Tags for This Article:

Military (2651)  Energy (495)  Weapons (491)  Washington (361)  Technology (327)  Radio (74)  Engineering (46) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 30, 2008 at 15:21:51

Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel

by Andrew Johnson (Posted by Andrew Johnson)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

14th and 18th January 2008, Washington DC, USA - In two appearances on a Washington DC Pacifica Radio Station, WPFW, on a show hosted by Author and Political Commentator Ambrose I. Lane, Sr., Dr. Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, and John Hutchison, experimental scientist, discussed how photographic and video evidence suggest that the World Trade Centre (WTC) towers were destroyed using Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Many of the observed effects resemble those seen in John Hutchison’s experiments.

In early January 2008, Wood posted a new study on her website (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ), which relates effects seen in photographs taken before, during and after the destruction of the WTC complex, to effects seen in Hutchison’s ongoing experiments. Wood and Hutchison co-authored the study.

John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been working with “field effects” for almost 30 years. The Hutchison Effect is a collection of phenomena discovered accidentally by John Hutchison in 1979 during attempts to reproduce the work of Nikola Tesla. Hutchison uses radio frequency and electrostatic sources. The Hutchison Effect occurs in a volume of space where the beams intersect and interfere. The results are levitation of heavy objects, fusion of dissimilar materials such as metal and wood, anomalous melting (without heating) of metals without burning adjacent material, spontaneous fracturing of metals (which separate by sliding in a sideways fashion), and both temporary and permanent changes in the crystalline structure and physical properties of metal samples.

Hutchison has reproduced his experiments many times and the results are recorded on video and have been included in a number of TV documentaries that focus on unusual scientific experiments. Hutchison’s metal samples have been repeatedly tested by scientists, including a group at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, confirming Hutchison Effects. The article by Wood and Hutchison (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ) documents effects and events seen in the vicinity of the World Trade Centre and compares these with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. The observed effects include:

“Weird Fires” - The fires seen near the badly damaged cars do not seem to ignite nearby office paper. Some photos show firefighters walking very close to or even through the fires. A video by John Hutchison shows similar looking “fires” on a model metal boat.

Bent Beams and “Jellification” - Samples that Hutchison produced show very unusual effects on metal. Sometimes the metal “jellifies,” turning soft and losing form, leading to severe bending or fracturing of the sample. Sometimes samples erupt from the centre and sometimes they turn to dust, similar to what happened to the WTC on 9/11.

Ongoing reactions - Hutchison’s samples often show an ongoing reaction, even after the energy field is removed. This “non-self-quenching” reaction seems to occur at the nuclear level. This also appears to be happening at Ground Zero (GZ). Dr. Wood’s study suggests that the WTC site is still being “decontaminated,” with trucks moving dirt into and out of the site, while “hosing down operations” continue, which Dr. Wood and Andrew Johnson photographed and recorded on video in January 2008.

Transmutation - Sometimes materials subjected to the Hutchison Effect seem to change at a molecular or even atomic level. This could be the explanation for the apparent rapid rusting at GZ, where steel rusts like iron. Also, some photographs show unusual effects on the aluminium cladding used on the twin towers that look similar to effects produced on Hutchison’s aluminum samples. Wood, Hutchison, and Johnson appeared on two Ambrose Lane shows, “We Ourselves,” and discussed the similarities between the WTC event and the experimental evidence produced by the Hutchison Effect. “I have been collecting data over the last year and a half or so and I have found these distinct and unusual characteristics, which I have given names such as ‘fuming’ and ‘toasted’ cars – I have even noticed flipped cars in some pictures,” said Wood. “In some cases, the flipped cars are sitting next to trees that are fully covered with leaves.” “If the flipping of the cars was caused by big explosions or ‘wind’ from the towers coming down,” asked Johnson, “how did the leaves stay on the trees?” Material scientist George Hathaway observes that the Hutchison Effect causes either lift or disruption of the material itself. Lift explains the flipped cars. (http://drjudywood.com/pdf/HutchisonEffectReport_txt.pdf)

In some of his experiments, Hutchison observed “spontaneous combustion” where “fires appeared out of nowhere.” He also confirmed that Col. John Alexander and others from the U.S. military visited him in 1983 and filmed his experiments with a team from Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL). (http://www.weourselves.org/mp3/wpfw_011808_judy-andrew2.mp3 ) Canadian MP Chuck Cook and Dr Lorn A Kuehne of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) contacted him in 1986 and told him his work was “a matter of National Security.” (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html) Hutchison says he’s been told that defense contractor, S.A.I.C., has his technology and has been developing it. (http://drjudywood.com/media/071212_JohnHutchison-TruthH.mp3 )

Asked about ongoing dirt removal and hosing down at the WTC complex, Hutchison commented, “I think there is an ongoing reaction or ‘infection.’” Wood noted that the damage done to the Bankers Trust (Deutsche Bank) building was repaired, but then they decided to take the building down. This evidence indicates there is a continuing reaction there. Rusting beams in the Bankers Trust building and in the temporary PATH train station also suggest ongoing reactions too.

At the end of the first show, a caller said, “This is a revelation beyond revelations…this trumps everything…If this story ever gets out, it will change the course of the United States’ and the whole world’s history.”

Another caller said during the second show, “I am thinking that these revelations we are hearing this morning should have the people so excited and so outraged that they should be flooding the lines to their congressmen and news people to get this message out as the number one story of the year.”

For more information please see: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/

WPFW Related:

http://www.weourselves.org/ http://www.wpfw.org/

 

Contact Editor

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments

I am an individual who is interested in exposing the true events of the 9/11 attacks.
CB BrooklynI am an individual who is interested in exposing the true events of the 9/11 attacks.

9/11 "Inside Job" Court Cases

9/11 "Inside Job" Court Cases

US District Court,
Southern District of New York,
with Attorney Jerry Leaphart:




** Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD
Title: Wood v. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al
Judge: George B. Daniels


** Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case

Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GEL
Title: Dr. Morgan O. Reynolds v. Science Applications International Corp. et al
Judge: George B. Daniels

 

 

The 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement"
were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 382 comments) on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 5:30:42 PM
 


I am an individual who is interested in exposing the true events of the 9/11 attacks.
CB BrooklynI am an individual who is interested in exposing the true events of the 9/11 attacks.

Videos

British Journalist Nick Cook Discusses "The Hutchison Effect": Video

Dr Judy Wood Discusses The Basic Evidence That Directed Energy Weapons Were A Causal Factor In The Destruction Of The World Trade Center: Videos

by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 382 comments) on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 5:46:09 PM
 


DEW does exist and we have paid dearly for that existence.
RuGBYZHGDEW does exist and we have paid dearly for that existence.

A Timeline of Dr. Wood's Work

It’s interesting that she noticed the effects through her research (including her Request for Correction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the government agency tasked with the analysis of the WTC destruction, and Qui Tam case representing the American People against government contractor complicity with WTC destruction) as well as contractors with NIST who either produce or are involved in acquisition of knowledge about Directed Energy Weaponry (DEW). She was assisted by Andrew Johnson of the UK, author of the analysis of the eyewitness accounts by FDNY and John Hutchison himself.

Links to a presentation by Dr. Wood in Madison, WI asking the attendees to think about what she presents and decide for themselves whether they believe what we were told or their lying eyes:

http://drjudywood.com/videos/Hiroshima_videos.html

I encourage everyone to view the video presentation by Dr. Wood at Madison. It is an eye-opener. The skeptics in the audience were silenced and by the end of the presentation were convince beyond a shadow of a doubt that her findings were right on.

http://drjudywood.com/

Also included in this page, are presentations by Dr. Wood’s attorney, Jerry V. Leaphart.

Dr. Wood’s comprehensive analyses of all physical evidence at the WTC include:

1. A simple scientific exercise to understand the impossibility of the collapse times of the WTC towers by a minimum of 8-900%,

Billiard Ball Example

http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html

2. An analysis via pictorial evidence of the WTC complex disproving the official “collapse” theory as well as “popular” co-called Truth theories:

http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html

3. Further pictorial analysis of the WTC including the phenomena prior to, during, and after the destruction of the buildings as well as the aftermath including the cleanup of the site. This analysis includes evaluations of the various dust phenomena as well as the methods for containment of an environmental disaster using topsoil that continues to this day.

http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt1.html

4. This paper is the subject of the press release. It compares the physical phenomena seen at the WTC including spontaneous fires of metal objects, instantaneous rusting of steel, flipped cars, toasted (what appear to be burned out) cars, unusual effects on surrounding buildings, including the breakdown of glass and ceramic materials, as well as the infection of the Bankers Trust Building which was initially repaired and is now being disassembled, and the PATH train entrance at the WTC which has been rebuilt and re-infected three times. Why else has the site not been built upon. There is too much money to be made to leave this valuable property vacant. See how fast WTC 7 was rebuilt.

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/

At the bottom is an analysis performed by Andrew Johnson and others (including yours truly) in which the testimonies of EMC and fire personnel at the WTC during the events of the morning of 9/11 describe what was seen, heard, and felt. Note that many of the testimonies have been redacted (why on earth would they need to be redacted? Did the terrorists give secret codes?), but those that have not indicate that there was no sound of a jet plane during the explosion at WTC 2, the second tower hit that morning. For those few (a handful) noting a noise, it is highly conflicting and in only one or two instances, did anyone note a jet. No one noted that they ducked for cover or noticed the sound for any extended period of time. I personally spoke with a witness to the second attack while returning home from NY in October and he did not remember hearing anything until just before the explosion at WTC 2. He was at a loss for why he didn’t hear the plane coming in like a kamikaze. Further, he also understood the pile to be extremely hot, but recalls no steam explosions similar to that seen in Manhattan last summer despite the fact that much water was sprayed on the pile as well as rain that fell on the pile.

See the following links for the legal actions taken by Drs. Wood and Morgan Reynolds against NIST and in Qui Tam form:

http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Further analyses of the plane impacts by Morgan Reynolds proving the impossibility of the disappearance of the planes into the WTC towers can be found here:

http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911

It’s this simple. Had the buildings fallen on the planes (much slower than the planes were going) what would happen to the plane? Smashed, right? Big, heavy object (building) vs. light (relatively speaking) hollow aluminum can. Who wins? See Newton’s third law of Motion.

http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/Class/newtlaws/u2l4a.html

 

Emergency Responder Testimony - No Planes

1.1 Going in Search of Planes in NYC


Andrew Johnson ( \n ad.johnson@ntlworld.com )

Oct 2007

Based on a report which contains
Contributions by

Morgan Reynolds s Russ Gerst s Jeff Strahl
CB Brooklyn
s Cathy Palmer

1.2 Listening to Those Who Were There

As we continue to delve into what happened on Sept 11 2001, we seem to be uncovering more evidence that some very strange things were happening near and at the World Trade Center in New York City when the towers were destroyed.

A re-examination of videos of the plane crashes and both the actual destruction of the towers and the aftermath seems to strongly suggest or even prove that (a) unconventional weaponry destroyed the towers and (b) the stories of large planes hitting the towers are bogus. For (a) one can simply ask “Where did the building go?” (and no, it wasn’t “into the basements”). For (b) one can simply ask “How can a hollow tube made of light materials cut through multiple steel girders, with little or no deceleration?”

A repeated pondering of the answers to questions (a) and (b) can lead on to a re-examination of other data about 9/11. Such a re-examination of existing data was proposed by Attorney Jerry Leaphart, in September 2007. Jerry brought to our attention the accounts / “oral histories” as given by over 500 Emergency Service “First Responders” to the 9/11 Tragedy, as posted on the New York Times Website, at the link given below.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html

These accounts were published on 12th August 2005. Jerry originally tasked us with analysing the accounts of the responders to see what was contained in their accounts of 9/11 about seeing the plane crashes – particularly the 2nd one. We therefore shared our findings and they are discussed in the report linked at the end of this article.

1.3 Tribute

However, I must pause for a moment and say that, whatever the conclusions of this study and however it is interpreted, we must pay a large tribute and debt of thanks to those people who responded on the day of 9/11 and think of the lives they undoubtedly saved and the injuries they helped to prevent. Many of them have suffered severely due to the adverse long term health effects of the dust they worked in while working to save people. I hope for their sake, too, that we can learn the truth about 9/11.

1.4 Delving Deeper

I decided to go “one step further” and, once I had downloaded all 500 accounts, I used text searching software to scan all the accounts and determine, primarily where each person was when the 2nd plane is supposed to have hit the tower. I also tried to determine where witnesses were when the 1st crash occurred. I then entered all this information into a database, which allowed me to more easily count who saw or heard the 2nd plane. (All the details of how this was done are contained in the report.)

In going through the accounts, I also decided to look for any use the words “Missile” or “Rocket”, “Plane Parts”, “Luggage/Suitcases”, “Landing Gear” and witnesses hearing the F-15/F-16 planes. The witness accounts of the latter are particularly interesting to compare to their accounts of the sound of the 2nd Boeing, before impact.

A number of reports of FBI Agents talking about a possible “3rd Plane” heading for New York were also discovered, along with a number of other accounts of witnesses describing anomalous occurrences.

1.5 “I Saw The Plane… I Heard The Plane…”

The words “plane jet airplane aircraft” were found in 426 accounts, 1770 times. The final account Sample Size was used for the “Witnesses to a plane” study was 291. A few of those who simply described seeing the impacts on TV were left out, but some were included – the main focus of the study was on those who were close to where the 2nd impact happened.

16 witnesses reported seeing the 1st plane before impact and 16 witnesses reported hearing the 1st plane before impact but only 1 Witness reported clearly seeing and hearing plane 1 before impact.

I managed to establish that at least 96 witnesses were near the WTC (with ½ a mile) at time of 2nd impact and a further 21 witnesses were inside one of the WTC buildings at the time of the 2nd impact. This gave a total of 117 witnesses who were near or the Inside WTC buildings at the time of 2nd impact.

  • Only 19 of the witnesses near the WTC reported actually seeing plane 2 before impact and, as a percentage of total number near the WTC, this was 20%.
  • Only 20 of the witnesses near the WTC reported actually hearing plane 2 before impact and as a percentage of total number near the WTC, this was 21%.
  • Only 8 of the witnesses near the WTC reported actually seeing and hearing plane 2 before impact and as a percentage of total number near the WTC, this was 8.3%.
  • Of those witnesses inside one of the WTC buildings at the time of the 2nd impact, only 2 reported hearing the plane (none saw it). As a percentage of the total of those inside WTC, this was 9.5%.
  • There were 117 witnesses inside or near the WTC and 291 witnesses in the total sample I used. The percentages given below, then, are therefore based on the number 291 – 117 giving a total of 174.
  • There were 33 witnesses who were further than ½ mile from the WTC Complex and reported seeing plane 2 before impact. As a percentage of the total of those who were further than ½ mile from WTC Complex, this was 19%.
  • There were 2 witnesses who were further than ½ mile from the WTC Complex and reported hearing plane 2 before impact. As a percentage of the total of those who were further than ½ mile from WTC Complex, this was 1.1%.
1.6 “I Wasn’t Initially Sure it Was A Plane”

Quite a few witnesses were not at all sure that large planes had been responsible for the damage at the WTC. Accounts where they said “I didn’t realize it was a plane at the time” or “I only realized later it was a plane” were studied. Due to the different ways witnesses described being unsure about the true nature of the crash, it was difficult to pick out keywords to find these accounts. (Most of these accounts were discovered in reading them for other parts of this study.) Time limitations may have prevented finding them all.

A number of witnesses reported that they didn’t realize that the second impact was that of a plane – many of them “found out later”. This is in direct contradiction to those who reported to seeing plane parts, engine parts and landing gear. For example, from the account of Patricia Ondrovic (File No: 9110048):

I saw a police captain that I knew, and he came out to me. He looked absolutely terrified, he was shaking, he was pale, he was sweating. I looked at him, I said what's wrong? He said there's another plane headed our way, and they just blew up the Pentagon. I said, another plane? What are you talking about? I hadn't realized that planes had hit this, I thought they just set bombs off. I didn't realize when I got there that planes hit it. I said, what do you mean another plane? He said two planes hit the World Trade Center. So I'm thinking a little Cessena. How can a little Cessena do all that damage? He said no, 757s. I said big things? See I was there for about 25 minutes before I knew that planes had crashed into this.

Similarly, the account of EMT David Timothy (File No. 9110156) expressed some doubt that he saw a plane.

The next thing I heard was a loud like an engine roar. I looked up, and the next thing I knew I just saw -- I don't know if it was the tail end of the plane or what, but I saw something. When I looked up, I heard ‘boom’. I'm sorry, the north tower was the first one. The south tower then got hit when we were right there.

Perhaps even more significant was where 2 witnesses who were standing next to each other, initially, did not agree upon the idea of a plane crash. From the account of Scott Holowach (File No: 9110114)

At that time Chief Ganci was behind me and he thought there was another explosion in the north tower and that's when I turned around and said Chief, listen, there is a second plane that hit the other tower. He was like no no no no, we have another explosion. I said no, Chief, I witnessed it. I watched the plane hit the other tower. He is like are you sure. I said Chief, I'm 100 hundred percent positive I watched the second plane hit the other tower.

There was some additional confusion and rumours circulating about the nature of any planes involved. From the account of Anthony Bartolomey (File No: 9110013)

Q. When you arrived there, did any civilians report anything to you?

A. Yes. Numerous civilians were telling me that a plane had hit the building. There were discrepancies as to the type of plane. Some were saying it was a Cessna or Leer jet type, a small jet plane. Some said it was a large passenger plane. One person actually said that it was like a military style plane that actually shot missiles into the building.

There are other instances of this type of confusion. The account of Peter Fallucca (File No: 9110388) mentions a “fireball or something” and a missile attack as witnessed by a police officer:

It was a big fireball or something from the plane I guess, came from across the street in front of our rig, and as we get out of the rig, there's a cop, city police officer, in the street. He's telling us, "I'm getting out of here. I just saw a rocket." He said he saw it come off the Woolworth Building and hit the tower.

1.7 Landing Gear and Tires

There were over 10 different reports of Landing Gear being found. Some of these put the Landing Gear on Vesey Street, West Street, in s Parking Lot (which may be on West or Vesey Street), in a Jacuzzi, on top of a woman or in Rector Street. From the account of Dean Coutsouros (File No: 9110049)

…we got in front of 90 West Street, we held up there for a few minutes underneath the scaffolding to reassess the situation, how we were going to get into the building. There was all kinds of human debris. The landing gear of the aircraft was in that parking lot there. There was all kinds of stuff all over the floor.

From the account of John Breen (File No: 9110321)

We did see part of -- I didn't see it, but Jeff Johnson told me later on he did see part of the landing gear actually fell right through the roof and it was in one of the Jacuzzis in another room.

With 4 apparently separate reports of aircraft landing gear or tires being found in different locations, it is difficult to believe that these the tires genuinely could have survived the crash. For example, from the account of Steve Grabher (File No: 9110241):

We came right down West Street, down here. We couldn't get too close, because by the time we got near 2 World Trade Center people were jumping off the roof like crazy. Landing near the hotel and the street was littered with body parts. I don't know if it was from the plane or what. But there was just body parts all over the place. Chunks of meat. I saw an airplane tire. I walked past an airplane tire. What looked like an airplane tire. Again we were looking up the whole time.

Reading accounts like this, and seeing the picture of the tire under the scaffolding, one is immediately reminded of the story of the survival of Mohammad Atta’s passport.

Similarly, the sightings of luggage and suitcases do not seem to be explainable other than by the idea that this evidence was planted – how could such items survive the enormous impact and fireball, which is said to have been sufficient to destroy the WTC’s structural integrity?

1.8 Federal Bureau of … Information…?

It seems like there were a good number of FBI agents on the scene – at least one of them seemed to be promulgating reports of a 3rd plane being en route to NYC. How were they so sure, considering the confusion in the “fog of war”? Terence Rivera’s account (File No: 9110343) has some interesting details.

There was a -- he wasn't a regular security guard. He had a weapon on him. I don't know if he was FBI or Secret Service and he was trying to put the pants out on one individual that was conscious. His pants were still smoldering. I took the can, fire extinguisher off the truck and then sprayed down the pants on the person that was still conscious. At that time, I had asked him where did this individual [had] come from. He told me when the plane had hit, a fire ball had shot down the elevator shaft and had blown people out of the lobby

Sometime while we were doing that, that same individual that was -- when we first got there, that was trying to put the pants out, he came over and he is saying to us that it's a terrorist attack. You guys are too close. It's a terrorist attack.

Then I went -- that same individual, the security or -- he told me to go over to the command post and let them know it's a terrorist attack. There are more planes in the air.

With repeated accounts of the FBI agents mentioning a 3rd plane attack was imminent, one is given the impression that they were unwittingly or deliberately promoting the plane stories at a time when the picture of what was happening was very likely still not at all clear.

1.9 Hearing the F15’s/F16’s

There seemed to be more consistency in the witnesses who reported hearing the F15’s/F16’s than the sounds of a Boeing (other witnesses may have reported these as different planes). From the account of Robert Larocco (File No: 9110081):

At that point we hear a plane -- it turned out to be two planes, and they were closing in on us and the motors were getting louder and louder. All eyes went up to the sky and were looking. I kind of thought to myself as I looked at guys running for their lives and for cover that now we're going to get kamikazed. The rescue workers, they are trying to take us out. I stood there and looked at the sky all around in all directions and couldn't really tell where the sound was coming from. It was getting louder and louder. Then I spotted them, they were coming out of the west, like out of Jersey City, that way. They were two F15 fighters.

1.10Strange Events

On page 13 of his account, Paramedic Robert Ruiz (File No. 9110333) describes an apparently spontaneous car fire:

Like things weren't bad enough already, the car that's parked right on that corner catches on fire. I don't mean a little fire, the entire thing. Don't ask me how. The entire car caught on fire. You would think maybe just a motor part or just the engine part. But this entire car just goes up in fire.

In his account (File no: 9110179), Frank Cruthers, Fire Chief mentions WTC 7 was expected to collapse:

Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area –

Q. A collapse zone?

A. Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed. They shut down the power, and when it did collapse, the things that they were concerned with would have been. That's about it.

1.11Controlled Demolition of the WTC?

For quite some time, I was convinced that the mechanism of the destruction of WTC 1 & 2 had to be similar to controlled demolition – it was the only thing that could account for the near free-fall time of “collapse”. However, I have since been enlightened through the results of Dr Wood’s study – the overall evidence does not support the idea that controlled demolition was the primary method of destruction of the towers. In examining the witness accounts, I found quite a few where the collapse was described as possibly like the sound of an approaching plane or rocket. For example, from the account of Faisel Abed (File No: 9110071):

You just heard this thrushing, thrushing noise like a rocket. I thought the building was under attack again. You just start seeing this smoke coming down. We just took off. We went north. We actually -- sorry, we went west. We went towards the river. All right. Then we just went towards the river and went up north a little bit behind the building. That was after the first one went down.

He describes a continuous noise rather than lots of explosions going off. Let us not confuse this part of the account with those accounts of earlier explosions before the towers came down, rather than as they were coming down. The repeated sequence of timed explosions heard during a controlled demolition is very distinctive and none of the witness accounts I studied described hearing this sort of sound as the towers collapsed.

1.12What Aren’t We Allowed to Know?

Patricia Ondrovic’s testimony, mentioned earlier, contains redacted portions and there were a number of other portions discovered in this research, and there are almost certainly others. Having used the file searching software, it would suggest there are redactions in at least 46 accounts. One can understand why certain parts of certain accounts may be obscured – perhaps so as not to cause upset to relatives of victims or where they might reveal certain small points of sensitive information. However, suspicions should be raised in the cases where significant portions of accounts were redacted, such as those of Rene Davila (over 10 pages in File No: 9110075) and Ronald Coyne (over 4 pages in File No: 9110395).

1.13Conclusions

On studying the accounts of the plane impacts, a confused picture appears. For the first plane, only one witness - William Walsh (File no: 9110442) specifically describes an American Airlines Plane. Other witnesses describe a whole variety of planes – some seen “out of the corner of their eye”. Some describe a military plane, some initially thought it was a small Cessna type plane. Of those witnesses who describe specifically seeing or hearing the planes, there are a number of instances where a curious turn of phrase is used at one or more points in the account. For example, the account of Thomas Fitzpatrick (File No: 9110001).

The noise from the plane was enough to make you not want to look up. I thought the plane was actually going to land in the street to be honest with you. The noise was outrageous. When it hit the building it was even worse.

Overall, I conclude the descriptions of planes given by the witnesses do not give one any more confidence than the video material, such as that presented in the September Clues series, that large planes hit the towers. With something as unique as 9/11, it was easy to “sell” people the plane stories in the midst of such a terrible tragedy.

There is a need for some witnesses to be questioned again about their experiences to determine the true nature of the crashes - and other anomalous events at the time of the WTC towers’ destruction. I hope that someday this is possible and that the true 9/11 perpetrators are brought to account for their heinous actions.

The data and full report on which this summary article is based on can be accessed using the links below:

Description

Size

PDF - Full Report In Compact PDF format

662 KB

PDF - Full Report PDF Format (With Internal Document Links)

4.8 MB



HTML - Full Report in HTML Format

1.7 MB



MS-Word Full Report In MS-Word Document Format

1 MB

Zipped MS-Word Full Report in Zipped Word Document Format

327 KB



Zip - Access and Excel Data Files used in Analysis in Zip format

345 KB



Text - All NY Times Accounts in Zipped Text Format

2.8 MB

by RuGBYZHG (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 13 comments) on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 9:30:44 PM
 


I am a chemist and able to contribute to the debate about thermite.
gravity32I am a chemist and able to contribute to the debate about thermite.

yeah

Yeah, and Uri Geller made a lot of money bending metal on stage.

by gravity32 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 146 comments) on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 7:20:49 PM
 


Tutor, Assessor, Software Developer UK 9/11 Campaigner
Andrew JohnsonTutor, Assessor, Software Developer UK 9/11 Campaigner

Yuri Geller - Do you know him?

Gravity32,

Do you know Mr Geller? Has John Alexander and a team from Los Alamos been to see him? It might be another interesting connection to make actually - I would research Geller's connection in all of this before making a joke of it (and, of course, he isn't even mentioned above, or on either of the 2 main websites, so your comment adds little or nothing to the search for the truth).

Do you have any comments about the specific points of evidence discussed and paralleled?

by Andrew Johnson (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 56 comments) on Friday, February 1, 2008 at 1:50:10 AM
 


Tutor, Assessor, Software Developer UK 9/11 Campaigner
Andrew JohnsonTutor, Assessor, Software Developer UK 9/11 Campaigner

Any points of evidence to discuss?

Got some better explanations, Mr Howard?

Come on - gives some explanations of the evidence, rather than "woo woo trains".

Why exactly is Dr Wood "leaving planet earth"? And why did you miss out my name! I'm upset about that! :-)

What's "woo woo" about John Alexander and LANL? Or did you not investigate those factors?

Hey ho...

by Andrew Johnson (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 56 comments) on Friday, February 1, 2008 at 10:53:43 AM
 


Attempting in a UK context to connect the world of 911 truth activism/false-flag terrorism awareness and the Voting integrity community, where I am seeking to alert the Electoral Reform Society to the dangers of the UK 'modernising' its voting mechanism, and awaken the peace movement to the 'Frats', Brotherhoods and 'Men's huts' which threaten our one Earth Motherland.
Keith MotherssonAttempting in a UK context to connect the world of 911 truth activism/false-flag terrorism awareness and the Voting integrity community, where I am seeking to alert the Electoral Reform Society to the dangers of the UK 'modernising' its voting mechanism, and awaken the peace movement to the 'Frats', Brotherhoods and 'Men's huts' which threaten our one Earth Motherland.

This is a real test for Op Ed news readers

Congratulations to Op Ed news for publishing this which now becomes a real test for each one of us.

As we read each sentence, are we able to read it calmly?, neither predisposed to give things credence which perhaps haven't been proved well enough, nor aversively inclined to scoff at things which have been proved just fine (or shown to be likely), but which upset our normal assumptions that either 'Our government wouldn't do this' - or more likely at this site: 'I already know about Sept 11 and what happened about the planes 'stand-down' and the 'building collapses' caused by thermite etc.

Judy Wood is stretching us all, but let us try to all stay focussed on reason and evidence in the service of truth, not HER being Right, or 'Wrong', and so will those of us inclined to scoff at a woman speaking out of turn, or at 'weird X-files stuff' please go meditate and then return to check out her and Reynold's and Johnson's evidence with some humility before posting their reasons for disagreeing (if they still have them).

[one area for tightening up on is the exact dating and locating of post-destruction photos: for example if we have come to believe that these twin tower buildings nearly all fell UPWARDS (as dust vented upwards in a fountain like a firework or volcano) it won't do to present undated photos of the large plaza covered in dust to 'prove' that there was little debris left at the bottom of the twin towers. But that is meant as friendly criticism, I know how hard researchers are working, and how hard Giuliani and co tried to control unauthorised access and photography from day one.]

Of course it is fine for folk to be not sure, or only x percent sure so far. But on a matter of such pivotal importance, this shouldn't be a cover for ignoring truth, and preferring not to examine evidence. We all have an obligation to try to find out, lest we unintentionally give legs to a racist war-mongering psy-op which has led to unimaginable suffering.

On the other hand, if we could unite for 9/11 truth, many of us think that that would do more than anything else to help wake people out of the corporate ruling group mindset which John McMurty writes about so brilliantly in Jim Fetzer (ed) The 911 Conspiracy: the scamming of America, which to my mind is the best book on 911 so far (though Webster Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in America isn't far behind). In other words, that 911 truth breakthrough could give the biggest value-added boost to all the other struggles for peace, environment, justice, freedom, etc. Especially it would put MSM media on the spot as actively participant in the scam from day one, or in the cover up from day two or week two. (so we have to BE the Media, and help build sites like Op Ed News).

And another huge value-added boost would come if we realised that powerful energy sources have been developed in secret (able to dustify huge buildings in a few seconds), and what other new alternative energy sources based on Tesla physics or water or etc may have been suppressed for the last few decades in the interests of Big Oil? - just as Hemp, a key to bioregional self-sufficiency, was suppressed by Du Pont, Hearst empire, etc in the late 30's.

One thing is for certain: A free equal society (true motherland) depends on us all growing up/being renewed ('born again') and learning to tolerate uncertainty and facts which don't seem to 'fit' with past assumptions, and above all it depends on our learning not to be swayed by ignorant loudmouth frat-style jeering.

by Keith Mothersson (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 31 comments) on Friday, February 1, 2008 at 7:16:52 AM