Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 19, 2008 at 13:06:53

View Ratings | Rate It

McCain Defends 'Enron Loophole'

by Jason Leopold     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

Also published at my new investigative news magazine, The Public Record.

Sen. John McCain says he opposes the $307 billion farm bill because it would dole out wasteful subsidies, but his chief economic adviser Phil Gramm also wants to stop its proposed regulation of energy futures trading, a market that was famously abused when Enron Corp. manipulated California’s electricity prices in 2001.

Clearing the way for that California price gouging, Gramm, as a powerful Texas senator in 2000, slipped an Enron-backed provision into the Commodities Futures Modernization Act that exempted from regulation energy trading on electronic platforms.

Then, over the next year, Enron – with Gramm’s wife Wendy serving on its board of directors – worked to create false electricity shortages in California, bilking consumers out of an estimated $40 billion.

Gramm left the Senate in 2002 but now has emerged as what Fortune magazine calls “McCain’s econ brain,” not only filling the Arizona senator’s acknowledged void on economic expertise (“I don’t know as much about the economy as I should”) but recognized as one of McCain’s closest friends in politics. The two men talk daily.

A McCain aide told me that the Arizona senator opposes the farm bill because it “rewards lobbyists” by granting rich farmers lucrative subsidies, although he would support “a reasonable level of assistance and risk management to farmers when they need America's help.”

But the aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the presumptive Republican presidential nominee also opposes the farm bill because Gramm advised McCain that he should resist its regulatory language on the energy futures market.

Democrats have dubbed that gap in energy futures regulation the “Enron loophole,” but it played a part, too, in the more recent attempt by the Amaranth Advisers hedge fund to corner the national gas market by shifting trades to the unregulated “dark markets” of the Intercontinental Exchange.

The “Enron loophole” also has become part of the debate over the soaring price of oil. Last week, a study sponsored by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, concluded that speculative futures markets were partly to blame for the surge in oil prices that have pushed gas at the pump toward $4 a gallon.

At a May 15 news conference, Levin said the skyrocketing price of oil is “not the result of supply and demand. Speculators have taken over most of the futures market."

However, the 673-page farm bill, containing the regulatory provisions on electronic energy trading, still faces obstacles amid overall concerns about the bill’s largesse to farmers at a time of rising food prices.

President George W. Bush has vowed to veto the bill, although it cleared the House and Senate by margins wide enough for an override, assuming Republicans don’t rally behind Bush and McCain, their current and future standard bearers.

Gramm and Enron

The battle over the “Enron loophole” also could draw attention to McCain’s dependence on Gramm as his chief economic adviser and Gramm’s key role in passing legislation that let Enron trade commodities on electronic platforms without federal oversight.

In 2000, with the Republicans in charge of Congress and Gramm chairing the Senate Banking Committee, the exemption on electronic trading was approved without a Senate hearing.

Internal Enron documents, which were released in 2002, revealed that the Houston-based company helped write the legislation, which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in December 2000.

Freed from regulatory interference, Enron then used manipulative trading practices to game the California electricity market and drive up electricity prices across the state.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.pubrecord.org

Jason Leopold is editor of the online investigative news magazine The Public Record, http://www.pubrecord.org, and the author of the National Bestseller, "News Junkie," a memoir. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview. He is also a two-time (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for " California Commodities"
Mineral Commodities of California - Bulletin 156, 1950
by The Staff of State of California

$11.99

Number of pages:
Publisher: State of California

The Economics Of Commodity Promotion Programs: Lessons From California

$83.95
Lowest New Price $213.71

Number of pages: 428
Publisher: Peter Lang Publishing

Mineral commodity report, silica: 1985 (Special publication / California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology)
by Michael A Silva

$29.95

Number of pages: 15
Publisher: California Dept. of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology

Mineral Commodities of California: Geological Occurrence, Economic Development and Utilization of the State's Mineral Resources, Bulletin 176
by Olaf P. Jenkins

$14.65

Number of pages: 736
Publisher: California Division of Mines

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments


Why Aren't the Gramms in Jail?

Seems to me what Phil Gramm and his wife did to aid the criminals at Enron should be a prosecutable offense.  Instead of being a principal advisor to a presidential candidate Gramm should be cooling his heels in a federal prison.  I am one of those "old ladies in California" energy traders at Enron joked about fleecing and I am still mad as hell.   See "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room"  click here

by macdon1 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 113 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 1:37:55 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Closing "Enron Loophole" Is a Small Band-Aid

 

The proposed regulation of energy futures trading in the farm bill to close the “Enron loophole” will not have much affect on oil/gas prices. For over a year, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has voluntarily been providing the information that will be required after the “Enron loophole”. Gas prices keep going up. Why? There is much more involved. The investment banks, government regulators that do not regulate, lobbyists, Congress that does not enact effective regulation, etc.

Our Confusing Economy, Explained (audio) (listen to the end where Greenberger talks about former CFTC Commissioners getting jobs at exchanges, resulting in several million dollar a year salaries. Greenberger also says, "Help Wall Street out and Wall Street will help you out."

Michael Greenberger is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Law and the director of the University's Center for Health and Homeland Security. Greenberger is a former Director of the Division of Trading and Markets at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. He has also testified before congress two or three times a year for several years.

"Gramm was the biggest of the big guns behind the 1999 repeal of the banking regulations — the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act — which was officially called The Financial Services Modernization Act."

In this highly educational interview, Mr. Greenberger discusses how Phil Gramm led repeal of Depression-era banking regulations:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89338743

 CFTC Does Not Believe in the Laws - only interested investment banks and exchanges:

http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/hearings/hearing31/greenberger.pdf

June 26, 2002 | Foxes guarding the chicken coop - President Bush's nominees to the agency that should have regulated Enron instead helped write the rules that let the company do whatever it wanted in the first place. By Damien Cave Judging by President Bush's two nominees to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), who appeared at Senate hearings on Tuesday, the answer is no. http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/06/26/cftc/index1.html


 

"In the long term, gasoline prices will soon continue their rapid rise, because those prices have little relationship to supply/demand factors (and) are being manipulated upward by energy traders," he said.

http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/business/story.html?id=ecb962b7-7837-42f8-ad2c-f201d1a0f6bd

 
"In the long term, gasoline prices will soon continue their rapid rise, because those prices have little relationship to supply/demand factors (and) are being manipulated upward by energy traders," he said.

 

by Julie Johnson (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 30 comments) on Friday, May 23, 2008 at 12:00:43 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Tampa, FL - UnitedHealth to Enter Funeral Parlor Industry by James Dunham

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

The Real Cause of the Current Financial Crisis by Joe Reeser

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Did Obama Appoint People With Track Record of Making Right Decisions? by Ralph Nader

The true face of politics as 467,000 jobs were shed by Mary MacElveen

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum