General News

FINALLY: Someone is telling the U.S. Gov't where to put its e-voting

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -
FROM DR. REBECCA MERCURI TO THE EAC: "Another VVSG rewrite, novel designs, or more extensive testing cannot begin to solve these problems until the voters' demands for Transparency, reliability, security, accuracy and auditability requirements have first been appropriately defined and addressed. So long as the goal of certification trumps the need to ensure election integrity, the resulting systems, no matter whose imprimatur they bear, will be invalid and must be rejected."

FROM BRAD FRIEDMAN TO THE EAC, of the BradBlog: "The blizzard of technical specifications serves only to obscure the fact that, even if such specifications are followed to the satisfaction of federal testers, it will likely continue to remain next to impossible for citizen voters to determine for themselves whether or not reported election results are truly accurate.

"In eight simple words, certainly far fewer than 598 pages, or even the 6 pages of this document, we defined the heart of the mission I challenge all Americans . whether public servant, advocate, vendor or elected official to join... is simply: To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy....That ideal must underscore every effort we take today, tomorrow, and in the months and years ahead, as we all work to ensure the continued citizen ownership of a transparent, participatory democracy.

"That must become your mission at the EAC. Meeting that ideal must underscore your adoption of any new federal voting system guidelines. If we can't see it, we can't trust it. If it does not aid in the mission to encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy, it must not be adopted or implemented.

FROM JOHN WASHBURN TO THE EAC: " To a large degree technology is not the solution to the problem. Technology is the problem. The needs are conflicting to the technology design because there is no consensus in the larger social, political, and legal worlds as to what is a successful election. It is not the place of the TDGC to balance these needs and election virtues. An evaluation of the technical options available cannot be made until a rough consensus in the political, legal, and social world has emerged."

* * * * *
- Advertisement -

See also: "The Myth of Verified Voting":

In a logical inversion that only Alice in Wonderland could love, that which was sold to the American public as a "solution" to the Florida voter disenfranchisement actually expanded Florida-style disenfranchisement to all 50 states....

* * * * *
Black Box Voting
330 SW 43rd St Suite K
PMB 547
Renton WA 98057

Black Box Voting is supported entirely by individual citizen donations.
- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2

Bev Harris is executive director of Black Box Voting, Inc. an advocacy group committed to restoring citizen oversight to elections.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Black Box Voting: WISCONSIN VOTE SPREAD 29,207? 7,500? Or 6,744?

Dear Maine GOP: 1+1+1 does not = 4. Official results are wrong

2008 election results to be routed to private middlemen in Illinois, Colorado & Kentucky

Racial Profiling on Tennessee Voter Reg Cards


Recount - Is Dennis Kucinich walking into a trap?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

maybe some of the dunderheads in Congress will fin... by Susan Nelsen on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:28:22 PM
So, when has rule of law meant anything to the cur... by Roger on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:45:17 PM
Right on - Transparency and Accountability of elec... by August Adams on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:46:59 PM
The internet is connecting the world and allowing ... by How Kuff on Saturday, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:34:31 AM
Your concept has insiders and programmers controll... by Bev Harris on Saturday, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21:46 PM
I have read a lot about the dangers of voting by I... by How Kuff on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 6:52:33 AM
I have spent hundreds of hours with coun... by Bev Harris on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:12:54 PM
Good for you, Bev.  In a USA apparently in pe... by Scott Griffith on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:36:44 PM
From my vantage point our country and our election... by How Kuff on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:03:03 PM
1. The contract between citizens and elected offic... by john de herrera on Sunday, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:21:12 PM