OpEdNews Op Eds

Why the New Security Zone along the Canadian Border?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/3/11

Become a Fan
  (117 fans)
- Advertisement -

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just issued an environmental report on its enhanced security plan to cover an area extending from the East Coast to the West Coast, from the northern border of the United States to 100 miles south of the border. While there are few specifics on the new security measures, the environmental report offers enough to see how we will be protected against threats to national security coming from Canada. The Department of Homeland security will enhance efforts and technologies to reduce the danger from "known terrorist affiliates and extremist groups [that] have an undisputed presence along the Northern Border in both the United States and Canada." Northern Border Security Programs, p. 1-3, September 2011 (Northern Border) (Image: thelastminute)

In 2006 the American Civil Liberties Union exposed the expansion of border control activities to within 100 miles of any point on the U.S. border. ACLU labeled this area the Constitution Free Zone. Search and seizure options at border checkpoints are not constrained by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Now, thanks to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), just because they're within 100 miles of the nearest border nearly 200 million citizens are subject to searching and procedures that previously were used exclusively at border checkpoints.

What do they have in store for citizens on the northern border?

Some highlights of the program include: checkpoints far from the border (but within the 100-mile limit); increased patrol activity; remote video surveillance system systems; upgraded surveillance and telecommunications systems; high-powered X-ray machines of various kinds; and fencing or vehicle barriers at selected points along the border.

The new and improved "High-Energy X-Ray Imaging Scanners" (Northern Border, p. 2-12) expand national security radiation exposure from airline passengers to the much broader audience of drivers and their families, for example, who choose to visit and return from Canada, as well as those who choose to visit the United States from Canada, and anyone unlucky enough to drive into a checkpoint in the Constitution Free Zone.

Buried within the report was this findings, DHS asserts that even though "exposure to high levels of radiation would increase a person's probability of developing cancer and hereditary genetic damage," (Northern Border, 8-13-10, p. 201), the impacts of this program will be "negligible." One wonders if their analysis has considered the kids sitting in the back seat of the car, protected by nothing more than that back seat and their clothing, while a CBP agents X-rays the car's trunk with a mobile device. It's hard to feel warm and fuzzy about impacts being negligible when you can't see any analysis to support that assertion.

- Advertisement -

With the expanded territory and array of new technologies, one can argue that the security measures represent a militarization of the Canadian border. The following illustration from the environmental report makes that point:

Northern Report, 1-6

The possibilities for a one-sided encounter with those who claim to protect us are endless. You may be driving to visit a friend in a car once owned by someone one on the Automated Targeting System (ATS), "a security and tracking program for cargo that DHS has extended to travelers by assigning all who cross the nation's borders with a computer-generated risk assessment score that will be retained for 40 years -- and which is secret and unreviewable." A Homeland Security drone spots you and relays the message to the Customs and Border Protection command center. That alert sends a message to the "mobile data terminal" in a Border Patrol "agent vehicle" and it's game on. You're pulled over. Good luck explaining why you're in a "dirty car."

O Canada!

"CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) is the largest law enforcement component of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It has a priority mission of keeping terrorists and their weapons out of the United States." Introduction, p. 4

An enhanced security zone along the longest peaceful border in the world should raise suspicion. As Paul Craig Roberts has pointed out, there have been no successful terrorist attacks on the United States since 9/11, at least none conducted by foreign governments (arguably, the response to Hurricane Katrina can be seen as a de facto terror attack on the people of New Orleans). There were two cross-border threats intercepted in December, 1999 through the efforts of Customs and Border Protection agents and others at the Canadian border in Vermont and Washington state. But that was with the systems and technologies of that time.

Has Canada suddenly become a hotbed of virulent anti-American activity? Are the Mounties and other law enforcement agencies in Canada turning a blind eye to known threats? Are we expected to believe that the nation that turned down a featured role in the coalition of the willing has suddenly become lax on enforcing international law?

Keeping them out or us in? (Or is it all about the money?)

Is there another motive behind the seeming militarization of the Canadian border

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3



The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

...this is evil in the flesh. All those insider fa... by msedano on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:08:03 AM
Tried to convince those in Quebec, the French, to ... by Michael Collins on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:30:09 PM
As I said - jobs.  However people without ste... by Jane Schiff on Tuesday, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:47:46 AM
Paranoia is the new economy, the new order, the ne... by Ned Lud on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:51:04 AM
the part about being shot dead.  But look at ... by Michael Collins on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:33:33 PM
Tedious is a very good choice of words, Michael. ... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:29:37 AM
Police State 1, ACLU 0 [[ASCLU]] ... by . . on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:13:36 PM
All the border stuff is definitely unnecessary as ... by lwarman on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:19:20 PM
MONEY CHANGERS are feeding the peaceful Christian... by . . on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 2:27:07 PM
That's a great, though now dated, poster of Uncle ... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:35:10 AM
Aren't we all!... by Michael Collins on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:39:17 PM
Hi Michael,Seriously?  I've heard some people... by Jane Schiff on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:25:47 PM
I love Samantha Bee but I'll bet she's seen as a m... by Michael Collins on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:40:51 PM
A whole bunch of undeserving people have a chance ... by Carol Davidek-Waller on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:41:46 PM
They need to scare us.  Otherwise, lots of pe... by Michael Collins on Monday, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:44:16 PM
This rates pretty high on the Bizarreness Scale.&n... by Kathleen O'Grady on Tuesday, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:43:19 AM
It's more about keeping us in than on keeping othe... by Judy Palmer on Tuesday, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:40:36 PM
First, they killed 90% of the Indians and put the ... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:21:08 AM
As mentioned here, the fence may be meant more to ... by Paul Repstock on Tuesday, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:50:22 AM