Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 14   Well Said 13   Valuable 10   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/11/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (28 comments)

The Plot to Destroy Social Security

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (57 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com


Yoda by By Creativity + Tiimothy K. Hamilton

Michael Collins

(Washington, Dec 10)  Bill Clinton showed up at the White House for an "impromptu" press conference to discuss the president's tax compromise with the Republicans.  Clinton disclosed that "I make a lot of money now" and, as a result, he would benefit from the program.  Then he endorsed the compromise calling it the best deal Obama could make.  Clinton was particularly high on the Social Security payroll tax reduction.  "According to all economic analysis, [this is] the single most effective tax cut you can do to support economic activity. This will actually create a fair number of jobs. I expect it to lower the unemployment rate and keep us going." (Image)

Across town, United States Senator Bernie Sanders was telling the simple truth that Obama and Clinton avoided.  Reducing the Social Security payroll tax from 6.2% to 4.2% as a one year tax holiday presumes that the normal rates will be restored at the end of the one year period.  Who would restore those rates?  The very same party that passed the Bush ten year "temporary" income tax reductions.  That same party, the Republicans, now claims that ending the Bush temporary tax cuts represents the greatest tax increase ever.  Just as they forgot that those tax cuts were temporary, the new Republican majority will forget the payroll cuts were temporary.  Senators Bob Corker (R-TN) and Mike Johanns (R-NE) agree that ending the tax holiday will be portrayed as a tax increase.

Social Security has a dagger at its heart.  In 2011, we will have a president who won't even fight for Social Security when he has a majority in Congress and a House of Representatives with a veto proof majority that won't repeal any tax cut until Hell freezes over.

The citizens of this country have been betrayed by the smoothest con artists around for the benefit of the ultra rich, with the ultimate demise of Social Security assured by a rock solid majority of Republican extremists waiting in the wings to occupy the 112th Congress.

Where's the opposition?

The nation's largest organization for seniors, AARP, endorsed the Obama payroll tax cuts.  The organization did this despite the fact that the Obama compromise offers little in the way of benefits for seniors.

The allegedly liberal publication, Mother Jones, just ran a piece by Obama apologist Kevin Drum claiming that there's every reason to believe that the payroll tax holiday will be over in just one year promised in this deal.  It's another example of tortured logic listing Republican avarice and concluding they'll honor their word.

The self styled advocates for a FDR revival, New Deal 2.0, ran two opinion pieces supporting the Obama deal.  One argued it was that the president "probably did the best he could" while the other actually praised the deal claiming that this was the "best deal" that Obama could get.  A third piece noted that Obama didn't know much about FDR's Social Security proposal but left the president untouched on the Trojan Horse payroll tax reduction.  What would FDR do?  Capitulate and equivocate.  Hardly.

The largest organization representing seniors, 40 million strong, just caved.  They and the president got some  cover by two organizations that advertise as being of the left who also caved.

That leaves Senator Sanders, those who will support him for real filibuster, focused advocates for the program, and citizens of the United States.  The House Democratic Caucus rejected Obama's proposal to some fanfare.  But their objections were on how the bill was rolled out and specifics like a $5 million threshold for any estate tax.

Addictions 101

Two key features of the bipartisan political establishment are an addiction to stealing money from the people for their patrons, the corporate and ultra rich elite, and total denial that taking the peoples' money to satisfy this relentless craving is both harmful and morally unacceptable.

The Money Party is at the peak of its craving for more money earned their old fashioned way, through expropriation from the masses.  They will not be denied.  They are Hell bent on making their once false prophesies that Social Security is bankrupt into a living reality.

We are nothing to them.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.themoneyparty.org

Michael Collins is a writer in the DC area who researches and comments on the corruptions of the new millennium. His articles focus on the financial manipulations of The Money Party, the abuse of power by government, and features on elections and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Don't forget too... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:22:01 AM
You're right by Michael Collins on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:07:09 PM
It is a lot easier to pillage when everyone is too broke to by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:38:38 PM
Thanks Mark by Michael Collins on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:09:43 PM
The long game? by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:55:58 PM
THANK YOU MICHAEL by Linda Laurin on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:47:47 PM
Thanks Linda by Michael Collins on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:15:28 PM
AARP by sommers on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:09:21 PM
No private accounts by BFalcon on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:01:15 PM
Some good points but Social Security is sound by Michael Collins on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:13:01 PM
Addictions by Nancy S on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:26:36 PM
What they also don't mention is that anyone who collects by Michael Shaw on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:40:57 PM
Social Security Tax Cut by Bob Kral on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:13:16 PM
Their logic is convoluted by Michael Collins on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:19:20 PM
The greedy, drunk with power by Allen Oliver on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:34:41 PM
Time to liquidate their vaporware - take back our assets by Michael Collins on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:11:32 PM
Exactly!!! by Allen Oliver on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:30:45 PM
Yes, right by sommers on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:38:53 PM
The truth is those with the most wealth are the entitled by Michael Shaw on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:36:24 PM
The President Joins in Taking Down Social Security by Emily Dale on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:29:22 PM
Key point Emely by Michael Collins on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:58:39 PM
GREAT ARTICLE, MICHAEL by Blaine Kinsey on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:37:43 PM
Permanent tax cuts for the rich.... by Michael Shaw on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:29:57 PM
Er...this theory can't stand a moment's examinaton. by Perry Logan on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:15:48 AM
AS USUAL by John Reed on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:15:59 AM
The solution by Michael Collins on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:02:50 PM
AARP's position is shameful! They should be boycotted! by Eugene Elander on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:35:25 AM
They should be boycotted and they need an inside revolt by Michael Collins on Monday, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:47:07 PM