Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Vote of No Confidence in E-Voting Merger: Talking with Democracy Warrior Nancy Tobi

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/30/09

Become a Fan
  (83 fans)
- Advertisement -
A few days before Labor Day weekend, rumors started circulating about proposed changes in the field of electronic voting machine vendors. Premier Election Solutions, formerly known as Diebold [Diebold Election Systems, Inc.], was shutting down, being bought out, or somehow going out of existence. Some of those rumors have turned out to be true. I have with me Democracy Warrior, Nancy Tobi.

I know you've heard about ES&S's recent acquisition of Premier/Diebold, Nancy. Diebold was the electronic voting machine corporation concerned voters loved to hate, but its problems were shared by all electronic voting systems. Is it premature, or inappropriate, to be celebrating?

There's nothing to celebrate here. Diebold is not going out of existence. It is morphing and becoming stronger and more dangerous. The ES&S-Diebold merger shines a big old spotlight on an inconvenient truth: In America, our elections are controlled by private interests that count our votes in secret and then expect us to believe them when they tell us the election results they've cooked up for us.

The fact is that, with or without this merger, in America today more than 90% of our elections are run and controlled by private corporations.

In other words, more than 90% of our elections are no longer free, open and public elections.

Once I spoke to a Secretary of State from the Midwest, who told me of a longstanding state law that said if, for any reason, public election officials did not show up, citizens were authorized to hold the elections themselves. This law ensured the continuation of our democracy and the constitutional mandate for governance under the consent of the governed. Unfortunately, the law was being repealed because ordinary citizens can no longer run their own elections; the computerized systems are too complex for ordinary citizens to be able to use without the "assistance" of corporate employees.

I should mention, too, that usually those corporate employees are completely anonymous. They come in in the middle of an election, make changes to the voting hardware and software, and nobody even knows who they are, never mind what changes they are actually making.

I filed a public records request asking the New Hampshire Secretary of State for the names of all private employees who "serviced" faulty or defective election equipment and software during our last general election in 2008. I was provided with an email from the Diebold vendor stating that he simply did not want to provide the names of his employees. And that was that. Apparently it was completely okay with the NH Secretary of State to allow anonymous people to intervene in our elections with no public oversight. Common sense tells us this is ridiculous.

The law backs us up. Our privatized system of elections is wholly illegal in and of itself. Concealed vote counting is illegal. Privatizing essential governmental functions is illegal. On and on it goes.
- Advertisement -


The antitrust nature of the proposed Diebold-ES&S merger is one of many items on a virtual Chinese menu of legal and constitutional violations in our current system of privatized elections.

The Office of Management and Budget in 1999 released its legally binding interpretation of statute in a memo called "A-76 Transmittal Memorandum #20" regarding what is and what is not a "non-delegable" governmental function.

The OMB states: "It is the policy of the United States Government to....retain Governmental Functions In-House. Certain functions are inherently Governmental in nature, being so intimately related to the public interest as to mandate performance only by...Government employees."

The OMB memo goes on to define what falls under these non-delegable governmental functions:

"The act of governing; i.e., the discretionary exercise of Government authority."
- Advertisement -


I can't think of anything more clearly falling under this definition than our elections, which are the ultimate insurance for maintaining the act of governing.

I applaud Bev Harris, of Black Box Voting, for filing an antitrust complaint against this proposed ES&S-Diebold merger. Even with the Chinese menu we have at hand, it's been impossible to find dedicated public servants or legal experts to help challenge our illegal privatized elections. So Black Box Voting has plucked one item off the menu, and they have a strong case.

The antitrust complaint points out that this merger would give a single corporation the power to effectively shut down our elections. I would add to this, that a single corporation would control our election results, counting our votes in secret, with no public oversight.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.opednews.com/author/author79.html

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers