Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 10   Must Read 8   Well Said 8   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 6/11/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (36 comments)

Will Obama and the Supply-siders Inadvertently Drag Us Into Another Great Depression?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (95 fans)   -- Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

 Even as another potential Great Depression looms, the US political/media system seems incapable of honestly addressing the crisis and devising coherent answers.   Instead, the old partisan and lobbying games dominate the political world, and obsession with trivia commands the news media's limited focus, Danny Schechter writes.

.

Some years back, Thomas Frank nailed it in his book, The Wrecking Crew.   It was subtitled "How Conservatives Rule" and it showed how narrow self-interest and well-practiced cynicism in the service of partisan warfare has crippled our political system, resulting in a deep paralysis despite the looming threat of a collapse.

What it really is, Danny says, is sabotage, a tactic that involves deliberate effort to insure that reforms are effectively undermined.   Today, the hatchets are out to do-in the needed financial reforms contained in a bill that has already been neutered and nit-picked, trimmed, sliced and diced by what's called "legislative compromise.'

And now a congressional-style Seal Team Six has been assembled by the Republicans and is ready to pounce on the new enemy of the politically powerful banksters:   financial reform.   (There is no corporate privilege or malevolent bank practice that bankster lobbyists will not defend . . in the name of fostering financial growth.)

One juicy sex scandal involving one or more pols gets more ink than all the investigations of how special interests, well-paid lobbyists, billionaire funders, think-tank gunslingers and slippery lawyers for hire serve to stop even mild reforms that might cost the industries they work for money or influence.   There are no reforms they won't endlessly amend into oblivion.

Here's how it works

First, they commission bogus and selective studies to "prove" why reforms need to be "reformed," their way.   Then, with PR and complicit corporate media, they orchestrate coverage to sell their policies.   They start with something small like protections for debit cards, and then escalate to full-scale warfare.

Escalation example:   the knives were out for the new Consumer Protection Bureau with a major campaign targeting Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Warren, who first proposed the agency and was widely considered the most qualified to lead it.

She was then demonized by the industry and the Right -- and now the Obama administration seems ready to abandon her, rather than fight for her.   But we need her.   Why?   Because four years ago, the markets melted down, sparking a global crisis.   The bailouts followed and a trillion-dollar bank-led "recovery" helped many banks recover.   However, unemployment and foreclosures stayed high.   Very high.   And economic growth seized up.   The crisis continues.   And Elizabeth Warren understands the implications of all this for the average American, and she is our advocate.

So what was Obama's response?

He allowed his administration to be locked into an alliance with Wall Street.   This alliance then killed proposals for structural reform and restraints on private economic power.   And now the Obama administration is foolishly expecting an economic turnaround -- their version of faith-based politics -- even as jobs are not coming back.

In short, the Obama administration has no answers and is not prepared to fight any messy battles with the real power structure in this country, which consists of Wall Street and the big corporations.   In the name of pragmatism, Obama has betrayed his own campaign compromises and tacked right, drifting ever closer to the Republicans.

They call it "triangulation."   Their critics call it a sell-out.   The Republicans retreated into knee-jerk simple-mindedness, blaming everything on Democrats and government spending.   Then they began fueling a scare about "The Deficit" in the same way that their predecessors raved against "The Red Menace."

In Congress, supposedly wise men came up with a financial reform called Dodd-Frank.   After stripping it of anything remotely radical, they offered up some pragmatic measures to increase regulation and try to force the finance industry to act responsibly with more transparency and accountability.    However, the bill explicitly rejected proposals for any and all international standards and is essentially an empty suit.

Dodd-Frank passed, but then the real bargaining began on what the new rules should actually be.   The finance industry mounted a lobbying force consisting of 25 high-powered lawyers and consultants for each and every member of Congress.   The deliberations moved out of public view and into the corridors and closed clubs in Washington.   The predictable result has now surfaced in the New York Times:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://www.TechEditingServices.com

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've always (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Can Liz Warren help? So why are banksters against her? by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:20:54 PM
Gouging consumers IS profitable, as is tanking the economy. by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:09:40 AM
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF A WOMAN by Linda Laurin on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:19:18 PM
supply-side economics by Paul Craig Roberts on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:26:50 PM
Supply-side is not a policy of Obama? Nor of Bush's? by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:39:45 PM
Supply-side economics according to Wikipedia by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:28:15 PM
Paul Craig Roberts was in the Reagan administration Treasury by bogi666 on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:59:09 AM
Yes But It's Not Inadvertent by Carol Davidek-Waller on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:31:58 PM
Inadvertent = Intentional by Michael Rose on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:57:57 AM
Elizabeth Warren by Dwight Boness on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:41:37 PM
Obama's Part In This by Jillian Barclay on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:15:27 PM
An Alternative to Capitalism (which we need here in the USA) by John Steinsvold on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:38:18 PM
Republican sabotage? And could it be called treason? by Richard Clark on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:22:35 PM
But it has worked. by Oscar Schneider on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:36:48 PM
30 years of supply side Reaganomic policies by bogi666 on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:37:11 AM
"Deficit spending could put the unemployed to work" by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:53:47 AM
This is a fantasy by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:14:40 AM
WTF? by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:47:25 AM
Some more detail: by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:03:01 AM
Sort of but not exactly by AAA AAA on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:30:27 AM
Protectionism = economic suicide by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:59:33 PM
Not sure which era you are speaking of... by AAA AAA on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:35:18 PM
Free market or pro business? by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:07:02 PM
Wrong again by AAA AAA on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:04:40 AM
Agreement on the US by Darren Wolfe on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:26:55 AM
Inadvertent? by AAA AAA on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:03:12 AM
If the President Won't Do Something About Jobs, Who Will? by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:53:38 AM
Obama should be primaried by Oscar Schneider on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:32:54 PM
Treason by the GOP puts them in the White House in 2012 by Oscar Schneider on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:43:52 PM
Obama's transformation from supply-sider to demand-sider? by Richard Clark on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:09:52 PM
W'dya Mean "Dragged Down" by David Chester on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:43:15 AM
But taxing land is highly regressive, at least until we... by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:02:17 PM
Global corporate world by Philip Pease on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:55:07 AM
We know what has to be done, the question is... by Silverpegasus on Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:37:32 AM
Larry Summers joins the double-dip doomsters by Richard Clark on Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:37:56 AM
Obama's Misery Index may defeat him in 2012 by Richard Clark on Thursday, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:22:20 PM