Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Great deficit debate: looking for money in all the wrong places

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Wipe our Debt by Images_of_Money's photostream
    For the last two years we've heard the same mantra from the GOP and its mouthpiece, FOX News: "We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem." It's usually said with solemnity and sometimes a hint of compassion, as if the speaker understands how painful this hard Truth  is for fiscal weaklings.

   The "spending problem" is, of course, all about "entitlements"--especially Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. It's not about our military spending, even though the U.S. spends as much on defense as the next 14 countries combined.

Compared to our potential "enemies," we spend five times as much as China, ten times as much as Russia, and 95 times as much as Iran. These ratios are crazy. Moreover, our defense budget is at a historic high.

As shown in the chart below, even apart from the cost of the war in Afghanistan, the U.S. is spending more in constant dollars on its military now than it did at the height of the wars in Korea and Vietnam. Obama continues to spend as much as Reagan did at the peak of his cold war struggle with the Soviet super power. However, Reagan started cutting back as the Soviet Union moved toward dissolution in 1989, and this reduction continued under Bush I and Clinton.

by Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments

Source: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments

President Eisenhower, a five-star general and former commander of allied forces in Europe, would have been very aware of America's military needs. Yet his defense budget, in the midst of the Cold War, was $300 billion less than Obama's. With the end of the wars in Iraq (2010) and Afghanistan (2014), why aren't we seeing reductions at least as great as those after Korea (1953), Vietnam (1975) and the Cold War?

Let's stop gorging a bloated bureaucracy known for its waste and sloppy financial management. The U.S. Government Accountability Office complained in 2011 and 2012 of " serious financial management problems at the Department of Defense (DOD) that made its financial statements unauditable."

- Advertisement -

By bringing our defense budget down to Eisenhower, Nixon or Clinton levels, we could save between $150 and $300 billion each year ($1.5-3 trillion over the ten-year period for which we set our deficit-reduction targets).

The GOP mantra claims the deficit is "not a revenue problem," meaning we can't or shouldn't get more revenue by raising taxes. Even though, as Foreign Affairs put it recently, "Compared with other developed countries, the United States has very low taxes."

Conservatives tell us we need to keep those taxes low because raising taxes on income or businesses will make our economy less competitive in the global marketplace. It will cause investors to lose heart and be a slap in the face of "job creators."

   Let's test this claim by looking at other advanced capitalist democracies with higher taxes. Are they trailing us in the global economy? Let's focus on northern Europe where, according to Conservatives, monster governments maraud their economies, sucking up private capital to feed generous social programs that morally stunt their citizens.

   U.S. total tax revenue as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) is 26.9%. Germany, the EU's economic powerhouse, weighs in at 40.6%. And--no surprise--Denmark tops out at 49%, followed closely by Sweden (47.9%), and both Finland and Norway at 43.6% (Heritage Foundation 2012).

- Advertisement -

   So what's it like under the oppressive Danish government? The Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal publish an annual Index of Economic Freedom (defined as governments "allow[ing] labor, capital and goods to move freely, and refrain[ing] from coercion. . . beyond the extent necessary to protect and maintain liberty itself") . The 2013 Index ranks Denmark higher than the U.S.

   The World Bank's International Finance Corporation annually ranks national economies on "ease of doing business" (with emphasis on simplicity of regulations, protection of property rights and ease of starting a local firm). The   U.S. is 4th, Denmark 5th and Norway 6th out of 185 nations.

   In the World Economic Forum's Global Competitive Index, Finland (3), Sweden (4) and Germany (6) outrank 7th-place U.S. In Forbes Magazine's "Best Countries for Business" list, Denmark (3), Sweden (7), Norway (8) and Finland (9) are ahead of 12th-ranked U.S. (out of 141 nations).

Next Page  1  |  2


I'm a retired philosophy professor at Centre College. I also am a regular columnist for our local paper, The Danville Advocate-Messenger, as well as the Lexington Herald-Leader. My last book was Posthumanity-Thinking Philosophically about the Future (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Are humans creating a posthuman future?

The Mythology of Individualism

Walmart, Waltons epitomize America's class war

Denmark: Land of the Free

Do American workers have the Stockholm Syndrome?

The toxic legacy of Milton Friedman


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A Financial Transactions Tax or the savings from a... by Brian Cooney on Monday, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:59:55 AM
We also have an assets and sovereignty problem.&nb... by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:03:20 AM
Good points. I am often struck by how effectively ... by Brian Cooney on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:17:53 AM
Historically, it has been the private sector, inte... by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:12:37 PM