Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon
Tell A Friend 187 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
1 comment

General News

The Kill Off: Depopulating America – Is Los Angeles first?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Has the Bush Administration made plans to kill of a portion of the present population of the United States for a reason that serves their ends?

If so, what are those ends and who is targeted for death? Might one target be you?

The subject seems to take us into a world that is more science fiction than reality but given the many things Bush Co. has done that make no sense unless you let the actions speak their truth through time it is probably a good idea to take all ideas seriously, at least until we check them out.

The means for accomplishing this eugenics project is, according to Janet Phelan, journalist and researcher, the water system. The Department of Water and Power in Los Angeles takes on a sinister character when you read the story written by Ms. Phelan. But it is a story you need to know.

Ask yourself. Are you an enemy of the United States? You might be surprised by what appears in the Patriot Act. Below is part of the story, written by Ms. Phelan. You need to know. Hear Ms. Phelan on The Water Conspiracies this Friday at 4pm Pacific time at on The Spiritual Politician

From Ms. Phelan's Article

Nearly three years have passed since the publication of “Public Extermination Project.” ( New information has surfaced supporting these claims. In addition, this reporter has determined some errors in the initial report, which mandate correcting.

A careful reading of Section 817 of the Patriot Act, “The Expansion of the Biological Weapons Statute,” reveals this to be the umbrella statute which is authorizing this project. While the wording of this statute is somewhat opaque, a diligent scrutiny of the language reveals its true intent.

Firstly, this statute is legalizing “delivery systems” and “toxins” under certain circumstances. “Delivery systems” is weapons terminology. “Toxins” are poisons. The statute details when these delivery systems and toxins will and will not be legal.

Poisons, as we all know, are meant to terminate, not enhance, life. There is no mention in 817 of these poisons being utilized as any sort of legally sanctioned punishment for a crime, such as lethal injection. Rather, the statute states that these SHALL be legal when used for purposes determined as “peaceful, protective, prophylactic or bona fide research.”
''(2) The term 'restricted person' means an individual who--
''(A) is under indictment for a crime punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year;
''(B) has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year;
''(C) is a fugitive from justice;
''(D) is an unlawful user of any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
''(E) is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
''(F) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
''(G) is an alien (other than an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence) who is a national of a
country as to which the Secretary of State, pursuant to section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), section 620A of chapter 1 of part M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or section 40(d) of chapter 3 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)), has made a determination (that remains in effect) that such country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism; or
''(H) has been discharged from the Armed Services of
the United States under dishonorable conditions.

Nowhere is there any mention of exclusive military dominion over these delivery systems and toxins. We therefore infer that this is NOT authorizing the use of poisons in warfare against an enemy of the United States of America.”

Is there anything that is too much for Bush Co.? His greed is only limited by his imagination. Now that is a scary thought. Join us this Friday.

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father (more...)
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sociopaths - They Prey on All of Us

Phyllis Schlafly's career as a NeoCon

Restore the Constitution; Indict Thomas Anderle.

The Octopus, Promis, and their offspring, molding the future of America

Mitt Romney Desperate to Hide Truth - Debate to take place


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
i find Melinda Pillsbury-Foster's article very... by tanya on Friday, Aug 31, 2007 at 5:48:58 AM