OpEdNews Op Eds

The Most Anti-Environment Congress in History: Here's the Record

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -


House Speaker John Boehner by reddogreport.com

Global temperatures are rising, violent weather is increasing; chemicals in the air, food supply and water might be leading to soaring rates of allergies, asthma, certain cancers, hormone disruption, male infertility. Forest lands are vanishing at unprecedented rates, vast dead zones are spreading in the world's oceans, we are running out of non-renewable fossil fuels.

Everyone knows that we are facing an unprecedented environmental crisis -- right?

Wrong. This news seems never to have gotten through to America's Republican legislators. In the face of these huge and escalating threats, the GOP majority over the last year has voted no fewer than 247 times (nearly once a day for every day the House was in session) to weaken environmental protections that have been in place for decades and to defeat needed legislation.

This according to a report released on Monday by Representatives Henry Waxman, a member the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Edward Markey a member of the Committee on Natural Resources. They have called the 112th Congress the most anti-environment ever. Here is how Waxman and Markey break down this dismal record.

  • 77 votes to undermine Clean Air Act protections, including votes to repeal the health- based standards that are the heart of the Clean Air Act and to block EPA regulation of toxic mercury and other harmful emissions from power plants, incinerators, industrial boilers, cement plants, and mining operations.
  • 39 votes to weaken protection of public lands and wildlife, including votes to halt reviews of public lands for possible wilderness designations and to remove protections for salmon, wolves, sea turtles, and other species.
  • 37 votes to block action to address climate change, including votes to overturn EPA's scientific findings that climate change endangers human health and welfare; to block EPA from regulating carbon pollution from power plants, oil refineries, and vehicles; to prevent the United States from participating in international climate negotiations; and even to cut funding for basic climate science.
  • 31 votes to undermine Clean Water Act protections, including votes to strip EPA of authority to set water quality standards and enforce limits on industrial discharges; to repeal the EPA's authority to stop mountaintop removal mining disposal; and to block EPA from protecting headwaters and wetlands that flow into navigable waters.

And House Republicans have not been content merely to shoot down vital new environmental legislation. They have pushed through laws that tie the hands of government agencies making "the issuance of new regulations more difficult, if not impossible." Three bills were passed with unanimous Republican support that require federal regulatory agencies to:

- Advertisement -

"Use time-consuming quasi-judicial procedures to issue major rules, add more than 60 new requirements to agency rulemaking, prevent new rules from going into effect unless approved by both the House and Senate, and subject the rules to new judicial challenges, such as lawsuits contesting the agency's cost-benefit analysis."

Why are these conservative politicians so anxious to gut environmental laws and cripple US regulators? That's easy-- just follow the money. The folks who gained the most from these votes, according to Markey and Waxman, were, you guessed it, the oil and gas industry. They report that in little over a year the House has voted 109 times for policies that would advance the interests of the oil and gas industry at the expense of the environment, public health, and the taxpayer.

So nobody will be surprised to learn that Republicans were far and away the largest recipients of oil and gas industry largesse in recent elections. House Republicans received more than four times the campaign contributions as Democrats ($38 million as opposed to $9 million) from these corporations, according to data published by the Center for Responsive Politics. The coal industry too contributed over 8 million dollars last year -- their highest level on record -- 85 percent of it going to House Republicans.

What can we expect in the future as cash from Big Energy continues to pour in to corrupt our legislative process?

"These votes are just a preview of coming attractions if the fossil fuel industries get their way and place more Republicans in Congress and the White House," Markey stated in a press release. "With that kind of cast, anti-environmental blockbusters will be the norm, sending more mercury into our kids, more air pollution into our lungs, and more carbon pollution into our atmosphere."
- Advertisement -

 

Richard Schiffman is the author of two spiritual biographies and is a poet based in New York City, as well as a freelance journalist. His passions are his love of nature, studying the world's great mystical traditions and activist writing and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Dow and Monsanto Join Forces to Poison America's Heartland

Do the Wealthy Lie, Cheat and Steal More Than the Rest of Us?

Guess What Drugs and Illegal Substances Are Showing Up in Chicken?

America Still Hasn't Learned the Lessons of Fukushima

What the Insurance Industry Already Knows About Climate Change

The Truth About Thanksgiving: What They Never Taught You in School

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The facts show that Republicans in congress must b... by Philip Pease on Friday, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:35:18 PM