Not even twenty four hours passed before reports of fraud surfaced in New Hampshire, it began in the town of Sutton. Initially the reports released said that no one voted for Ron Paul in that town, but a woman claiming to be from Sutton commented online that she and her family all voted for Ron Paul in Sutton. That was enough for Bev Harris of Blackboxvoting.org to jump into action, she contacted the Town Clerk for Sutton and Jennifer Call confirmed the fraud. The zero tally was in fact a mistake, and Ron Paul actually received 31 votes. They omitted eight percent of the votes in that town, and called it an accident...whoops sorry.. and the main stream media quietly updated their charts never reporting the story. But this cannot be glossed over as a "human error," this is fraud and Bev Harris highlights how deceitful it really is, "...one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results." So far nothing has been updated for the town of Greenville. The Boston Globe reports 139 voters, and CNN reports 144 votes, both are reporting zero votes for Ron Paul, but the Nashua Telegraph is reporting a very different story in Greenville tallying 290 votes they report 25 votes for Ron Paul. In Greenville they usedelectronic "vote flipping" machinesso perhaps not another human error, but possible malicious intent. Out of the 17 towns that originally reported no votes for Ron Paul, two have been changed, but how many more towns have erased our votes, or updated their numbers without anyone noticing? We must find out. It is illegal and whoops is not an acceptable answer, after the 2004 elections, Ohio was under the microscope and people were convicted of illegally rigging the 2004 recount. These types of "careless mistakes" are likely to follow Ron Paul throughout the primaries. Our fair electionsare filled with fraud and we know it, to ignore it would not be revolutionary. Ron Paul has done best when his supporters step up and lead the campaign, today the message from his supporters is for Ron Paul to demand an official recount. We are willing to be activists, we have given our time and money and now we need a leader to attack this injustice properly.
The only thing to blame for Ron Paul supporters is THEMSELVES, their CANDIDATE, and the positions of their CANDIDATE that do not resonate, make sense or attract the vast majority of Americans, especially those that really want political change.
by
Joel S. Hirschhorn (126 articles, 31 quicklinks, 58 diaries, 508 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 8:44:02 AM
Does that mean people who voted for Ron Paul shouldn't have their votes counted? Losing a fair fight is fine; not counting every vote, no matter who it's for, is wrong and votes weren't counted.
by
Susan Moody (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 12 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 9:19:18 AM
What was the point of that? We are talking about election fraud here. Please stick to topic and stop showing your ignorance. If Ron Paul's message doesn't make sense to you then you must either be dim-witted or ignorant of his actual positions. I think you meant to say that you disagree with his message which is fine though that automatically puts you in opposition to the ideas of the Founders and our Constitution. Stop giving lip-service to the idea of change because we both know that the rest of the Republicans represent the status-quo as do most of the Democrats.
by
Alexander Perros (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 10:23:00 AM
I appreciate your posting the link to Grannie Warriors, last I saw, they had over $7K and hired one person who is on a jet to NH to take on a recount now. But then we have the matter of the FEC not having enough seats to operate this year (so far) due to partisian bickering.
by
Jeanette Doney (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 304 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 6:51:34 PM
This shows just how worried the corporate-elite are of the Ron Paul campaign. They have tried everything else; now they have taken to vote rigging in N.H. I fear for this great man's safety. When the elite that control our country, central-bankers (Federal Reserve) feel they are losing control, they will stop at nothing. I pray for his safety every day.
by
ronheri (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 149 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 4:51:21 PM
By zooamerica | January 9, 2008
This would have placed Dr. Paul in 3rd place, just as the polls were
showing before the primary.
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643 The computer counted votes are the problem.
Not a single hand count township showed less than 10%
Supposedly, Ron Paul got 8% - this does not make sense.
richmond is hand count 34% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
lyman is hand count 28.7% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
Orange is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
Harts location is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
wentworth is hand count 24% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
goshen is hand count 17.68% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
marlow is hand count 16.6% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
cornish is hand count 14.8% for dr. Paul.100% reporting
Rumney is hand count 14.5% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
croydon is hand count 14 % for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
dorchester is hand count 13.89% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
effingham is hand count 13% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
albany is hand count 12.9% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
antrim is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
south hampton is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
sullivan is hand count 12.61% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
troy is hand count 12.21% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
mason is hand count 11.88% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
newport is hand count 11.45% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
charlstown is hand count 11.3% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
Allenstown is hand count 11.16% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
bristol is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
warren is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
Strafford is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
washington is hand count 11.02% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
lancaster is hand count 10.9% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
springfield is hand count 10.6% for Dr.Paul.100% reporting
wilton is hand count 10.37% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
Northfield is hand count 10.3% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
mont vernon is hand count 10.25% for Dr. Paul.100% reporting
by
Carson Dugal (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 19 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 5:16:27 PM
Unfortunately Mr. Hirschorn makes verifably idiotic statements. you noticed that I didn't say that he was verfiably idiotic but only his statements,.... so I lied.
by
Archie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1128 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 9:42:17 PM
12 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
