America's silent killers are deadly, and do not discriminate. They target babies, the elderly, teenagers, young adults, middle-age housewives, and businessmen alike. They poison livestock, pets, and wildlife, and the people behind them deny complicity in the carnage. Who or what are these silent, deadly killers? They are the beautiful, green, uniform, and seemingly beneficial, killing fields of genetically modified (GMO) crops. The people behind them are the U.S. government, the Rockefellers, Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, and Syngenta.
How it Began
Eugenics is a dirty word, yet particularly applicable to America's killing fields and their inception:
Henry Kissinger drafted the controversial NSSM-200 in 1974, called “the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government.” According to NSSM-200, elements of the implementation of population control programs could include: the legalization of abortion; financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates; indoctrination of children; mandatory population control, and coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless an LDC implements population control programs.
NSSM-200 also specifically declared that the United States was to cover up its population control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations to do its dirty work.
(Human Life International, 2008)
In 1970, Henry Kissinger said, "Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people." How do you control food? By consolidating agricultural interests into what was to be termed agribusiness, creating genetically modified organisms out of heritage seeds with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, patenting the new seeds, and making sure that these new seeds are force-fed to U.S. farmers as well as the rest of the world. By holding the patents on these seeds and requiring farmers to purchase new seeds every year, the control is complete. Also, by controlling how these GMO seeds are created, other more sinister uses come to mind. But first, you must convince the world of your good intentions. This is accomplished through lies, deception, and a bit of media manipulation. By promising farmers that this technology was safe, and would result in increased yields at less cost, they were more than happy to give it a try. The fact that in most cases this claim was false had yet to be proven by the innocent farmers that believed the lie.
By the time independent studies started revealing that GMO is harmful, it was too late, and the freight train called agri-business was on its way to fulfilling its purpose - to make as much money as possible by spreading GMO seeds as far as possible, and thus gaining control of the population via food.
The U.S. Farmland Takeover
It is now 2008, and the U.S. is in the midst of a deadly trend. From time-tested agricultural processes that involve tilling the land, planting, and harvesting both produce and seed, to mass-produced, genetically engineered seed injection requiring less workers and more pesticides, agribusiness has taken hold and is strangling the country with its GMO crops and farming methods. The end-result? The family farmer is squeezed out in favor of agribusiness' mass-production methods using genetically engineered crops grown with poisoned seeds, good for one harvest only. Here are some statistics that show how GMO crops are taking over U.S. farmland:
The adoption of HT [herbicide-tolerant] corn, which had been slower in previous years, has accelerated, reaching 52 percent of U.S. corn acreage in 2007.
Plantings of Bt [insect-resistant] corn grew from 8 percent of U.S. corn acreage in 1997 to 26 percent in 1999, then fell to 19 percent in 2000 and 2001, before climbing to 29 percent in 2003 and 49 percent in 2007. Plantings of Bt cotton expanded more rapidly, from 15 percent of U.S. cotton acreage in 1997 to 37 percent in 2001 and 59 percent in 2007.
Adoption of all GE [genetically engineered] cotton, taking into account the acreage with either or both HT and Bt traits, reached 87 percent in 2007, versus 91 percent for soybeans. In contrast, adoption of all biotech corn was 73 percent. (USDA, 2007)
The Killing Fields go Worldwide
Not content to restrict the use of GMO to the U.S., a larger, more ambitious plan was in the making.
By Presidential Executive Order [1992], the US had defined GMO seeds as harmless and hence not needing to be regulated for health and safety. It made sure this principle was carried over into the new World Trade Organization (WTO) in the form of the WTO's Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (SPS), which stated, 'Food standards and measures aimed at protecting people from pests or animals can potentially be used as a deliberate barrier to trade'...
Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.
The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her desk drawer, and she counts herself in the category of Writer/Activist.
Someday she will make money writing, but that is not why she does it. "I do it because I must. A driving force compels me to reach out to others with what I learn about the condition we the people are in, and that is what I devote my time to. After all, time is the most precious thing we have, and the older I get the more I want to use it wisely."
Barbara lives on a small ranch in Oregon with her husband, where they raise geese, chickens, Navajo Churro sheep, Oggie Dog, a variety of cats, and an opinionated Macaw named Rita. She believes that self-sufficiency and localization of food sources will be necessary to survive the coming depression. To this end, she has put up a website to share information at:
http://survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com.
Her philosophy is this: You are on this earth for a reason - to fight for the light. Your words are swords that penetrate the darkness with truth and light. You have a purpose.
A little known fact is that Abu Ghraib was not only a source of experimental torture, but held the Iraqi seed vault that contained the heritage seeds of Iraqi agriculture. This seed vault was destroyed by the U.S. during the war. To re-build Iraqi farms, guess what kind of seeds they were given? Well, they asked, but were not told. However, if they were GMO, and I am certain they were, the Iraqis will be seed serfs shortly because not only will they have to pay royalties to companies such as Monsanto, but will have to purchase seeds year after year, as well as chemicals from these same companies year after year to use on the plants. This information was taken from William Engdahl's Seeds of Destruction. I highly recommend this book.
by
Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 80 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 416 comments)
on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 at 6:04:25 PM
A farmer whose corn had consistently won blue ribbons at the state fair was asked why he persisted in giving his seed to his neighbors, since that would represent increased competition for him .
He answered simply: "Because....
My crops are only as good as those of my neighbors'"
by
Bia Winter (1 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 169 comments)
on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 7:49:59 AM
Has anyone thought about the bees and what's been happening to them? Perhaps there's an answer here.
It doesn't stop with botanicals in our food chain.
The bird flu scare has pulled pharmaceutical companies like Gideon in California out of the red with a faux vaccine for a bogus flu. Donald Rumsfeld's stock in Gideon rose to almost $100 million in 2006. Coincidence? Perhaps.
Raising the fear level for this bogus flu has incited the beginning of the destruction of domestic bird populations world wide. Domestic bird populations soon to be replaced by genetically altered, rfid chipped birds.
This is already being done in Asia, China in particular. Don't think for a minute that China's chickens are out of our food chain. Companies like Tyson import poultry from China, package and ship it to supermarkets in the US.
Until we get the country of origin printed on our labeling, I'm sticking to neighborhood farms for my family's food source.
by
grassroots (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 39 comments)
on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 at 7:02:32 PM
Lyme disease was also hatched right off New York's Plum Island, where a Gov.lab run by ex-("offensive" word starting with N, rhymes with Yahtzi) scientists accidently released it and infected deer and birds.
It is "designed" to keep mutating, making it especially hard to treat and understand.
by
Bia Winter (1 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 169 comments)
on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 7:44:13 AM
I listen to Derry Brownfield, and the other day he talked about another facility in the planning stages where all harmful disease organisms will be stored that affect farm animals. He also revealed a manual by the U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization titled Manual on Procedures for Disease Eradication by Stamping Out. This manual is a disease eradication program that details the ways to kill farm animals in the event of a disease outbreak. He put two and two together, and the result is sickening. First you have the manual for stamping out disease, then you place a center such as the one you mention that contains all the disease organisms right in the middle of livestock country, and these centers have a history of leaking diseases. It doesn't take rocket science to figure out what is going to happen.
by
Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 80 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 416 comments)
on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 9:34:46 AM
Ms. Winters, Lyme Disease has been "known" for about a hundred years now; it wasn't called as such until the late 1970s. Its symptoms, though, were first associated with a then unknown disease in Europe in 1908. The same association didn't occur in the US until 1975. Further research in the early 1980s confirmed that both the European and American symptoms were associated with a common bacterium - the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi - http://www.im.microbios.org/13march01/BR3%20Karlen-Margulis.pdf .
Differing vectors exist in Europe and the US, but the spirochete is common to both locales. It's only the bug that carries the "nasty" that differs. Now, unless you're alleging that this origin is a lie, I think your assertion that the bacterium was produced in a lab is fatally-flawed.
by
Tom Murphy (3 articles, 4 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 1708 comments)
on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 12:27:57 PM
I partially agree with you Tom, that originally Lyme disease might not have been created in a lab. However, there is evidence to suggest that the Lyme Disease epidemic might have originated from Plum Island's lab (LINK).
The Plum Island website, which was last modified in 2005, makes the following claim:
We're proud of our role as America's first line of defense against foreign animal diseases.
We're equally proud of our safety record. Not once in our nearly 50 years of operation has an animal pathogen escaped from the island.
However, according to a New York Times article in 2002 titled "Power Fails for 3 Hours at Plum Island Infectious Disease Lab," (LINK)
The latest incident was made public when a replacement worker notified members of Senator Clinton's staff of the power failure. In an interview, the worker, who insisted on anonymity, said, ''The reason I am coming forward is because what I have seen at the center is really out of hand and something needs to be done about it.'' Requests by The New York Times to visit the island have been rejected.
The power failure is the first time the possibility of a leak of the pathogens studied on the island has been raised.
Evidently, the 2002 possible leak of pathogens is not something the Plum Island website takes into account. One has to wonder just how many other instances like this have occured in the past that Plum Island simply did not tell the public.
Sandy Miller Hays, spokesperson for the USDA stated:
With the power out, the filtering would have stopped, but experts thought that the overall pressure of the facility would probably have stayed low enough to have limited the risk of a leak.
"Limiting the risk of a leak" is not the same as eliminating the risk of a leak, and "probably" is not the same as definitely. The words "probably" and "limiting the risk" are double-speak for "well, it might have happened, but we don't think it did, but cannot guarantee it." Not good enough. If there was a leak due to either sloppiness or calculation, the result is the same. A leak is a leak.
by
Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 80 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 416 comments)
on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 1:44:51 PM
I've heard that almost all of the so-called organic seeds already are or are becoming contaminated. I heard this from www.mercola.com, which I highly suggest you visit and subscribe to its weekly newsletter. One article is "The Global Blight of Genetically Modified Crops" among many others. You can support local farms, but even those are in trouble and are being subverted by the giant food corporations. We should all push for and support any legislation dealing with ANYTHING natural/organic: hopefully that will be enough.
by
Doosen Tachia (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 8 comments)
on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 at 10:08:46 AM
9 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....