supportive of those who subscribe to the notion of hugely significant change that is shortly ahead of us.

 

www.irvthomas.com

Irv Thomas, ratrace escapee and cultural outsider for 35 years, editor of Black Bart Brigade during counter-culture days, hides out in Seattle. Presently putting out a sporadic pre-formatted email newsletter called Irv's Scrapbook, which can be had (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Breaking News: Science validates key Mayan Calendar premise

9/11 - The seventh anniversary is a point of 'maturity'

Bush makes it clear: He will only listen to impeachment

On this very day, 65 years ago...

The Hidden Reason Republicans Fear Impeachment

Lost in the Shuffle: Last Weekend's Impeachment Rallies

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I don't know about the Mayas (tho doomsday in ... by Laudyms on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:30:29 PM
Not that it should make any great difference, for ... by Irvthom on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:06:24 PM
What? when? how and what's the proof.....or wh... by Andris on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 3:23:03 PM
You can read about Toba at http://en.wikipedia.org... by Laudyms on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 9:49:11 PM
Aside from the fact that the Toba event and its pr... by Irvthom on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 11:26:00 PM
But like the author of the essay I don't see t... by Andris on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 2:07:42 AM
more on the speed-up issue (see site for many link... by Laudyms on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 6:58:40 PM
it's culture not genetics that impacts us.&nbs... by Laudyms on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 7:02:14 PM
1. READ THE BOOK "Solving the Greatest M... by Drew Terry on Monday, Dec 17, 2007 at 1:42:11 PM