Tags for This Article:

Torture (1336)  Guantanamo Prison (367)  Health Psychology-Mental Health (180)  Abu Ghraib (101)  Abu Ghraib (90) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
February 28, 2007 at 11:17:41

New Perspectives on the Psychology of Evil; Why Good People Do Bad Things

by Stephen Soldz     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Philip Zimbardo, the psychologist who conducted the classic Stanford Prison Experiment has a new piece in Yale Alumni Magazine using the Milgram experiments on obedience to authority as a jumping off point to defend the situationist view that evil is largely the result of people being placed in evil-producing situations. The piece is adapted from Zimbardo's forthcoming book The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil.

Psychological situationism (as distinct from the Situationist political movement of the 1960's and 70's) is an important trend in social psychology that emphasizes the importance of situations, as opposed to personal dispositions, in generating particular behaviors. Psychologist Walter Mischel popularized situationism in 1968 with his argument that situations were more powerful than dispositional traits in predicting behavior. This work dealt a blow to personality psychology. Over the succeeding decades personality psychologists refined their work and showed that dispositional differences among individuals do, indeed, exist and predict average behavior fairly well. Thus, dispositional extroversion may not be a good predictor of whether an individual will attend a particular party, but it is a good predictor of how many parties the person is likely to attend in a year.



Milgram and Zimbardo's work demonstrates that, sometimes, the power of situations can be overpowering. This power is frequently underemphasized, including by by psychoanalytic colleagues. But the situationists are also sometimes guilty of underemphasizing the effects of dispositional differences. Mischel, himself, eventually developed a more complex view of the relationship of personality and situation to behavior. He eventually generated strong evidence of the power of dispositional differences in "impulse control" in young children to predict life functioning many years later. I have also generated evidence that personality in college predicts life course functioning in many domains [The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 50-year longitudinal study].

In any case, the situationists are surely right that evil-producing situations play a large role in the generation of evil. Institutions like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo exist to abuse those detained there. If one wants to stop this abuse, one must change the institutions that create it. Merely punishing the "evil-doers" as if they are "a few bad apples" is largely a distraction from the required institutional change. If one wants to look for evil-doers, look first at those who created the situation, rather than at those who acted badly under the situational pressures created by the designers. For American torture, efforts at change, and at punishment, should look at the true perpetrators, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Gonzales.

Here is an excerpt from Zimbardo on the application of situationist ideas to the understanding of torture:

Arendt's phrase "the banality of evil" continues to resonate because genocide has been unleashed around the world and torture and terrorism continue to be common features of our global landscape. A few years ago, the sociologist and Brazil expert Martha Huggins, the Greek psychologist and torture expert Mika Haritos-Fatouros, and I interviewed several dozen torturers. These men did their daily dirty deeds for years in Brazil as policemen, sanctioned by the government to get confessions by torturing "subversive" enemies of the state.

The systematic torture by men of their fellow men and women represents one of the darkest sides of human nature. Surely, my colleagues and I reasoned, here was a place where dispositional evil would be manifest. The torturers shared a common enemy: men, women, and children who, though citizens of their state, even neighbors, were declared by "the System" to be threats to the country's national security -- as socialists and Communists. Some had to be eliminated efficiently, while others, who might hold secret information, had to be made to yield it up by torture, confess and then be killed.

Torture always involves a personal relationship; it is essential for the torturer to understand what kind of torture to employ, what intensity of torture to use on a certain person at a certain time. Wrong kind or too little -- no confession. Too much -- the victim dies before confessing. In either case, the torturer fails to deliver the goods and incurs the wrath of the senior officers. Learning to determine the right kind and degree of torture that yields up the desired information elicits abounding rewards and flowing praise from one's superiors. It took time and emerging insights into human weaknesses for these torturers to become adept at their craft.

What kind of men could do such deeds? Did they need to rely on sadistic impulses and a history of sociopathic life experiences to rip and tear the flesh of fellow beings day in and day out for years on end?

We found that sadists are selected out of the training process by trainers because they are not controllable. They get off on the pleasure of inflicting pain, and thus do not sustain the focus on the goal of extracting confessions. From all the evidence we could muster, torturers were not unusual or deviant in any way prior to practicing their new roles, nor were there any persisting deviant tendencies or pathologies among any of them in the years following their work as torturers and executioners. Their transformation was entirely explainable as being the consequence of a number of situational and systemic factors, such as the training they were given to play this new role; their group camaraderie; acceptance of the national security ideology; and their learned belief in socialists and Communists as enemies of their state.


He then goes on to discuss the similarities in the processes producing torturers and those producing Palestinian suicide bombers. Read the whole piece!

 

http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/

Stephen Soldz is psychoanalyst, psychologist, public health researcher, and faculty member at the Institute for the Study of Violence of the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis. He is a member of Roslindale Neighbors for Peace and Justice. He maintains the Psyche, Science, and Society blog.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

* * * * *

Tim Riley is a father, husband, technical writer, and internet news hound avidly interested in progressive politics, environmentalism, social justice, and playing with his two children.

Tim Riley* * * * *

Tim Riley is a father, husband, technical writer, and internet news hound avidly interested in progressive politics, environmentalism, social justice, and playing with his two children.

Action item for my to do list: Create positive situations

Since "evil producing situations play a large role in the generation of evil" then we must work to reduce the number and locations available for evil to fester hidden from polite society.

War is a hell in which horrors like collateral damage, brutal carnage, and suspension of human rights are justified. Let us work to revoke the Authorization for the Use of Military Force of 2003 to force our figureheads to use diplomacy and negotiation without childish threats of violence when they grow tired of working toward compromise. It has been way too easy for this administration to fabricate perceived threats and situations conducive to violence anywhere anyone may oppose them.

The activists protesting the existence of what was formerly known as the "School of the Americas" in Fort Benning, GA and those who advocate a permanent Department of Peace are also on the right track.

I think that the black operations budget needs to be brought into the sunshine of public scrutiny. Huge sums of money can be hidden in regular departmental budgets without risking national security. State secrets breed a lack of accountability that can't be tolerated in a free society.

Congressional oversight has been too weak (politically distracted every two years) to mount a campaign against the institutionalized, self-perpetuating hierarchies, and barrels of bad apples within black budgets. A permanent congressional oversight office with the highest security clearances must be charged with investigation and pursuit of any allegations of systemic human rights abuses and extra-legal activities under cover of covert black operations. Torture, renditions, human rights abuses, and international meddling should not be tolerated in a free and democratic society. Enormous bureaucracies that perpetuate this kind of abusive and evil behavior require restructuring, powerful ombudsmen, and reinstatement of protections and security for whistleblowers.

If the power of situation can create evil behavior, then the sick and diseased structures that allow indefinite detentions without accusation or trial, torture by sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, and psychological abuse must be changed or removed from existence.

Perhaps we need to leverage the power of situation and foster constructive and loving environments conducive to creative and thoughtful solutions empowering individuals to take highly moral and virtuous stands. If people can be trained to be torturers, surely they can be trained to disciplined and highly moral defenders of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Probably 97% of the military would be very happy to defend the Constitution and not oil fields on the other side of the planet.

by Tim Riley (7 articles, 5 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 130 comments) on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 6:06:37 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

CBS's Spoiled Poodle Dean Reynolds Bites Obama-- Reports his Plane Smells by Rob Kall

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

Return of the Jedi by Ferdinand

How low can Palin go? by Deb Della Piana

Onward, Christian Soldiers (Redux) by Shirley Bianchi

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular