General News

FINALLY: Someone is telling the U.S. Gov't where to put its e-voting

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -
Black Box Voting was invited to submit comments into the record for the United States Election Assistance Commission's Round Table, which featured and agenda entirely devoted to a what is basically a celebration of computerized vote-counting. We took this opportunity to tell it like it is.

Discuss this here: http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/73717.html

To our great surprise and joy, so did others, including Dr. Rebecca Mercuri and Brad Friedman. Portions of some of their testimony will follow. Here are the formal comments from Black Box Voting:

EAC VOTING ADVOCATES ROUND TABLE: April 24, 2008

I have accepted your invitation to submit the following comments to be entered into the record on behalf of Black Box Voting, by its founder, Bev Harris.

To members of the EAC and participants of the Round Table:
- Advertisement -


The entire premise of technology-based elections is based on support for the "verifiable voting" concept. But before designing technology for elections, we must first determine how it will empower citizen controls, enabling the counting of votes in public rather than counting them in secret. We do not consent to any form of secret vote counting, administered and controlled by government insiders and their vendors.

Any system that forces the citizenry to trust government insiders to count their votes represents a change in the original design of this nation. The United States of America was designed to uphold the right of citizen sovereignty over the government. In addition to hiding the counting of votes from public view, computer-counted elections hide the chain of custody of the vote data. Citizens are never allowed to view the original input in order to compare it to the output, and are relegated to trusting circumstantial evidence controlled by insiders. Such a system is, in fact, a transfer of power.

The people were never asked to approve such a transfer of power, have never consented to it, and indeed CANNOT consent, because the right of sovereignty over the instruments of government which we have created is an inalienable right, one which CANNOT be given away, nor can this right be removed through legislation. It is, admittedly, possible for a government to decline to honor this right, but such an act would justify extreme measures by the people subjected to such abuse of power.

It is the public counting that is key to citizen sovereignty, not computer verification. "Verification" of a computer report is not at all the same as public vote counting.

The core of elections was and again must return to the principle of citizen sovereignty over government. Elections can never be based on a requirement to trust government insiders and their vendors to count our votes, nor can elections be dependent on experts to tell the citizenry that the system is okay, nor should the detailed mechanics of elections be impossible for the average citizen to understand. Models which depend on experts and insiders create centralized control, and remove all control from government's rightful owners – the citizens. This represents a violation of the principles laid out in the Declaration of Independence.

Not only does my organization, Black Box Voting, refuse to participate in the design of such systems, but we will do our utmost to inform the populace that such systems must be revoked, by whatever means necessary.

"We do not consent."

Bev Harris
Black Box Voting
330 SW 43rd St Suite K
PMB 547
Renton WA 98057

* * * * *

And other comments:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.blackboxvoting.org

Bev Harris is executive director of Black Box Voting, Inc. an advocacy group committed to restoring citizen oversight to elections.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Black Box Voting: WISCONSIN VOTE SPREAD 29,207? 7,500? Or 6,744?

Dear Maine GOP: 1+1+1 does not = 4. Official results are wrong

2008 election results to be routed to private middlemen in Illinois, Colorado & Kentucky

Racial Profiling on Tennessee Voter Reg Cards

BIPARTISANLY YOURS: COAKLEY WON THE HAND COUNTS

Recount - Is Dennis Kucinich walking into a trap?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

maybe some of the dunderheads in Congress will fin... by Susan Nelsen on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:28:22 PM
So, when has rule of law meant anything to the cur... by Roger on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:45:17 PM
Right on - Transparency and Accountability of elec... by August Adams on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:46:59 PM
The internet is connecting the world and allowing ... by How Kuff on Saturday, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:34:31 AM
Your concept has insiders and programmers controll... by Bev Harris on Saturday, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21:46 PM
I have read a lot about the dangers of voting by I... by How Kuff on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 6:52:33 AM
I have spent hundreds of hours with coun... by Bev Harris on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:12:54 PM
Good for you, Bev.  In a USA apparently in pe... by Scott Griffith on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:36:44 PM
From my vantage point our country and our election... by How Kuff on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:03:03 PM
1. The contract between citizens and elected offic... by john de herrera on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:21:12 PM