Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Who do they think they are?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 12/20/09
Become a Fan
  (103 fans)

opednews.com

Imagine that a neighbor of yours (good guy) decides one day that another neighbor (bad guy) might assault him and damage his home. Then imagine that good guy hires professional hitmen to attack and kill bad guy. Just to be thorough, good guy hires a helicopter with sniper to hover over bad guy's house and shoot a grenade at him the minute he emerges regardless of who is with him. What do you think of good guy?

In asking, who do they think they are, I'm referring to those leaders who retain the notion that the following actions are somehow in the realm of rational and actionable behavior by the United States:

I'm sending troops.

As president, you have the unparalleled military power at your disposal. You decide to send troops a few thousand thousands of miles away without any imminent threat to the nation. The lives of the troops are at risk. Their families face an irreplaceable loss. They will kill and injure others whose families will suffer major losses. It will be horrible.

The White House has authorized an expansion of the C.I.A.'s drone program in [insert foreign country].

This is a variation of sending troops. It's a bit stranger though. The White House is a surrogate for the president sending killer aircraft to roam around a nation and fire missiles at presumed bad guys below. The mechanical death machines can't discriminate enough to avoid killing civilians. Therefore, the death-from-above mission means, in essence, expanding the use of drones to kill both bad guys and, inevitably, innocent people that the president has decided need to die as well in order for the targeting mission to succeed.

The options of virtual empire and overwhelming strength can and do translate into propositions that by everyday standards are either immoral or highly deviant. Simply because a president can do this and is able to get away with it due to the warped dialectic of power does not absolve those who make these decisions from an objective judgment of the simple facts: it's ghoulish, immoral, and deviant behavior.

END

This article may be reproduced in part or in whole with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author3863.html

Researcher, writer DC Area Attack on Syria - Struggle for Turkey - Attack on Libya - The Money Party = Survival - End Times - Obama Administration - Politics and Policy - Election fraud - Pennsylvania Sexual Abuse Scandal - (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

The Pennsylvania Sexual Assault Scandal, the Second Mile Foundation, and Penn State

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments