Tags for This Article:

Money (2043)  Money (2043)  Money (1123)  Reagan (58)  Christian (37)  Christian (36)  Barry (3) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 14, 2007 at 20:18:26

Phyllis Schlafly - Exposed: Part 2 on the NeoCons

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Now, our subject for today: Phyllis Schlafly and her well paid work over the last 40 years. Her career was founded on, “A Choice, Not an Echo.” The book, well written and researched, itself turned out to be the persuader that focused attention on Schlafly's potential to feed a disinformation campaign that has gone on for decades.

BigOil found Phyllis hanging around the John Birch Society in the mid 60s. Schlafly was ambitious, looking at a cultural reality that denied to women the opportunities available to men in professions. The Glass Ceiling was still intact. Someone, doubtless made her a lucrative offer, perhaps even William F. Buckley, Jr. They needed a mouth to inject disinformation, persuading women they wanted to stay second class citizens.” Phyllis grabbed the job with both hands.

Her alternatives were bleak. Ads for jobs in the paper were still listed in two categories, “MEN,” and “WOMEN.” Intelligent women who had worked to earn graduate degrees were routinely offered jobs as typists.

It was understandable; her background was not strong on any familial work in social justice; her family had never contributed to any of the movements that created the wealth of America in social consciousness.

Intelligent, driven, and entirely focused on doing the job for which she had been hired, Phyllis blossomed.

The biography written by Donald T. Critchlow, titled, “Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism,” was reviewed favorably by the Horowitz organ, Front Lines Magazine, October 12, 2005. That interview by Critchlow holds some interesting insights into Schlafly and events along with crediting Schlafly with phenomenal success in subverting the agenda for women's rights.

Critchlow: It is certain that ERA would have been ratified. It defeating ERA, Schlafly tapped into a new constituency that GOP conservative strategists realized could revive the party: Christian evangelicals. This was a constituency waiting to be mobilized. Traditional minded Christians, as well as Jews, felt that they were under attack by the secular left. Since the banning of prayer in public schools in 1962, evangelical Christians had been simmering. Then in the late 1960s came further assaults on tradition and custom through the liberalization of abortion on the state level, feminism, sex education, and the spread of pornography. Schlafly mobilized evangelical Christian women into the STOP ERA campaign, and in doing so, helped revive the conservative movement and the GOP, shifting it to the Right. She showed that social issues was the key to unleash a conservative revolution that began in the midterm elections of 1978 and continued through the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980.”

BigOil had gone after the Conservative Movement using William F. Buckley, Jr., Ronald Reagan, and employing the wiles of Bush Senior and his paid political operative, Karl Rove. They had subsidized the work of Ralph Reed and Pat Robertson in remaking the demographics of the GOP. Hiring Phyllis a natural continuation of the same strategy. The first goal was extinguishing the real agenda of Conservatism as enunciated by Robert Taft and Barry Goldwater while continuing to shake the boogie man of Communism.

It worked. But looking back we can see that it was always a ruse.

The analysis of United Republicans of California, the group who had gotten Reagan the governorship of California in 1968, Ronald Reagan was never a Conservative. His administration had laid the groundwork for a shift to centralized control that was unprecedented in California history. Changes included state control of education, promotion of regional government, institution of sex eduction in schools, guidelines for redress of racial imbalance in schools, a sharp decrease in personal property rights, Income Tax Withholding, a move towards gun control, and other acts that caused the group to “oppose Ronald Reagan' as candidate for President or Vice President, and urge Americans Nationwide to carefully scrutinize his record.”

An educated woman who had known Barry Goldwater and was well informed, Phyllis Schlafly would have had to be well aware of the disconnect between two philosophies that were diametrically opposed. Schlafly consistently ignored the ideas of Conservatism, selling the repackaged ideas of the newly rising wave of Evangelicals from Southern denominations then being urged to become political and active in the Republican Party. This wave of membership was very different than the activists who had supported Goldwater.

The Republican Party shifted not to the Right, the traditional direction of individual rights, small government, and low taxes, but to burgeoning Federalism that used government as the accepted means for coercing personal behavior. Phyllis helped create that shift; she profited and gloried in her success.

When an intelligent, articulate woman undertakes a clear agenda that in no way conforms to her stated goals it is well to take the irrefutable actions as leading straight to the truth of the matter.

Schlafly herself came from a home where her mother, Odile Dodge, the daughter of the moderately successful attorney, worked as a librarian and a school teacher to support her own family and that of her parents. Schlafly herself was forced, due to the family's financial straits, to begin working early to put herself through college.

Why would Schlafly work to deny to other women the opportunities she took for herself?

The obvious is that this strategy made possible a prominence and prosperity that otherwise would have been impossible. Schlafly was motived by a fierce desire for money and social prominence that also propelled her into the Daughter's of the American Revolution.

 1  |  2

 

http://howtheneoconsstolefreedom.blogspot.com

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather.

Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Libertarian Party in 1988 when she returned to the Republican Party and became active in the National Federation of Republican Women.

She is also the the founder of the the Arthur C. Pillsbury Foundation

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments

57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Wrong target

I have deep suspicion of most things ‘ism’ as at best they are usually philosophically dubious, myopically reasoned and often based on prejudices. Sexism, feminism are two just so examples.I am in no way claiming that in the context you use them that an apparent bias is evident. What I take issue with is the validity of the diagnosis.

Let’s say you had a field of wheat when one morning the field was completely trashed at to one side you see two horses. Do you then assume that you’ve had a plague of horses and medicate accordingly?

I have never read a convincing argument that gender is the root cause of glass ceilings etc. It makes no sense to treat ear canker in a sow and then expect to make a silk purse. Consider for a moment for every woman who is nominally capable and wants the top jobs there are several times that men who have been likewise excluded.

I would suggest that the exclusion of women from top jobs is more to do with either or both the nature of the civilization and protecting power. Board rooms are often a collection of old mates who think alike and have similar largely symbiotic attitudes.Fred may nominate Tom for the board of XXX   tom will inturn nominate Fred for the board on YYY. In this way they protect their personal power. 

 A woman a Gay male may or someone with more ability constitutes a threat. Experience shows that this attitude of self interest and fear of differences is practiced by women too…it is a human trait not necessarily a gender one.

e.g. the Chair of Hardie Industries (Aust)  was a woman. When the company was found liable for billions because they knowing made and manufactured Asbestos sheeting she arranged for the company to relocate off shore winding up the company with the liabilities. Additionally it is alleged that Hardies deliberately under funded the entity to pay the compensation. Holding out until they could get tax credits for their payments. During all this she awarded herself a 200% pay rise. She’s due for court soon.

Then there’s the Qantas director who recommended an equity buy out only for it to come to light after it failed that she was a prime beneficiary.

On a more mundane level there’s the young woman who was miffed at being passed over for a promotion even though he was more suitable. She then initiated a sexual harassment claim against his saying he exposed himself to her and asked for sex. After being denied she went above my head to my boss where she was informed that the man in question had left those parts of his body in a paddy field in SE Asia… She replied that she didn’t believe us we were covering for him because he had children. They were in fact his wife’s she had been a war widow. In the end the Govt department acting for The young woman suggested we  move her  to another division to avoid embarrassment for the man. They had seen the medical report by then.

She was moved three months later she left with a customer listing offering it for sale if she got a job. As it would happen the hiring boss at the opposition was in the same squad at  the same time as our unfortunate victim had been injured.

He returned the listing and blackballed her in the industry. Last I saw she was being “door stopped” on a TV expose for selling dodgy houses. Was that a male thing? I don’t think so it could have been me if I had victimized the man in question.

Back to my Canker and silk purse analogy.  Any civilization that is based on the worst of human traits then one shouldn’t be surprised if it has many illnesses. Our civilization is not only built on our least admirable characteristics but it seems to luxuriate in some of them. We mindlessly encourage wealth, power and success while ignoring what the individual has done to get them. It should come as a surprise that this results in pathological and immoral actions to protect them. 

 The laws have been perverted to the point of obscenity in some areas like corporate law, and responsibility even at times in criminal law. A poor person goes down on dubious or minimal facts but a rich person gets away with goodness knows.  

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 2:59:17 AM
 


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather. Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Liber...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterMelinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather. Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Liber...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Yack, yack

Draw the time line. Schlafly wrote a best seller on the fact that corporations were controlling America in 1962. From the late 1960s until today she has been attacking everything but the corporations. They pay regularly, so that is understandable on a crude level.

She did not have amnesia; she sold out to the highest bidder.

Her motivation? Money and prestige she would never have had otherwise.

She did not want to have to earn it on the playing field then available to women. Natural, not not forgivable. Either you play the cards dealt you or compromise; you do not chop up other people for profit, at least decent people do not.

She had a rich husband she should have simply smiled and said, "Yes Fred."

By the way, I am prolife (worked the right to life line), and a Republican and worked for Goldwater. I give slap down to my own because decent people clean up their own house first. The GOP will not be clean until scum like her are gone.

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster (139 articles, 1 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 121 comments) on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 3:13:45 AM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

She did bad things ok

She  did bad things okay, no argument but you missed my point it's the "ism"  an the inherant illogicality that bothers me.

Descrimination is descrimination  and an unacceptable action. I was saying  that  we have a bad basis for a civilization one that encourages these sorts of behaviour therefore the changes needed are more fundemental.  Ask yourself  if we had a day for spitting on her grave or front door would that change the situation?.  

 I argued that to fix the crime you need to understand the source (cause) of the infection. Merely attacking males  and male 'alleged" conspiracies  as the proforma for this woman's misbegotten stance  is misplaced.  The problem is she was a person doing bad things because of a flawed environment that encouraged it . 

 That isn't a blah Blah as you implied  it's important to state your case but I was arguing for  for a strategy that address's the root cause not the wilting branch.

What is needed is a strategy that alters peoples minds to the evil done rather than the person. Simply because  the acceptability of actions/causes can be fundementally altered.... but people can't (human nature must be a given). So why waste energy attacking something you can't change instead of something you might.

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 9:21:07 AM
 


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather. Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Liber...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterMelinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather. Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Liber...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Examples Educate

I will soon be doing an article on what the 'conditions' were at the time. The article will tell the story of Dr. Jennifer MacLeod, one of the first women through the glass ceiling. Dr. MacLeod did the right thing; Phyllis did the wrong thing. Both were determined, hard working and brilliant.

Individuals engage in behavior that benefits them. A few people will always be inclined to act unethically for their own benefit; a system that positively rewards unethical and illegal behavior, like ours, leads inevitably to total break down. Phyllis was one of the most pivotal elements for enabling that to take place. She therefore needs a high degree of smack down.

Vanishingly few women knew what she knew and had the skills to destroy a movement that could have made the foreward motion of the CorporaState impossible. That is why she was so well compensated. What she wanted most was fame and respect. She got that.

I want to make sure the next eager sell out decides it is not worth the risk.

The root cause is greed trumping the good of the society, and women, as a whole. I have been working on getting the ERA ratified since I realized what happened and urging others to do the same. The ERA should be one of the issues that receives maximum focus, that and then rescinding the power of the state to assert control over each of us.

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster (139 articles, 1 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 121 comments) on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 11:49:34 AM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Positive reinforcement

Good over evil isn't the root cause or one that you can do anything about....that’s a personal choice and human nature to think of self first. The problem is the society that encourages this type of thinking.

Tragically the good doesn't have all the brilliance in fact like Darth Vader discovered evil often pays better.Humans have the right to choose their path.The best we can do is make the good path more attractive.

I doubt that a woman see the examples I quoted would be discouraged by your scorn ( write and tell me what ERA is ? sorry for my ignorance)What you appear to be proposing is a deterrent. Deterrents have been show  to be ineffective or at best inefficient. ie Some states in US have capital punishment but it doesn't give them a better (lesser) capital crime rate than anywhere else in the world that doesn't have Capital Punishment.

Very few if any evil doers are discouraged by deterrents they simply build better barriers. Rarely does anyone do anything wrong while holding the belief that they'll get caught.

The concept of deterrent you  are putting forward seems to be based on the enforced superiority of your ideology, a view I have difficulty with. At least the enforcement bit anyway.Your criticism of this woman appears to be based on logically unstainably perceptions (see my fist comment)I do however applaud your intentions.

 Might I suggest a more positive approach then your message would be aimed at a wider audience, more interest, more support.People respond better to a positive reason ( to gain something than) one that carps and pontificates views and ideologies that may be foreign( different= threatening see GOP acceptance of Gays single mums etc).

