Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Whose War, What War?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (78 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Reports out of the United Kingdom say that President Obama will acquiesce to General McChyrstal's request and add 45,000 more troops to Afghanistan. The official announcement is to be made before next week's NATO meeting.

The long delay has been seen by conservatives as an opportunity to call the President a weak, lazy, Nigerian-born Marxist, Communist, Socialist, hell bent on destroying America. When actually it has been a delay by the White House to make the President look thoughtful and contemplative before charging full bore into a continuation of the Bush/Cheney foreign policy.

Japan has dropped out of the Afghan mission, minor though it was, but the message is clear, continue this folly on your own! This war was started in Afghanistan because the Taliban government refused to extradite Osama Bin Laden to the United States. The Taliban first claimed that because there was no formal extradition treaty that they were under no obligation. Then they claimed that they didn't know where Bin Laden was or if he was still even in Afghanistan. The first charge was specious but the second charge now eight years later seems to hold some validity.

So what are our goals? What do we win? How do we know that we are winning? During WWII Americans could watch on the map as allied forces pushed the axis forces back towards their borders. The public tolerated terrible losses because they could see that progress was being made. Today if you ask what our goals are in Afghanistan, and the answer might be returned, "We are bringing democracy." The recent elections and the nature of Afghan society make that old saw as thin as a cotton shirt on a cold night.

So I began to read the press from other nations and the further I got from the United States the more the perception of our occupation of Afghanistan mutated. From the Asia Times,

"KUNDUZ - The vehicle is marked Kunduz Provincial Police Headquarters, but the occupants are not necessarily servants of the state.


"The Taliban in Kunduz recently captured eight police Ford Ranger pickups in Chahr Dara district, and they use them to move around.

"The Taliban have complete control over the district. They have established their own brand of Islamic rule, and they can move around the villages and bazaars openly, with no fear. There is no government authority here. We have control only over the governor's office,' said Abdul Wahid, the district governor of Chahr Dara. 'Outside these walls we have no jurisdiction at all. People do not come to the governor's office to solve their problems -- they go to the Taliban.'"

This after eight years and billions of dollars spent in the US occupation of Afghanistan.

"Kunduz province only a year ago was considered stable with business booming and residents hopeful."

Four other districts are in the same situation as Kunduz. The local officials cash their checks and drive their new trucks until the Taliban take them away, and when the going gets tough the officials run.

After eight years the Afghan army is still unable to protect the people from the Taliban. In the Philippines during WWII, the Filipino resistance movement was the scourge of the Japanese occupation. With no outside support using mainly captured weapons they tied down thousands of Japanese troops. This movement formed in less than two years. A coast watcher with a radio and a 45-caliber pistol ended the war, in charge of over 140 men with two captured patrol boats and an armored barge. The difference was in motivation; the Filipinos wanted the Japanese gone.

The Governor of Kunduz blames Pakistan, saying that as long as NATO supplies were being routed through Pakistan the local Pakistanis were profiting from taxes and fees. But since the attack on the NATO supply routes NATO has rerouted the supplies through Tajikistan, leaving the locals in the area with a financial void to fill. So if the locals have nothing to gain perhaps destabilizing that area of the country might bring NATO supplies back to the area.

"Lieutenant-Colonel Carsten Spiering, spokesman for the German Provincial Reconstruction Team in Kunduz, did not dismiss the notion that the change of supply routes might account for some of the unrest in the province.

"Kunduz police chief Mohammad Razaq Yaqubi, however, links the security problems to smugglers of narcotics in Kunduz. 'The Taliban try to increase cultivation and production of opium in this region,' he said. 'This war in Kunduz belongs to the narcotics mafia, which is operating in the name of Islam.'

"Yaqubi called on the international forces to do battle with the smugglers. 'They need to fight against them,' he insisted. 'Al-Qaeda gets a lot of its income from drugs and buys military equipment with it.'"

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I who am I? Born at the pinnacle of American prosperity to parents raised during the last great depression. I was the youngest child of the youngest children born almost between the generations and that in fact clouds and obscures who it is that I (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Soldiers equals Jobs by Allan Wayne on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:58:23 AM
It's the oil, stupid by Nick van Nes on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:36:01 AM
I agree by David Glenn Cox on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:39:18 PM