Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

What the McCain-Obama "Debates" Should Have Been Like

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/24/08

Become a Fan
  (65 fans)
The third party debate sponsored by the Free and Equal Elections group just finished airing on C-SPAN2. While it only included Ralph Nader and Chuck Baldwin, two of the six presidential candidates on enough ballot lines to win in a free and fair election, the third party debate showed what the debates between McCain and Obama could have been like.

Ralph Nader, the Independent presidential candidate, and Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate, went back and forth talking about the issues never letting the discussion devolve into one aimed at the lowest common denominator.

The candidates never shirked from addressing ever pressing issues like the bailout, foreign policy in the Middle East, the Constitution, and the role of corporations in America.

The moderator was Chris Hedges, who, unlike Jim Lehrer, Gwen Ifill, Tom Brokaw, or Bob Schieffer, never backed off when posing questions. His question were often three and four part questions with complexities that will never be seen in a debate sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD). 

The format for the debate was one the CPD should adopt. According to Free and Equal:

-No opening statements
-There will be six of the following question and answer series: The
moderator will pose a question. Each candidate will be permitted 90
seconds to respond. The candidates' preliminary answers will be followed
by a 5-minute "discussion" period, during which the moderator will be
permitted unlimited follow-up questions and the candidates would be
encouraged to engage one another in actual debate. This will last about
60 minutes.

-After the above six question-and-answer series, each candidate will be
permitted to ask a single question of one or more of the other
candidates, with each candidate permitted 90 seconds to respond. This
will last about 10 minutes.
-After this, submitted questions from the audience will be selected and
presented by the moderator. This will last for about 10 minutes.
-Each candidate will be permitted a 2-minute closing statement. 

“Rate the Debates” analyses posted on Free Press show that Americans wanted something more than three parallel interviews.

The analyses show Americans wanted more wide ranging discussion in the first debate on the economy, Americans wanted Tom Brokaw to fact-check the candidates and challenge their spin in the second debate, and in the third debate Americans still wanted the moderator, Bob Schieffer, to challenge the candidates more.

The Free and Equal debate set a standard to be followed, however, it had a serious deficiency.

Just watch this video from McKinney explaining why she wanted to be there.

[MCK1] 

I noticed it. Despite the fact that Hedges did what every debate moderator should do, he had, prior to this debate, “endorsed” Nader. McKinney is right that his might as well be called “The Nader Debate.”

 

The video from McKinney shows the schism among progressives turning to third parties which has developed and how Nader has created two opposing groups, Green and Naderites.

Whatever good intentions the Nader/Gonzalez campaign may have had, the Barr campaign is right to bring up the fact that they publicly announced this debate without checking candidate availability. Barr was apparently at Georgia Tech and could not get out of it. 

Whether this is true or not does not matter. The campaign is throwing this together after ThirdPartyTicket.com’s attempts at a debate failed and it really should not have happened without all four candidates.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

in the short clip above, then good for her. I woul... by Nick van Nes on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:50:42 AM
it would appear that the McKinney campaign was tol... by Jack Harrington on Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:29:10 PM
The two party system sets the rules for the debate... by ronheri on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:02:33 PM