 Does it matter who supports you (with in reason) so long as your message stays in tact? Good luck anyway

 

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 6:57:51 PM
 


Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather. Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Liber...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Melinda Pillsbury-FosterMelinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather. Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Liber...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Welcome to the Real World

Wow. You are so off topic it is amazing. This is not about existing ideologies; it is about the failure of ideologies applied like they are proven to work instead of understanding they are cute theories that are intended to entertain presumed intellectuals and enrich corporations.

Your confession of ignorance is funny.

The ERA is the Equal Rights Amendment. That is the Constitutional Amendment that would have given women equality under the law. Schlafly was the single individual responsible for the fact passage failed.

You perhaps want to be a rat to be experimented on. I do not. Neither do other ordinary Americans.

by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster (139 articles, 1 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 121 comments) on Monday, September 17, 2007 at 7:44:56 PM
 


EWE ARE ALL ASLEEP! ENJOY YOUR EMPIRE!
Joe RathbunEWE ARE ALL ASLEEP! ENJOY YOUR EMPIRE!

Ms Pillsbury (sorry hyphens are for egoists)

I have read a few of your "articles" (attack ads) here on OpEd. In the attack on Israel piece you wrote in June, you started your reply to a man named "Phil", with how many articles, diaries, etc., he had on OpEd, and then proceeded to state he was stereotyping you.

And what do you think you did to him with the first statement you made? And now here your hubris preceeds itself once again.

As I said, I have read alot of your articles here and in doing so was not even going to give you the satisfaction of attacking me. However, this attack on Andris was the last straw for me! Someone needs to let you know about yourself since you take it upon yourself to do so with your "articles" (which ususally contradict themselves and the hypocrisy within). With your "smack down" referrences you obviously watch the mind-numbing T.V. that is probably the root of your ideologies, explaining the flip-floping life you have led.

I've been taught to respect my elders. But I was also taught to spot fools. Rob probably needs to start editing you again instead of letting your asinine rhetoric demean everyone and everything who oppose you.

You claim to have written a book on avarice and yet seems to me in the "article" above you are simply jealous of it.Some of your "aricles"(which are littered with unfounded statements and questionable at best on the author) have some valid points, but they are always looking back instead of forward. Hind-sight is always 20/20 and you haven't even got that right.

It's people like you in this country constantly blaming others for all the problems we face (i.e. scapegoating Patraeus, the media and the emperor), that are the main reason for the empire rising today! Instead of standing up for what you believe is right and objecting, with intelligence and clarity, and providing positive solutions that are GROUNDED IN REALITY, you choose to take the easy road of overstating the OBVIOUS, and then don't even get that right!

I guess in this day and age they will let anyone with half a brain publish a book.

Question: how do you go from uninformed, to libertarian, to paleocon, to bitter feminist all in one life? You are an anti-semite at best, yet believe in God and being a good steward!

How can you bash the jewish people as a whole, who are God's chosen whether you like it or not (speculating on the root of your inconsistency), and still claim yourself as a "good person". All the while you condemn people with your "yak yak yak" and "you only have 0,0,0 record on this site" and then have the gall to act like the very "Big Brother Oil" system we "enjoy" now by looking people up, just to judge so called "accomplishments" or merits and base your reply or comment on that!!!!

So spare us any more of your uninformed, unintelligible, contradictory, "pro-wrestler" rants you call "articles" and start looking inside yourself to see who you are and figure that out first before inundating this great site of "free speech" with your flip-flop rhetoric!!!!! So now here is someone who has given you the excuse to attack, with intention, just so everyone can get a better idea of just how foolish you are (if they can't tell already)!!!!!!!!!!

by Joe Rathbun (8 articles, 4 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 142 comments) on Monday, September 24, 2007 at 11:29:03 AM
 


EWE ARE ALL ASLEEP! ENJOY YOUR EMPIRE!
Joe RathbunEWE ARE ALL ASLEEP! ENJOY YOUR EMPIRE!

As I suspected

Typical response from an introverted egoist such as yourself!!!!! Is this better? Oops! In my ignorance I forgot what color green is>>>>

by Joe Rathbun (8 articles, 4 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 142 comments) on Monday, September 24, 2007 at 12:07:03 PM
 

 

10 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

Senate testimony by police captain reveals 9 sticks of missing dynamite in 'Omaha Two' bombing case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular