General News

'Daily Voting News' For February 29, 2008

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -
Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org

As hard as Sequoia must have had to search they actually found a way to blame the problem found on their machines in New Jersey on the poll worker. I am duly impressed. They even appear to admit that they stopped looking after they were able to figure out a way to blame the poor poll worker for the problem. "We identified a way in which poll worker error can result in the party turnout totals to be reported incorrectly." Did they look for any other potential answers for the problem? They don't say. Remember that the problem was the vote counts were correct, as far as anyone can know from a DRE, but the party totals did not match between the internal memory and the internal paper record. There were one or two Republican votes registered as being Democratic votes or vice versa. This only happened on 59 machines in 6 counties. Sequoia claims there was some special machinations poll workers used inside the control panel that allows them to select the R or D ballot for each voter. How did these machinations result in a different report on electronic memory from the paper memory? Also, why did it only happen once or twice on each machine? If a poll worker was making an error in the process why didn't that error happen much more often?? I have, again, requested that the EAC do their jobs and notify any potentially affected jurisdictions outside of New Jersey of this problem. They will ignore this problem as they have all previous problems with voting systems. Election officials in Pennsylvania counties that use these machines need to be made aware of the issues. Please pass on the word.

Late this afternoon it was reported that the first two pretests of Cuyahoga Co Ohio's new ES&S optical-scan machines were failures. The computer showed error messages during the first two tests. The third test was successful. What? Me Worry?...

  • NAtional: High voter turnout prompts resource concerns for Nov. LINK


  • NAtional: Get out the pencils: Paper ballots return LINK


  • CO: Coffman recertifies paper-ballot machines LINK


  • CO: Clerks rejoice at machines' recertification LINK


  • CO: Boulder County's election equipment recertified LINK


  • CO: Boulder County voting machines get OK
    Secretary of state clears way to use Hart InterCivic machines LINK
  • - Advertisement -


  • CO: Morgan County - Paper ballots? If so, clerks want mail-in LINK


  • FL: Touch-screen voting machines destined for parts recycler LINK


  • FL: Sarasota County - Sarasota 13: If the tests can't find it, never mind it? LINK


  • IN: Grant County – Editorial - Fewer polling sites a great idea for county LINK


  • KS: Legislation brings potential for satellite voting in Ford County LINK
  • - Advertisement -


  • NJ: Company explains voting machine errors LINK


  • NM: Herrera: Human Error, Revised Lists At Fault For Caucus Troubles LINK


  • OH: Ohio elections chief: Primary will be smooth, have huge turnout LINK


  • Next Page  1  |  2

     

    www.votersunite.org

    John is the Executive Director of VotersUnite.Org

    Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


    Go To Commenting

    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Writers Guidelines

    Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
    - Advertisement -

    Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

    'Daily Voting News' For December 10, 2006

    ES&S Pouts, Stamps Foot, Complies Anyway, After Minor Spanking by the EAC

    The Approaching 2006 E-Voting 'Train Wreck'-Investigations and Problems Continue to Spread

    Comments

    The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

    This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    No comments