Ms. Toole, You have neglected many basic facts in your coverage of the Texas Governors' Debate. To correct the most glaring problem in your coverage: Ann Richards did in fact push through the Texas Lottery, promising a huge boost to Education funding. However, this simply did not happen under her tenure. She was the first, followed by Bush and Perry, to in fact NOT use most of the proceeds from our lottery to benefit Education. Instead a private company, under the "Commission" benefits most, followed by the General Fund. One cannot blame our current Governor for this fiasco, as it was not of his creation. Richards was the saleswoman of a program never meant to be, and we bought it hook, line, and sinker. Also, remember that when Governor Richards was in office our state was posting those upper-forties rankings in Education. I cannot say that Perry has been the benefactor of the current rise in funding, rankings and scores, as the Texas Governor's office is essentially powerless when it comes to legislation, another consideration you do not delve into. But again, the rankings are better now, under his administration, most likely a coincidence. As for the Trans-Texas Corridor: No matter who becomes Governor, or remains for that matter, this project will go forward as planned. This isn't some local development, but rather a small piece of a national project, one approved long ago and set in motion for years. We the citizenry had, and continue to have, many opportunities to comment and lobby publicly through the quasi-governmental agency itself: http://www.keeptexasmoving.org/ In fact, SH-130, a major facet of the program, is nearing completion if you haven't driven out to see. Thus, this facet of the debate is a none-issue. Also, when discussing Governor Perry's faults one should always consider his saving graces, as one should when discussing anything of a political nature. Just last week the Governor announced his explicit funding (that good ol' General Fund) of a series of Wind Power projects, a continuing development since Bush began the program in the late 90s. Take a look at the Texas Enterprise Fund too: click here This program, started under Perry and enabled using the General Fund, provides start-up funding to innovative new companies in the medical and technological fields. Texas engineers and scientists have a long history of dynamic innovation, providing life-saving breakthroughs in medical devices, medicine, and even culture altering developments in communications technology and the Internet. This Enterprise Fund will create billions of dollars for Texas' economy, much of the lion share going to small start-ups, locally owned business that impact the world. Chris Bell, as you so succinctly point out, is concise and statistical, a cold fish in the mold of Kerry. Is this who you want leading and inspiring your state’s future outlook and economic advantage? Again, the Governor is powerless enough as it is, has little to no impact on legislation. So what would a Congressman accomplish as Governor in Texas? The Texas Governor could almost be thought of as the state’s CEO or New Business Developer. That’s what his/her job allows for. I must agree with you that Kinky Friedman is the most interesting and likeable of all candidates. Any controversies surrounding his remarks are simply corporate-media-machine hype meant to disgruntle any potential voters, especially the minorities. His statements are continually taken out of context, and words are even put in his mouth, grossly misquoting. His program for legalization or decriminalization of marijuana is a beautiful idea, provided the citizen base of the state was properly educated regarding the drug and its consequences. As you’ve said well, alcohol is much more damaging to both the body and society, yet it’s very legal and awfully regulated. Being a libertarian-with-a-little-“l”, I find myself most attracted to Kinky and his basic ideas. However, again, he will not be able to accomplish much in terms of legislation, faced with what would be a very hostile House and Senate, one that could even join hands and rally against him. And, as mentioned, the citizenry is simply ignorant as to how proper many of his proposals really are. So, here we are with a bit of a predicament: The Governor is not powerful as a legislator, being essentially a businessman representing the state’s economy. As a fiscally conservative, socially tolerant individual, (and knowing that the Governor will not be capable of restricting my social rights) I look for which candidate would provide the best economic sensibility and future to the State as a whole (looking to the Lt. Governor and Legislature regarding social law). As best I can tell, Governor Perry is the obvious choice. However, that doesn’t mean I won’t be voting for Kinky. Anything we the independent voters can do to legitimize indie candidates and platforms creates a foundation that the future can build from. Will Kinky become Governor? Not likely… Will an even more ideal candidate come along within the next decade who can build from Kinky’s success? Absolutely. Regards, EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Saturday, Oct 7, 2006 at 1:53:03 PM

  (0+)

I am a Kinky volunteer myself, and recently took a day off from work in order to work at his 24 hour registration drive ay Katz's on 6th St, here in Austin, as I am also a Deputy Reigstrar. I have also distributed Kinky signs all over the county in which I live, but every single one of them was stolen within a day! I am not sure if I believe your facts about Ms. Richards, and the Education Fund, as she was a personal family friend, and my mother worked with her on several campaigns. Ms. Richards also supported Women's Right to Choose, and Planned Parenthood, which I feel is vital. See, my mother was very political, and got my sister and I involved at a very young age. When I was seven, I was in the Senate House when they passed the Equal Rights Amendment. As for Perry, and the Wind Power Projects, I think that this was mentioned only for the voter's benefit. If the idea started in the 90's, why hasn't it come to fruition? As for your stance on education, the fact that Texas is one of the richest states, and has one of the worst records should tell you something about Bush and Perry. Ms. Richards was only there for four years; something you seem to have forgotten, and maybe that wasn't long enough to help our distressed system, but the republicans have had FAR longer to deal with this crucial issue. It is unethical to give a HUGE contract to a FOREIGN company, and receive campaign FUNDING from them. This, alone shows what Perry's true values are. If the TTC must be built, then why didn't TEXAS contractors receive the bid? Perry's statement about teachers receiving raises is not true here in Austin. I have a personal friend that hasn't had a raise in over three years. If they don't get paid enough, who is going to want that job? I think that education should come first, as our children are the future. If you want to vote for Perry because you believe that he will promote technology in Texas, then that's your right. Austin is alreay known as the other Silicon Valley, so, to me it's a moot point. Perry was appointed by President Bush; the man who wants RFID chips in our driver's licenses, approves of torture/even of American citizens, or "lawful combatants," and the man who has lied about the reason for us to spend billions of dollars in what has become a civil war, while his cronies reap profits as warmongers. I am still voting for Kinky as I am an ardent supporter, but I just don't know how this one is going to turn out. I hope that other independent voters, such as yourself, don't fall for the republican propaganda like you may have. Pres. Bush wanted the TTC, and since Perry owes him for his appointment, he passed it. Perry is Bush's lapdog in Texas, and whenever Bush wants something to pass in Texas, of course Perry will back it up. Let's not forget Perry's help in redistricting of the Texas districts, which of course was illegal. The TX. Statute states that "only in times of emergency," will re-districting be allowed. There never was an emergency, and now representatives have these districts that have been chopped up to the republican's advantage. Many of them are unhappy about this re-districting, and it was a dirty move by your choice for office. The RFID chips for Driver's licenses are supposed to be a state matter, not a Federal one, and since Bush wants them, even though they violate our civil liberties, and are a violation of privacy, Perry will make sure that this passes; even if he has to use his veto power. This is another sure sign that Perry is part of Bushco., and will do whatever his Master tells him to. When will this stop? Ann Richards implemented several positive programs concerning rehabilitation of drug offendors, which decreases rates of recidivism. She also worked to help implement health and employment programs for women, minorities, those with disabilities, and the impoverished. In other words, she was attempting to help those most in need. I sincerely hope that you will educate yourself more about Friedman, and Bell, before dismissing them for a Governor who hasn't really had an impact in over seven years. Go to; www.kinkyfriedman.com to find out more about his agenda that he wasn't given a chance to bring up. Have a wonderful day, whomever "ejpreston" may be. I sign all of my correspondence because I am not afraid of debate. What is your excuse?

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 2:53:06 PM

  (0+)

I am a Kinky volunteer myself, and recently took a day off from work in order to work at his 24 hour registration drive ay Katz's on 6th St, here in Austin, as I am also a Deputy Registrar. I have also distributed Kinky signs all over the county in which I live, but every single one of them was stolen within a day! I am not sure if I believe your facts about Ms. Richards, and the Education Fund, as she was a personal family friend, and my mother worked with her on several campaigns. Ms. Richards also supported Women's Right to Choose, and Planned Parenthood, which I feel is vital. See, my mother was very political, and got my sister and I involved at a very young age. When I was seven, I was in the Senate House when they passed the Equal Rights Amendment. As for Perry, and the Wind Power Projects, I think that this was mentioned only for the voter's benefit. If the idea started in the 90's, why hasn't it come to fruition? As for your stance on education, the fact that Texas is one of the richest states, and has one of the worst records should tell you something about Bush and Perry. Ms. Richards was only there for four years; something you seem to have forgotten, and maybe that wasn't long enough to help our distressed system, but the republicans have had FAR longer to deal with this crucial issue. It is unethical to give a HUGE contract to a FOREIGN company, and receive campaign FUNDING from them. This, alone shows what Perry's true values are. If the TTC must be built, then why didn't TEXAS contractors receive the bid? Perry's statement about teachers receiving raises is not true here in Austin. I have a personal friend that hasn't had a raise in over three years. If they don't get paid enough, who is going to want that job? I think that education should come first, as our children are the future. If you want to vote for Perry because you believe that he will promote technology in Texas, then that's your right. Austin is already known as the other Silicon Valley, so, to me it's a moot point. Perry was appointed by President Bush; the man who wants RFID chips in our driver's licenses, approves of torture/even of American citizens, or "lawful combatants," and the man who has lied about the reason for us to spend billions of dollars in what has become a civil war, while his cronies reap profits as warmongers. I am still voting for Kinky as I am an ardent supporter, but I just don't know how this one is going to turn out. I hope that other independent voters, such as yourself, don't fall for the republican propaganda like you may have. Pres. Bush wanted the TTC, and since Perry owes him for his appointment, he passed it. Perry is Bush's lapdog in Texas, and whenever Bush wants something to pass in Texas, of course Perry will back it up. Let's not forget Perry's help in redistricting of the Texas districts, which of course was illegal. The TX. Statute states that "only in times of emergency," will re-districting be allowed. There never was an emergency, and now representatives are in these districts that have been chopped up to the republican's advantage. Many of them are unhappy about this re-districting, and it was a dirty move by your choice for office. The RFID chips for Driver's licenses are supposed to be a state matter, not a Federal one, and since Bush wants them, even though they violate our civil liberties, and are a violation of privacy, Perry will make sure that this passes; even if he has to use his veto power. This is another sure sign that Perry is part of Bushco., and will do whatever his Master tells him to. When will this stop? Ann Richards implemented several positive programs concerning rehabilitation of drug offendors, which decreases rates of recidivism. She also worked to help implement health and employment programs for women, minorities, those with disabilities, and the impoverished. In other words, she was attempting to help those most in need. I sincerely hope that you will educate yourself more about Friedman, and Bell, before dismissing them for a Governor who hasn't really had an impact in over seven years. Go to: www.kinkyfriedman.com to find out more about his agenda that he wasn't given a chance to bring up. Have a wonderful day, whomever "ejpreston" may be. I sign all of my correspondence because I am not afraid of debate. What is your excuse? Sincerely, Sara Scafe Toole

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 2:57:09 PM

  (0+)

Sara, Wow... Okay, so first off, let me be VERY clear. My name is EJ (Edward John) Preston, as signed at the bottom of my comment/email. This leads me to believe that, since you didn't even see the name signed at the end of my comment, you may very well have not read through the comment itself in a thorough manner. Another matter to be very clear on: I am voting for Kinky Friedman, as stated in my message. I have been a Kinky supporter since well before he announced his candidacy, slapping a sticker on my bumper back in '04. And you? I agree that there is an inherit problem in giving such a huge contract to a foreign company... On the other hand, there's not a single firm in Texas that has the expertise to actually plan and develop the Trans Texas Corridor. Now, is there one in the USA somewhere? Possibly... I welcome a WELL RESEARCHED retort to this claim. As for teachers recieving raises... So one friend makes a researched survey? Perhaps, and I don't mean to slander, your pal is not deserving of a raise. MANY teachers throughout the state, especially younger and more productive ones, have recieved starting salaries and raises that are well-above the previous years' rates. Please look this information up before you state that no teachers are being paid more, it shows shoddy research and intent. As for Richards, Bell, and the Texas Dems in general... Sara, it sounds like you haven't "woken up", a term used by many libertarians and patriot movement types to describe a politico, on EITHER side of the fence, those that seem to blindly support one party or another based simply on upbrining, which is VERY apparent in your case. The right to choose is great! But politicians do NOT have the right to legislate such issues in the first place, as clearly stated in the Bill of Rights. Thus, the act of even considering the notion that Goverment is "giving you the right, or permission" to choose or do what you will with your own body is a red herring. WE THE PEOPLE have this right, and the right to legitimize our government in the first place, and no government at any level can neither take it away or give it back. Any legislation purporting to do so is unconstitutional. Your issues raised regarding Bushco., etc are irrelevant in this context (though I do agree that they're a den of vipers and such, as is the Clinton mafia, who are in business with the Bushes and others). That's all that needed to be said there. In terms of anything Richards, Democrats, Republicans alike, and just about all majorly embedded politicians, do to "advance the cause of equal rights", etc: These are ruses meant to give us the impression that they actually care. When, in fact, they are nearly all bought and sold by the special interests, both sides of the fence. I can point to merely a handful of well known Congressmen or such that are truly "citizen legislators". Personally, Sara, I do not believe in politics. I believe in citizen legislation, as idealized in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. A major problem in this country is the degree to which nearly every man and woman believes that one party or another is "right" or has a "solution" to our woes. Bullshit. None of them do. We the people do, and until we take back our government, we're going to continue recieving the short end of the stick. Regards, EJ PRESTON (again, my real name)

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 4:20:41 PM

  (0+)

Read my comments, online, but if you e-mail me at my personal e-mail address, we will have problems, I promise you! You do mot want to meet my husband, and I am beginning to consider this harassment. I am a KINKY volunteer, so you don't know who you are talking to! I did the 24 hour registration drive at Katz's, funny I didn't see you there! I am a Deputy Registrar for Kinky, and have registered hundreds of voters. Have you? Other than putting a sticker on your car, what have you done for the campaign, except say that you like a Bush lapdog. Do you even know David Armstrong? I seriously doubt it! I rebutted each silly item you brought up about Perry on-line. Go look, as obviously you haven't paid attention, yourself! Sara Scafe Toole

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 4:22:10 PM

  (0+)

Sara, I posted your last email publically because of the hypocritical nature of your claim of "harrassment". So it's okay for you to email me, but not me to email you, huh? A couple of more points before I chalk this one up to pointlessness: - Perry was not "appointed" by Bush. Again, you obviously do not understand the basic nature of the Texas governmental system. Please read into it, perhaps then we can have a more mature and interesting conversation. - Your argument, when challenged with anything resembling intellectual decency, rapidly devolves into personal attacks of sorts: "Who do you know?" This, again, is irrelevant and pointless. We're discussing policy, not whom we know. It's time to think outside the box, Sara. While you seem to have a slice of this task accomplished by seriously considering and voting for an independent candidate, you still seem to be stuck in the mindset that the Left is better than the Right (or the opposite for other folks). Nothing I have written amounts to harrassment, though you have certainly offered a veiled threat in mentioning that I "do not want to meet [your] husband". Again, pointless fodder for a discussion that COULD have been productive. Regards, EJ Preston PS - Bush's decade+ of cocaine and alcohol abuse have rendered the man incapable of proper decisions and even basic thought. If you can REALLY blame an incompetent man such as this, be my guest. The problem with this country (ALL PROBLEMS) is us, We The People. WE have allowed our country to decend into the pre-stages of tryanny, WE have allowed Repubs and Dems to control our mindset, placing us in a tiny little box, WE are to blame for all woe. Until WE stand up together (instead of petty bickering like yourself), we will get no where.

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 4:36:02 PM

  (0+)

You have no right to find my personal e-mail address, and then publicly post my PERSONAL response to you. I am not going to waste time here with you about your personal issues, as I am going downtown to register as many more voters as possible; what are you doing tonight? Just because you have a sticker doesn't make you a volunteer, as I haven't see you at a single event! You already stated that you support Perry, so to me, and other Kinky supporters and volunteers, you may be a lost cause. If you respond to me ONE more time at my personal e-mail address, I will make sure that there are consequences for you, and your lack of ethics concerning one's personal, and private correspondence. Thanks for giving me your complete name, as it will be so much easier to find,and deal with you, if I must. Leave the comments area open for the public, and not your personal vendetta! There's an old saying, "If you don't know what your messing with, don't mess!" I strongly suggest you take that advice! Sara Scafe Toole (My Dad was an original creator of Austin City Limits, so you may recognize the Scafe.)

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:09:19 PM

  (0+)

Sara, I did not find your personal email address. You posted it yourself as a part of registering on this website, allowing other users to reply to your articles as a comment or email, or both. Please do not blame me for your lack of personal security. If you're so worried about privacy, then I would advise not listing your email address when posting to a news and current events site such as OpEdNews.com. Are you truly this short sighted? I posted your email to me because it was a vital part of the conversation. I find it very revealing that you edited two separate emails sent to me, combining them into one, cutting out some material, then posted them to OpEdNews.com not once, but twice... Spelling errors included. Who cares how much time you put in with Kinky? Who cares if your mother worked with Ann Richards? Who cares if your father was an original creator of Austin City Limits? And, especially when discussing matters of policy that have nothing to do with these "facts"? We were discussing policy Sara. If you cannot defend your claims in a mature and intellectual manner, perhaps you shouldn't post to public news sites? Again you offer a veiled threat that has nothing to do with my discussion or comments. The comments area is open to the public, as you have said. I am a member of the public. I do not have a vendetta, but rather was simply trying to engage in an intellectual conversation, something you seem woefully incapable of performing. This claim that I should leave the comment space to others (whom I have no capability of impeding anyhow), and that you're glad you have my full name, so as to "deal with me, if [you] must" is simply childish and pointless. It does, however, make you sound awfully familiar to those you hold the most contempt for: BushCo. and the fascists who have taken over this nation. They are the type to track someone by full name, "dealing with them" if they must. Are you projecting your own totalitarian mindset, Sara? You're probably the type that is "always right"? I have conceeded and agreed to many of your claims and facets of your position, as there are some sensible words amidst the jumble of emotions and irrationality. You, however, provide petty personal attacks and grandstanding of your lineage to accomplish retorts against mine. You cannot even see ONE OUNCE of good in Governor Perry, for instance. This incapability to see both the good and bad in any one thing makes you a closed and intolerant person. EJ Preston PS - I don't live in Austin, cannot make these volunteer efforts you speak of (not that I would want to be in the same public space as yourself). I do however speak my mind, publish articles, and generally spread the Kinky message, as any good citizen of the State can. PPS - I dare you to have a frank discussion with your husband regarding this entire exchange, would love to see what he thought about our online dialogue.

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:35:56 PM

  (0+)

I wrote an editorial about what was said in the DEBATE, and in the DEBATE only. You brought up Ann Richards, legislation, and other issues that were not covered in this DEBATE. The Wind Power Bill that you say has been implemented since the 90's was NOT PART of the DEBATE. Perry only mentioned that he JUST PASSED/ okayed the Bill recently in the DEBATE. You have skewed the entire point of the article. Concerning teacher's wages: even with their raises, if they even occurred, they are still some of the lowest paid educators in the US. Look it up yourself, as you obviously have the time. You can become a deputy registrar anywhere in Texas, so why aren't you one if you care so much about the future of Texas? Of course Governors have limited power, but the fact that our re-districting occurred, without Special Circumstances, as the law clearly states, makes it obvious to citizens that the republicans have chopped up former districts in order to further their own agenda. Why you don't see this is beyond me. Why you would message me personally, and then post my own personal response to you is obvious. You are a Perry supporter, and are attempting to dissuade others from voting with their hearts and minds. Willie Nelson was my father's choice as the first performer of ACL, and his ideas concerning bio-diesel WAS MENTIONED in the DEBATE; therefore, it is a relevent fact. Creating alternative fuels that BENEFIT ALL seems much more vital than Wind Power, as this effects very few of the Texas population. I just returned from registering more voters. Like I said, what do you do in your free time? I WILL STATE THIS AGAIN, SINCE YOU DON'T SEEM TO GET IT. THIS WAS BASED ON THE DEBATE, AND THE DEBATE ONLY, not Texas' political history. Many others agree with my perception of the candidates' statements and responses, as you can see from the other comments posted at www.opednews.com, and at the website I posted for comments like yours. Please do not contact me at my personal e-mail address again, as I do not have the time, nor the patience, to explain to you that I am for the people of Texas, and only wrote about what was said during the DEBATE. Healthcare for minors,crime reduction, education, altenative fuels, and implementing programs for the indigent and the poverty stricken should be our first priority, not strengthening our technological capability, as we are rated as one of the highest in the nation in that regard already. You can look that one up too, while you're at it. It seems clear to me that you are for Mr. Perry, so please do not pretend to be a supporter of Kinky when you only have positive things to say about Perry, and solely state that Kinky is the most interesting of the candidates, and that you have a bumper sticker! The fact that you aren't involved, or volunteering in this election, whatsoever, is reprehensible, since you imply that you are an active member of the Texas community. If you look at my other articles posted here, you'll see that they have credible sources to back up each statement that is presented. I will not be responding to anymore of your comments concerning this issue. You have a right to your opinions, but when you vehemently argue about what candidates CLEARLY stated during the DEBATE, and add items to further your Party's agenda, then that's where I draw the line. Good luck in your future endeavors. Vote with your conscience, if you have one. Sara Scafe Toole

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 2:44:45 AM

  (0+)

Sara, I'm sorry Sara, but if you read what you originally wrote (the article itself), you are the one who brought up Ann Richards, and more than once. She had nothing to do with the debate, so if you are trying to be sincere with this last post, you have failed. Redistricting: Again, Sara, you clearly betray your lack of basic knowledge concerning the system you are so involved with. Redistricting covered Federal Congressional Districts, and had nothing to do with our Texas-based local elections for Governor, Lt. Governor, or the Legislature. This program was instituted and hammered through by DeLay, who can truly be described as an immoral and possibly evil man. You're right, we have a long way to go in implementing higher teacher's salaries. This is not something the Governor can truly accomplish, as our Lt. Governor and Legislature are in charge of items such as how much teachers get paid. So, I wonder why you think any Governor is going to be effective regarding such? I am as much a Perry supporter as I am a Kinky supporter, but again will be voting for Kinky, as I would like to see the legitimacy of independent candidates improved. Is there something wrong with this? I have not attacked you for supporting Kinky, but have in fact supported you. The more we are able to see the good and bad in all candidates, the more we are able to discuss these differences without resorting to petty attacks, the quicker this State, and indeed the country, will get better. Healthcare for minors, crime reduction, education, altenative fuels, and implementing programs for the indigent and the poverty stricken are all Legislative battles that must be fought in the House and Senate. If you want to discuss these issues, we should be talking about Legislative candidates, not the Governor. I do not pretend to support Kinky, and I do not have a Party. I am, as stated, a libertarian-with-a-small-"l". I am absolutely independent in view and would vote first for any candidate who professes fiscal conservatism and social tolerance. I am not blinded by any one ideology. From my first comment on, Sara, you have done nothing but grandstand your lineage and attack me personally. This does not a good political debate make. Heck, who knows... Maybe if Kinky had a team of Registrars who weren't so closed minded and hostile he might be doing better in the polls? I hope you are the exception, and not the rule. It's revealing that you continue to post while repeatedly saying you do not have time for it. How many times have you said this now, only to turn around and post again? I was just looking to bring a bit more light into the topic, to see the good in candidates you seem to think are evil puppets. EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 3:03:07 PM

  (0+)

PS - The Wind Power program DOES benefit ALL Texans. The more we wean ourselves from fossil fuels, the better. In fact, Texas is projected as capable of producing 400% of it's own electricity needs through wind power alone! Pretty amazing really... wouldn't it be swell to shut down all those coal and oil burning facilities? The new funding (from the General Fund) for Wind Power was announced WELL BEFORE the debate, Sara. You might want to take a look at the Press Releases issued from the Governor's office for a fact check. As for electric cars and their affordability/use: NO ONE has electric cars Sara... The electric car DIED a few years ago. WE THE CONSUMERS must stand up, stop using our gasoline based automobiles, and DEMAND electric cars to get them. Once we have them, charging them with Wind Power is essential to continuing to move towards a clean and healthy environment. Would you rather we keep the coal and oil facilites? I doubt it... Again, as stated previously, I am a huge supporter of Kinky's ideas for alternative fuel implementation, something he could accomplish using the General Fund. However, ethanol distribution seems to be happening without the government's intervention and, as stated before, I believe ALL CANDIDATES would fund ethanol production from the General Fund when the time came.

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 3:24:29 PM

  (0+)

PPS - If you care to know, the power of any Texas Governor to appoint individuals is clearly laid out here: click here If you look here, you will understand how Perry was NOT appointed by Bush to become the new Governor: click here Again, please do some research, Sara. Your lack of knowledge concerning the very political system you are so actively involved in is scary... EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 4:40:33 PM

  (0+)

Since you can't even spell receive correctly, I am in serious doubt of any of your claims! Since the re-districting, our state has become republican based, and you are saying that isn't an issue during legislation of these bills, and lack of reform? I sincerely believe that you are delusional about Texas politics. You can keep writing, but I won't write back, as I am attempting to get people involved in this race, instead of wasting time arguing with someone who thinks he knows it all, and obviously doesn't. Go to something positive for our community instead; you have enough free time to slam other's opinions all day, so why don't you use your time positively?

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:23:59 PM

  (0+)

Sara, How does redistricting (which I wholeheartedly disagree with, again agreeing with some parts of your stance) have anything to do with the power of the Governor and his capability to legislate in Texas? What bills were we discussing? We were discussing who would be an ideal Governor. I'd like to see Kinky do well, or even win, because this would shatter the left-right paradigm. However, I also recognize that, when discussing those matters that he can/cannot affect, Governor Perry has done quite a few good things. You're avoiding the discussion with other issues or personal attacks. I wouldn't hold my breath very long on a political writing career. EJ Preston PS - might want to do a little spellchecking yourself, Sara.

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:51:54 PM

  (0+)

Slimey? Oh yeah, that's the word I'd use for Rick (get them fags out of Texas) Perry. I don't like him and I have never liked him. In my opinion, he has been incredibly ineffectual in governing this state. He's not kidding anyone with his crap about schools. Texas schools suck, period. They are grossly underfunded. The teachers are grossly overworked and underpaid. The TAKS test is a waste of time, effort, and proves nothing other than the abilty to memorize. It doesn't prove the ability for abstract independent thought. Texas has the highest drop out rate as well. There's something wrong with education in this state, and Perry is NOT the answer. Granny Fanny Nestlerod only gave me the creeps. I'm sorry but she seems to be way too shifty and smarmy to even rate slight consideration. She tried to paint herself as a political outsider, yet she has held numerous offices, and apparently has screwed them up. She's so far off my list, it's like she doesn't exist to me. Bell, well, I have to say, he did impress me. He knew his sh*t, and that's not a bad thing. Unfortunately, he impressed me also as not being very dynamic. I just don't think that Texas is the kind of state for him to govern. I could see him governing Ohio, Wyoming, or some other low key state. Texas needs someone with zing, zest, and a certain kind of shoot from the hip style. Anything less just wouldn't be right. Which brings me to my man, Kinky Friedman. I like him. I have liked him since I first heard about him from my roommate. I love his style. I love his honesty. I love his straight talk. I love his definition of politics. And I agree with it as well. I see many in government as nothing more than parasites who couldn't attain or maintain any other career path besides politics. He is obviously a smart man, having written books and songs. He's nobody's fool. Which is why I think he probably won't win. As much as I hate to say it, people in this state, and in the rest of America don't like anyone who shoots straight and calls 'em as he sees 'em. They prefer someone who coddles them in an unending blanket of comfy lies and soft cushy bullshit. They don't want their comfort level disturbed to any degree whatsoever. That's a shame. The last thing we need is another politician who blows hot air, yet can't do anything else. However, that's probably just what we are going to get. Be that as it may, I flatly refuse to vote for anyone but Kinky. I can't and won't. I truly believe that if he gets into the governor's mansion, things will really turn around in Texas. His ideas on renewable energy make real sense. His plan to decriminalize pot is, to me, and idea that should have been accepted at the federal level years ago. His ideas on throwing out the TAKS tests, and improving schools are absolute musts! His honesty is something that is so needed in politics, it would be a shame if we voted anyone else into the governor's mansion besides him. I think it's a total travesty that he is the focus of a smear campaign. What's worse is the false moral outrage that I hear so many yelling in his direction over his supposed racist statements. I hate to burst the bubbles of the high-minded nose in the air crowd in the Lone Star State, but I have never known so many racists in my entire life as I know here in Texas. To me, any Texan calling any other Texan a racist is a case of pots condemning the color of kettles. This state is overflowing with racists. So what's the problem? Am I saying I believe racism is right? No. However, let's face facts as they are. Right or wrong, this state reeks to high heaven with racists. Let's face even a more bitter truth, everyone is racist. What is our condemnation of persons of Middle Eastern descent but racism? What is anti-semitism, something I am sure Kinky has dealt with, but racism? It's everywhere, and everyone does it. Therefore to condemn someone as a racist is to condemn ones self in the same breath. All of this is beside the fact that he is being called racist because of song lyrics taken out of context. That is such bullshit. Has Eric Clapton been arrested because he sang the Bob Marley song, I Shot The Sherrif? No. Is Gene Simmons of Kiss under arrest because he sang a love song to Christine, Sixteen? No. Come on, here. Yet Kinky is being crucified by racists because of racist lyrics in a song taken completely out of context. I wish people would wise up and know when their foot is being pissed on and the pisser is blaming it on a warm summer rain. In conclusion, I will vote for Kinky, and I think that every Texan that is tired of the status quo should do the same. Keeping Perry only means more of the same. Granny Fanny is just to smarmy for words. Bell, although smart as a whip just doesn't have the pennache...he'd be my choice if it weren't for Kinky, I will give him that much. Vote Kinky! Piss off both the Democrats and the Republicans at one time. How often do we get a chance to do that? Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 5:16:55 AM

  (0+)

One more thing. Take this for what it's worth. Why would Kinky be the only one candidate for governor that's feeling the heat of a smear campaign? Probably because he's the one who scares the sh*t out of Perry more than the others. Perry knows that Kinky has the best chance to take over Austin. Why else would Kinky be the only one on the receiving end of a smear campaign? Kinky's the focus because he's right, and Perry knows it. None of the others are even on the radar of the Republican smear machine. That should have some sort of meaning. Please, don't let those Republicans have their way with a good and honest man. It's not right. Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 5:24:11 AM

  (0+)

Pappy, The power of the Governor of Texas is SERIOUSLY limited, more so than just about any other state. Our system of Executive government is NOT like the Federal System. Our Lt. Governor has most of the power, especially legislative, in Texas. The Governor is a figurehead of sorts, and his only real power is that of appointment here and there, as well as use of the General Fund (which Perry has been very effective with). Check out what the General Fund has been used for over the last few years. Some pretty amazing stuff really. EJ Preston PS - for Sara and Pappy: The wind power program begun under Bush and continued under Perry has been a wild success, making leaps and bounds since back in '98. Sara, this is not just an announcement for voters. Again, you betray your lack of basic knowledge concerning our state. The wind power program IMMEDIATELY came to fruition when it was begun, and has grown exponentially since then, making Texas a WORLD LEADER in wind power technology research AND implementation.

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 4:46:39 PM

  (0+)

Does Wind Energy run vehicles? I think not. It does chop birds up; something I consider destructive. We need to focus on our fuel innovations for all people, not only to those in the technological fields. Ethanol does this brilliantly; take Brazil, for example. They grow sugarcane, and use it for fuel, as an ethanol base. They do not have to rely on other countries' oil production, as a high percentage of vehicle fuel is from their own country.

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:16:54 PM

  (0+)

Sara, We're posting at the same rate here. According to your definition, we both evidently have too much time on our hands. Again, to place the following in context, we were discussing the capabilities and programs of Governors. Wind Energy can in fact run automobiles (or rather charge them), provided they are electric cars. Unfortunately, the Governor's job description does not include this innovation. Wind towers chopped up birds in the 70s, Sara. Have you ever been out to West Texas and seen the thousands of massive turbines? They rotate VERY SLOWLY. In fact, funny enough, some bird endangered bird species are NESTING on top of the turbine bases. How does where we get our oil from have anything to do with whom become Governor? The free market and major auto manufacturers are responsible for the electric car's innovation and implementation, and WE the consumers are not going to get it until we all stand up and demand it. Goverment is not a solution to this problem, like any other, we are. Goverments simply create problems, at the end of the day. EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:58:41 PM

  (0+)

Let's see; how many electric cars are on the road? Very few, and the average Texan cannot afford them. Once again, you are wasting my time. You may think that you know it all because you obviously have hunted for all this information on-line that you keep spewing. I only went on the candidates' statements for this editorial; something that you still don't seem to get. My editorial was based solely on the debate. Research wasn't an issue for this topic, as it was seen by scores of Texas citizens, but you still keep researching topics. What is your true agenda? Never mind, I don't really care. SST

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 3:00:35 AM

  (0+)

Sara, How can any one voter make an informed and proper vote WITHOUT research? I draw information from years of searching and learning, both on and offline. This last post of yours clearly shows how little you care about facts, how much ideology and "party politics" paly into your decisions as to whom to vote for. My agenda is a clear and rational debate, again, something you seem incapable of. A proper editorial by yourself would have included research as to whether or not the candidates were telling the truth, in addition to how effective any one candidate would be as Governor. EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 3:07:02 PM

  (0+)

PS - Opps, I mean to say, some endangered bird species are nesting on the towers. And regarding enthanol. I certainly agree! It's a wonderful alternative to oil-based gasoline, and one that will benefit farmers at the same time! Kinky's program to fund ethanol production and implementation in Texas MAY not even be needed. Haven't you heard, Sara? Take a look: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1641733/posts http://www.heb.com/aboutHEB/media-PR-E85Killeen.jsp click here As you can see, HEB is rolling out a statewide Ethanol distribution system. Keep in mind that HEB is a MAJOR competitor of the other major brand gas stations. Why is this happening without legislation do you say? Why, many truck consumers, and even the Government's fleet of automobiles, are using enthanol and bio-diesel. Again, if Kinky were to be elected, he would push this system into overdrive. Then again, when the tipping point came along, it's likely that every one of the candidates would do such, even Perry. Heck, if he IS Bush's lapdog as you say, then he must take the President's outlook on biofuels seriously too, huh? EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 9:03:10 PM

  (0+)

First of all, I mentioned NOTHING about the power, supposed, real, or otherwise of the governor. I only wrote of my impressions of the debate. Since we had other events to attend at the time, I set up our DVD recorder and recorded the entirety of the debates. Therefore, I can watch it again and again (and probably will tonight when my roomie gets home). I wrote of my impressions of all the candidates. Let me re-iterate since you obviously missed that point. Rick (get them fags out of Texas) Perry is a greasy, slimy f*ck. His administration has done nothing to help anyone in this state except special interest dogs with more money than sense, much like Perry himself. Granny Fanny Strayhorn gives me the creeps. I find her to be disengenuous to the core. I wouldn't vote for her if someone were holding a gun to my head and forcing me to mark an "X" on her name. Anyone who casts themselves as a political outsider, yet has held more than one political office is a liar. Obviously, she is a liar, and therefore the last person I feel is qualified to take up residence in Austin. The last one behind Perry, that is. Bell was without a doubt the most clearly spoken and intellectually prepared of the lot. If I were to choose someone other than Kinky, Bell would be that one. It will take brains to fix the problems in Texas, and it's clear to me from the few minutes he had to speak that Chris Bell has brains. The only reason I remain in Kinky's camp is simply because I got the impression that Mr. Bell lacks the fire and spiciness of personality that is also indespensible for governing a state such as Texas. I may be wrong in this assessment, but I can ONLY go on what I saw. As to your comment, PS - for Sara and Pappy: The wind power program begun under Bush and continued under Perry has been a wild success, making leaps and bounds since back in '98. Sara, this is not just an announcement for voters. Again, you betray your lack of basic knowledge concerning our state. The wind power program IMMEDIATELY came to fruition when it was begun, and has grown exponentially since then, making Texas a WORLD LEADER in wind power technology research AND implementation, I CHALLENGE you to tell me where I mentioned ANYTHING about the governor's power in my comments. Come on, I'll give you ten minutes to re-read my comments. Time's up! How dare you try to lump my commentary in with the commentary offered by someone else! Just because I may seem like a convenient target given my on-going war of words with vulturetx and Sbaker does not give you the right to dare to besmirch my understanding of the office of governor in the state of Texas, or to put words into my mouth. Who the f*ck died and named you the final arbiter of what I may or may not know about the powers of the governor of the state of Texas? No one! Beyond that, what gives you the right to say anything about my understanding on any topic? Who are you to say I don't know what I am talking about, ESPECIALLY given that I mentioned not one f*cking word about the powers of the governor. Frankly, I don't give a sh*t. To me, that is a beside the point issue in relation to the topic at hand; what I said about my impression of the debates. Therefore, I would request that you or others who are looking for a reason to slam me for my opinion would at least do me the polite honor of READING my words before you set to task of making me appear as willfully ignorant of reality as some of the others who post commentary (and nothing else). It's not like I don't offer many reasons to be slapped down for my understanding or opinion. Don't go around trying to put words into my mouth! If you can't directly slam me for what I said, don't allow the fictional writer in your head to spin a novella about words I haven't even written. Oh, and one more thing, I don't really care who is or isn't the biggest Kinky loyalist here. I don't care how many envelopes have been stuffed by whom, who has more Kinky bumper stickers than whom, or who didn't see whom at fundraisers. To me, all that crap harkens back to a Dr. Seuss story about the rabbit bragging on his ears and the bear bragging on his nose. In the words of the worm that stopped it all, "...and the fools that I saw were none other than you who seem to have nothing better to do than sit here and argue who's better than who!" Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 12:29:23 PM

  (0+)

Pappy, I must apologize. I did not post the item concerning Wind Power, etc in it's proper place on the comment tree. However, the powers of the Governor are very important when considering which candidate one should vote for. One must distrust any Texas Governor candidate who promises leglislative changes and agendas, as this is beyond their reach. This knowledge should be shared by all Texas voters, as it is vital in understanding our system and who should be Governor, informing a good vote. As for vulturetx and Sbaker, I have no idea who they are or what you've been saying to one another. Again, I'm sorry you got mixed up in Sara and I's "debate". Please, though, can you not make a point without resorting to vulgarity? EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 3:14:04 PM

  (0+)

Firstly, I accept your apology. I understand that in a debate such as the one that seems to grow exponentially here when I go off to eat dinner then sing (horribly) at a local karaoke bar, sometimes things get said that weren't intended. Secondly, whether or not I hold a true reckoning of the powers of the governor of this state is unimportant. The point remains the position wouldn't exist if it was purely a figurehead position. My understanding, or lack thereof of the power of the governor in no way changes my opinion on whom I think is best qualified to hold the position. It should not be used as a means of disqualifying my opinion on the issue. Thank the goddess I care enough to register to vote (like as soon as I moved to Texas), and watch the debates with a clear and open mind. Yes, if someone had said something I felt strongly about, I might have changed my opinion on Kinky. That didn't happen. Bell came close, but once again, his lack of personal charisma puts him in a close second to Mr. Friedman. Thirdly, I write what's on my mind. I was grossly offended by your statements, and I figured there was no better way to prove it than to let rip with the "F" bomb. I assume that I communicated my displeasure rather clearly. I do not edit expletives in my speaking, and I am surely not going to do it in my writing. We are all adults here, and frankly, even if we weren't, you show me one kid who has never heard or said "fuck", and I'll show you a kid that's been kept in a closet all his or her life. While I freely admit there are times and places where certain words should not be used, I also say that if I am willing to accept the responsibility for exercising my freedom of speech and expression, then I am, by virtue of the Constitution of the United States of America, allowed to say whatever I wish whenever I deem it necessary to be said. That's not to say I won't exercise decorum where I feel it's in my best interest to do so. In the case of my posting, Be that as it may..., I felt my use of the "F" bomb was both appropriate, and well within the limits of the anger I felt at the time. I will endeavor in the future to be a bit more cautious about its use, but I make no guarantees that I won't drop it again. Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 3:08:19 AM

  (0+)

Pappy, HaHa! You're a good man, I like your position and how you defend it. "Figurehead" is certainly too light of a term for the power of the Governor, but isn't too far from the truth. As far as Legislation goes, the Gov vetos or approves, and that's about it. He can call Special or Emergency Sessions of the Leg too, but with no guarantee that the House and Senate will actually work on the proposed topic(s). What the Governor can do, with great success no matter whom they are, is act as the Business Developer of Texas. This is where the General Fund comes into play. The Governor can toss large amounts of cash at various projects, whether civic (like highways or mass-transit) or business related (like getting Toyota to build a plant in San Antonio, or Lockheed's operation in Ft. Worth). Essentially, the Governor can create JOBS in Texas, which I feel is the most pressing concern any group of people should have on the state of their region. Jobs = economic security. Economic security = freedom. No amount of civil rights legislation (for instance) can match up to what a good job provides a citizen (no matter what race or gender). I CAN imagine that the Governor could use the General Fund to advocate legislation. Perhaps Kinky, for instance, could mount a massive public affairs campaign over the airwaves and so forth that would push for marijuana decriminalization (for instance). I'm not sure how the Leg would react though. I'd think they would try to pass legislation, if they haven't already, saying the Gov cannot use the General Fund for policy advocacy. Again, I'm sorry you were so grossly offended. That said, it IS important to understand how the Office of the Governor operates when considering candidates. I was merely seeking to share this knowledge as a general concept, rather than disqualifying any view as to whom should actually be the Gov. I continue to see Kinky as the most interesting and best choice overall (mostly because he does not belong to any one Party). I doubt that he'll use the General Fund in any wholey different manner than Perry (or anyone else) has and, as stated in other posts, I very much agree with his policies. He'll have to mount one hell-uv-a public campaign (once Governor) to get any of those policy ideas implemented though. Regards, EJ Preston

by EJ Preston (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 18 comments) on Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:59:25 AM

  (0+)

Pappy, HaHa! You're a good man, I like your position and how you defend it. Thanks. I consider myself to be pretty reasonable. However, I do have my dark side, and try as I might, sometimes it comes out when I'd prefer it stay down inside, where it belongs. I truly hope that no one takes me as an expert on anything here. When I write, I write from my gut. The only things I consider myself expert on is electronic engineering technology, repairing Rosco fog machines, and rebuilding automobile engines. I like to think myself an astute observer of society, but even at that, I am no expert, and have been proved wrong on more occasions than I care to admit. That's why I am going with Kinky. First, last, and always, my gut has told me he's the right man for the job. He's honest, sincere, and to my way of thinking, the most humanist of the candidates. Besides that, given a choice, I will always go with the independent candidate. While that didn't hold true with Nader in 2000, I have never been much of a Nader fan, at least as far as supporting him for political office. He's done many wonderful things for society. Everyone who gets in a car crash and survives it owes a debt of gratitude to him. However, I think he is better as a political outsider. That gives him his unique perspective. Somehow, I think for him to get elected to an office would take that away. I would hate to see that happen. Here's hoping for a Kinky win! I know at least three people who are voting for him: me, my roommate, and my roommate's lover. True, we are all under one roof, but even if we lived apart, I'd know three confirmed Kinky votes. GO KINKY! Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Oct 12, 2006 at 3:53:05 AM

  (0+)

Kinky has some wonderful ideas for Texas that didn't get in the debate, as he was being slammed so often that he never had the opportunity to address these issues. He is NOT a racist; he picketed Austin restaurants in the early sixties until they desegregated. The others must be terribly afraid of him, as was obvious in their attempt to humiliate him. Perry must be awfully nervous about the situation, and I don't blame him one bit! Go to: www.kinkyfriedman.com to contribute, so that Kinky can get his message out. Thanks so much! Sara Scafe Toole

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 3:09:19 AM

  (0+)

As I said in my comment above, A forgotten point!, the only reason Kinky is the single focus of a smear campaign by the Republican spin machine is because he scares Perry shitless. Perry knows that Kinky Friedman is the single greatest threat to his retaining the office of governor in Texas. Notice they aren't slamming Strayhorn, although goddess knows, I'm sure they wouldn't have to make things up to slap her into next week. They aren't slamming Chris Bell because Perry simply doesn't see him as a real threat. No, the only one on the receiving end of a smear campaign is Kinky. This fact more than any other has cemented my choice for governor. I am always for the underdog, or the one who is being unfairly and unjustly accused of things he hasn't done. I won't say I don't think Kinky is a racist since not one person who breathes can claim moral purity on that point, not even myself. I will say that given a choice between a greasy, slimy Republican, a creepy, obvious liar that changes political parties like some change their underwear, an intelligent man who lacks personal flair, and a supposed racist who speaks the thoughts I hold on so many issues, I'll pick the supposed racist any day, any way. I think it's a travesty that not more people are working to slam back against Perry and the spin machine which he is using against Kinky. Perhaps instead of wasting time arguing about who is better than who, those who say they are part of Kinky's camp should be trying to stop the spin. That's just my opinion! Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 12:47:37 PM

  (0+)

I personally love Kinky and am an active volunteer in his campaign. What really bothered me was that the panel, and other candidates focused in terminology that he used decades ago. Kinky picketed Austin restaurants in the early sixties that were segregated until they became desegregated; he is no rascist! What we need in the Kinky campaign is MONEY in order to put ads on TV, so Kinky can get through to the voters! Please go to: www.kinkyfriedman.com for his true agenda, and how you can help! I AM VOTING FOR KINKY BECAUSE I BELIEVE IN HIM!!!

by SARA SCAFE TOOLE (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 3:06:46 PM

  (0+)

Thanks for your comments. I watched the debate also. I wanted to go into the TV after Perry. You are right on people who vote for Kinky have got to vote for Bell. -- What has conviently been for gotten the Strayhorn has said in the past there needs to be MORE toll roads -- so why is she so set against this one-- I think it is just becasue that would be more popular to be against it-- once in -- she just says-- nothing I could do about it....

by Sandy Wittliff (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Sunday, Oct 8, 2006 at 7:38:57 PM

  (0+)

As I said, I don't like her at all. I thought it almost impossible that I would find anyone more distasteful to me than Perry, but I was wrong. She honestly gave me the creeps. All she kept doing was hawking her so-called plan, and trying to paint herself as a political outsider. To me, her plan sounds an awful lot like talking points the Republicans find so endearing. Also, I cannot fathom how someone who has held more than one public office, especially one held in the capital, Austin, can call herself a political outsider. Kinky Friedman is a political outsider. *I* am a political outsider. My cat, Ashley, is a political outsider, and sometimes a real pain in the ass. I'd sooner vote for the gay bashing homophobe Perry than I would vote for "one tough grandma". I'd sooner cover myself in sugar water and lay down on a fire ant nest than vote for Strayhorn. I'd sooner.....oh, you get the point. GRIN Blessed be! Pappy

by Pappy (61 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 860 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 3:19:02 AM

  (0+)