![]() |
|
|
September 12, 2007 at 11:09:00
Judge says false dynamite testimony by police "immaterial" in Omaha Black Panther case by Michael Richardson Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
Douglas County District Judge Russell Bowie has denied Black Panther leader Ed Poindexter a new trial for the 1970 bombing murder of an Omaha police officer. Judge Bowie had spent the summer reviewing the transcript of the 1971 trial which convicted Poindexter and Mondo we Langa, formerly David Rice, of first-degree murder and resulted in life sentences for the two men. Poindexter's bid for a new trial was based largely on voice analysis of a tape of the emergency call that lured police to a vacant house where a booby-trapped suitcase bomb awaited them and conflicting testimony about dynamite purportedly found at Langa's home. The Nebraska chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union had filed an amicus brief in the case informing the court about the Federal Bureau of Investigation's discredited COINTELPRO operation that targeted the Black Panthers for dirty tricks and harassment. Although Bowie allowed the ACLU brief into the record he did not address the concerns raised about improper conduct by FBI agents working on the case. Poindexter and Langa were implicated in the crime by the confessed bomber, Duane Peak, after giving multiple conflicting statements. Following his testimony that the two Panther leaders were involved Peak was prosecuted as a juvenile and only served several years in juvenile detention facilities while Poindexter and Langa, who continue to proclaim their innocence, received life sentences.
The critical evidence against the Panthers was Peak's testimony and dynamite allegedly found in Langa's basement. At the murder trial, Omaha detective Jack Swanson testified he found dynamite in a coal bin in the basement of Langa's house and was backed up by detective Robert Pheffer who testified he first saw the dynamite when Swanson carried it up the stairs. However, crime scene evidence technicians took photos of the basement but no dynamite is present in the photos. The explosives first appear in an evidence photo in the trunk of a police cruiser and were never photographed in the house.
In 1974, during Langa's federal appeal in a hearing before U.S. District Judge Warren Urbom the police story changed. Then both Swanson and Pheffer claimed to have seen dynamite in the basement but against the furnace instead of in the coal bin.
In May of this year, in an evidentiary hearing before Judge Bowie, Pheffer changed his story yet again. This time he testified he found the dynamite in the basement, not Swanson, contradicting his own trial testimony. He also alleged he found more bomb-making supplies in the house that were never previously introduced and are not on the police search inventory of Langa's house.
Rather than dismiss the conflicting police testimony or attempt to determine which version might be truthful, Bowie sidestepped the crucial dynamite issue and declared, "Other than the conflicting reports about who found the dynamite in Rice's basement, there is no evidence to suggest that dynamite was planted by police. The bottom line is that dynamite was found in Rice's basement, who found it is immaterial."
The other critical element in the case against Poindexter and Langa was the testimony of Peak. Besides confessing to planting the bomb, Peak also testified at trial that he placed the emergency call that lured police officer Larry Minard to his death. However, the dictabelt recording of the emergency call was never put into evidence and turned up missing. Years later, following a Freedom of Information request, a COINTELPRO memo to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover surfaced that explained the police did not want use of the tape because it harmed their case.
In 1980, a reel-to-reel copy of the original recording was found. Last year the tape copy was subjected to voice analysis and expert witness Tom Owen scrutinized the recording using new technology unavailable in 1970 when the tape was first made. Owen testified to Judge Bowie that in his opinion the voice on the tape was not that of Duane Peak.
Poindexter's attorney, Robert Bartle, argued that if Peak's credibility about placing the emergency call cannot be trusted then his implication of Poindexter and Langa also cannot be trusted--particularly in light of his reduced sentence.
Judge Bowie sidestepped the testimony of Owen and avoided making a ruling on the credibility of Peak. Bowie admitted the copy of the tape was genuine but decided that it was insufficient to undermine the conviction.
"Mr. Poindexter has not shown that Mr. Owen's opinion would most likely produce an acquittal in a new trial. This is not a case where the guilt or innocence of the defendant hinges on whether a jury believed that Mr. Peak made the 911 call. That is but one part of the evidence against the defendant."
With key elements of the case now in question, Peak's testimony and the dynamite, Poindexter's next legal step will be an appeal to the Nebraska Supreme Court. Interviewed in prison two days before Judge Bowie's ruling, co-defendant Mondo we Langa said it would be a "good thing" to get a new trial but that the 37 long years behind bars gave him "low expectations" about a favorable ruling in a Nebraska courtroom.
Permission granted to reprint
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
| 3 comments |
|
james
This comment has been flaggedReason: (Great Comment: Promote to Article) Great Comment: Promote to Article Comment from Ratings: Thought the courts corrupt in Chicago, or Mississippi? Nebraska's Douglas County 4th District court in Omaha may be the single most corrupt court system in the United states, and that's saying something! in a courthouse where one of America's nastiest public lynchings happened( they say that the the judges here are proud of the history and compete for the actual courtroom where the lynching happened) injustice reigns supreme--where Judges are openly Freemasons(a pass on the law to fellow members of the secret handshake) and one county judge who never went to college, all of the Judges in the district are right-wing and mostly from the same local law school, and belong to the same political machine and country club. Is it any wonder that the Franklin Scandal happened here? Or the Cointelpro Rice-Poindexter case? Or the Hitchcock Foundation case, where the same Judge Russell Bowie who ruled that Rice and Poindexter could not have a new trial was involved as a defendant in the hostile takeover of Nebraska's oldest foundation by white collar crooks involved in Enron dealings in Omaha, and the nebraska Supreme Court allowed him to continue sitting as a judge!!(See Hitchcock Foundation articles in Counterpunch). Bowie is a judge like Roy Cohn was a lawyer, walking the same sleazy streets, but in quiet Omaha no one bats an eye at injustice. by zandor vorkov (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Sunday, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:04:42 AM
|
|
Judicial Stage props
The entire episode of the frame up of the Black Panthers has all the appearances of basic "Intelligence operation." First the "Intel operators" plant a bomb, then they have some simple person make a report that will bring the local Police to the scene. Next they detonate the bomb and kill a cop, and the end result is the destruction of the Black Panther movement. Case closed, except, years later "They-the Intel ops gang,-" send "Their" people to direct the current judge to keep the lies alive. The entire court system of America is today a complete and total tool of an alien and foreign terrorist power, based within the Bank of England. When the "Living Dead," finally get a clue, the Judiciary along with all of the terrorist tools of our soon to be departing "Master Class" will be "Booked" into the historical record as the enemy and alien structure and stage prop it really is. by Patrick (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 519 comments [22 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:30:11 AM
|
|
Judge
I wish the only commenter hadn't ruined his take on the subject with "based on the Bank of England" which of course is unadulterated nonsense. We don't have to look beyond our own legal system to find corruption. by Archie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1757 comments [112 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:53:03 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |