Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 7 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (14 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   43 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

This Is What Conspiracy Really Looks Like

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 8   Valuable 6   Must Read 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 12/3/11

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)
- Advertisement -

Social System by Lincoln Stoller


Here's an interesting piece from Felix Salmon on what really went on in Hank Paulson's treasury in 2008, and it's taken 3 years to become public knowledge in spite of there being no institutionally orchestrated wall of silence to keep it from the public eye. This is what government conspiracy really is, and it's not "conspiracy" per se, it's collusion on various scales carried out in an ununified manner. Nevertheless, it looks the same and comes to the same end as a "real" conspiracy. Please read "Hank Paulson's inside jobs" at:
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/11/29/hank-paulsons-inside-jobs/

Here Salmon says:

"What on earth did Hank Paulson think his job was in the summer of 2008? As far as most of us were concerned, he was secretary of the US Treasury, answerable to the US people and to the president. But at the same time, in secret meetings, Paulson was hanging out with his old Goldman Sachs buddies, giving them invaluable information about what he was thinking in his new job.

"The first news of this behavior came in October 2009, when Andrew Ross Sorkin revealed that Paulson had met with the entire board of Goldman Sachs in a Moscow hotel suite for an hour at the end of June 2008. He told them his views of the US and global economies, he previewed a market-moving speech he was about to give, and he even talked about the possibility that Lehman Brothers might blow up. Maybe it's not so surprising that Goldman Sachs turned out to be so well positioned when Lehman did indeed do just that a few months later."

My point is that what outsiders view as conspiracy is, in most cases, simply profitable information being passed between collaborators for the purposes of private gain, tighter cooperation, and more monopolistic organization. These events don't need to be done with a master plan in mind, they simply leverage jointly valued opportunity that generates a narrower, more focused collusive network. This is how the network grows.
- Advertisement -


At some point in the future these networks might be taken over by a singular power with an over arching plan, but even without that kind of top-level heirarchy they still operate to the common advantage of the participants who share a de facto common goal. They don't need a "master plan for world domination" because the system in which they operate already offers them ever increasing power by operating within the existing "winner takes all" model of international corporatism and weakly regulated government collaboration

Orchestrating a coordinated operation that involves careful timing and invented stories, such as the World Trade Center attack, does involve a conspiracy of the more conventional sort, although in the context of certain institutions, such as rogue states, the Pentagon and the Executive Branch, close coordination of that sort is already in place.

What people need to understand is that for a collection of interests to develop unified operations outside of public view does not require any singular authority or master plan. These segregated networks develop organically and will conduct exclusive operations consistent with the internal organization on which they're built. Our system rewards them for doing so.

In this case traditional Wall Street collusion between a mega-brokerage and its politically connected inner-circle, which includes academics, industry organizations, corporations, think tanks, hedge funds, politicians and private clients, simply persisted after this confederacy infected itself or was admitted into higher levels of government. From this point the inclusion of other closely connected organizations -- like Rockerfeller, Rothchild, Bildeberg, the Chinese or whatever groups -- is a foregone conclusion. Once these other groups gain access to the levers of power through this "inner circle" mechanism, then each of these groups will struggle to dominate, working in public institutions but outside of the public view, for the purposes of furthering their own agendas.

This is the nature of our system which has private corporations buying influence in systems that are supposed to be democratic. This cannot be changed by singling out specific groups or erecting single-issue fire walls. This is not the result of a few rotten apples. It is the fungus of international corporate capitalism operating in the "fruit salad" of selectively democratic republics.
- Advertisement -

 

http://www.tengerresearch.com

Physicist, neurologist, neurofeedback practitioner, junior sorcerer, enthusiastic participant in extreme explorations involving mind and body. Believer in the idea that individuals find meaning in bettering and helping to evolve the ecologies in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sorcery For Scientists

This Is What Conspiracy Really Looks Like

Global instability, feedback, and your survival

Can You Make Yourself Smarter?

Who is the shadow government?

Open Journals: something good to report

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 people are discussing this page, with 43 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

People need to stop thinking linearly about how so... by lincoln stoller on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:00:33 AM
your intent...what are you saying? Isn't one label... by Christopher Lunn on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:38:24 PM
The point is: do not look at labels at all, look a... by lincoln stoller on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 11:40:22 PM
The more you read about the inner workings of Gold... by Chaz Valenza on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:58:53 AM
...complaining about a "conspiracy" on Wall Street... by Terry Adcock on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 11:20:04 AM
If the media were to be reporting on this as if it... by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:45:35 PM
...and he has had Michael Moore on his program to ... by Terry Adcock on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:44:55 AM
I'd say it's both: conspiracy is the structure, cr... by lincoln stoller on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:59:57 AM
Not to play-at all...everything you write here is ... by Kevin Cody on Saturday, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:15:51 PM
Corporations obtain no benefit from collaborating ... by Phil Weingart on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 11:21:21 AM
...and a solution that might bring progress to our... by Terry Adcock on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:49:26 PM
...from a knee-jerk Progressive. Reducing the size... by Phil Weingart on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:14:42 PM
You are the one spouting talking points from Ruper... by Terry Adcock on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:43:40 AM
Name-calling is the strategy of someone who can't ... by Rob Kall on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:38:12 AM
If the first and last forms of government are self... by Ned Lud on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:12:28 AM
As an unrepetant liberal, people's lawyer I get th... by Miriam Callaghan on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:11:05 PM
People should simply define the responsibilities o... by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:12:06 PM
That's such a childish insult, especially when it'... by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:15:24 PM
That's "rich."Excluding the above delusional comme... by Kevin Cody on Saturday, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:08:30 PM
infinite benefit by the nature of their existence.... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:51:57 AM
in response mainly to Phil.... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:54:56 AM
It's a failure to care.... by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:21:58 PM
to the right's efforts to protect the 99% of indiv... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:55:57 AM
If you say yes you have to follow 2 rules: 1) When... by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:01:39 PM
Mr. Stoller's point is important to keep in mind w... by Philip Zack on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 11:22:02 AM
"This is what government conspiracy really is, and... by Christopher Lunn on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:26:22 PM
I believe you are overlooking my main point when y... by lincoln stoller on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:44:39 PM
Your contension is that futility rests in focus up... by Christopher Lunn on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:10:12 AM
Dear Mr. Stoller, as a self-proclaimed "junior so... by Gary Brumback on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:20:18 PM
My point is not to deny conspiracies, but to point... by lincoln stoller on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:30:04 PM
Not that I didn't find your piece worthwhile, b... by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:26:43 PM
what "&nbsp" means.  Terry uses it freque... by Dean on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:19:43 PM
The fiendishly-clever Word software exports the co... by Michael Rose on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:02:08 PM
In case your question is serious, and Michael's ex... by Maxwell on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:44:19 PM
Irrelevant and immaterial. Whether the cooperativ... by Paul Repstock on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:41:19 PM
Wave or particle? Animal or vegetable? Plann... by Ned Lud on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:29:04 AM
I agree that considering something a conspiracy or... by lincoln stoller on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:39:17 AM
When you talk dirty to me. In fact, I encourage... by Ned Lud on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:02:33 AM
In an economy now controlled by banksters, wh... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:02:20 AM
During the last financial crisis, the Federal Rese... by Richard Clark on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:20:21 AM
And the Fed and the government as a whole are cert... by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:58:57 PM
insofar as the system in place encourages corrupti... by Maxwell on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:14:01 PM
The point is not "what are the right answers?" The... by lincoln stoller on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:16:24 AM