Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (4 comments)

What does 'internal affair' really mean?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

It is not only disappointing but a shocking experience that China and Russia vetoed again to block the UN resolution against Zimbabwe's Mugabe regime. It is unbelievable how China and Russia could turn a blind eye to the atrocities and block the UN action which could bring significant changes in Zimbabwe's conflict. China and Russia started enjoying their vetoes since Burma's issue was raised at the UN Security Council led by the US and UK in early 2007. They always claim that it is "internal affairs" but what does that mean in fact?

Not only the UN itself but the international community has the responsibility for global justice, freedom and prosperity of the underprivileged countries, and the affluent states have the right to promote freedom, rights and democracy of other countries where it needs to be promoted. It cannot be claimed that the countries working for the betterment of global society are interfering. And the United Nations itself has the right to intervene in situations like in Zimbabwe and Burma. The real interference is blocking the welfare of general population or majority of the people in a country where rights and freedom is extinct.

When a country is facing a significant challenge of humanitarian disasters, the international community has to intervene to resolve the conflicts rather than doing nothing and calling it an "internal affair." Is it the right thing to do to let people die from natural disasters such as Cyclone Nargis in Burma or man-made disasters such as extra-judicial killings, arbitrary detentions and "mass intimidation'" against people who speak for justice, freedom and equality of prosperity? If you look at the recent events in Zimbabwe and Burma, the authoritarian regimes and their militias violently cracked down on the opposition and controlled power undemocratically and illegitimately. Although the UN actions are initiated, the powerful "vetoes" have been overriding the process of resolving political stalemates in Burma and Zimbabwe. If the United Nations could not address these conflicts, then the world powers such as United States and United Kingdom will surely tighten the measures against these brutal regimes of Zimbabwe and Burma.

Then the circle of sanctions and the process of resolving "internal affairs" would take ages and people would continue living in these deteriorating circumstances without hope for freedom and prosperity. It is the time for the global society to unite and work together for the global prosperity. The world should no longer be divided as North and South and the world powers should realize that the Cold War era was over decades ago. Crucially the term "internal affair" should not be coined when the incidents of oppression, injustice and inhumanity occurred in a society. The world should not afford to ignore the atrocities as "internal affair." When the freedom and prosperity of people are not allowed to flourish, atrocities have the opportunity to grow up. It is absolutely interfering in the process of development and democracy in a country.

 

Zaw Nay Aung is director of London-based human rights advocacy and think tank, Burma Independence Advocates.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Internal Affairs by Ty on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 7:17:25 PM
Mugabe is no dictator by brian on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:00:54 AM
Affluent states by Ty on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 7:28:10 PM
Shame on you Aung by brian on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:58:56 PM