Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 10 (13 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Mythology of Individualism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 6/10/11

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

The mythology of individualism

Paul Ryan by public
In her Textbook of Americanism, GOP saint Ayn Rand wrote: "The basic principle of the United States of America is Individualism." At a 2005 celebration honoring Rand, Republican young gun Paul Ryan declared that every battle fought by Republicans "usually comes down to one conflict - individualism versus collectivism."

            Randian conservatives are ok with private collectives--even corporations powered by the activities of hundreds of thousands of employees and revenues larger than many nations. What they fear and loathe is the political collective, a people or community pursuing a common good through government action.

            As the influential libertarian philosopher Robert Nozick put it, "There is no social entity with a good . . . . There are only individual people, different individual people, with their own individual lives." In other words, society is nothing but a multitude of individuals for whom there is no public good, only private goods sought by different individuals and groups.

            Nozick would add that, in a free society, no individual or group should use the power of government to force others to contribute to their private goals such as food or medicine. Doing so amounts to enslavement. As Rand Paul said, if you want to legislate universal healthcare, "you believe in slavery."

The only acceptable role for government is to protect individuals' property and liberty from aggressors.

            Individualists want a political system built around self-made, self-reliant and value-creating agents whose connections to other humans are purely voluntary or contractual. That's why they see the free market as society itself, as the natural environment for human nature.

            Of course, the very idea of a market society is hard to reconcile with the individualist picture of humans. Our constant transactions with each other show our dependence on goods and services provided by others.

- Advertisement -

            Individualists would respond that these transactions are voluntary in a free-market society. Each of us can choose with whom to deal and which things we do for ourselves rather than rely on others.

            We make ourselves who we are and we create values by these choices. When we get what we want through market transactions, we draw on our own resources to offer something that another person needs in return.

            Behold the individualist's new Adam--a gift to the world from our exceptional culture. This muscular ego is the creature of what Herbert Hoover called "the American system of rugged individualism."

            There is something very appealing about this picture. All of us want our children to become self-reliant and value-creating individuals, and a healthy society needs to nurture these traits in all its citizens.

            However, this picture is deeply flawed because what it leaves out is just as important as what it includes. No one is self-made. A society makes individuals just as much as individuals make a society.

- Advertisement -

            Nothing is closer to the very core of an individual than their thought processes. Yet it is language that makes thought possible by supplying the mind with ideas and rules for combining them. There is no private language--it's community property.

A few individuals manage to put words or ideas together in very original ways, like Shakespeare or Einstein. Yet even they would have been impossible without their societies' language and education, and without institutions (such as the theater and science) which they did not create.

Every individual's life is an intersection of pre-scripted roles (e.g. being parents, spouses or professionals) that we did not invent, and without which our behavior would be unintelligible to others or to ourselves. Like actors on a stage, we play these roles more or less well.

Next Page  1  |  2


I'm a retired philosophy professor at Centre College. I also am a regular columnist for our local paper, The Danville Advocate-Messenger, as well as the Lexington Herald-Leader. My last book was Posthumanity-Thinking Philosophically about the Future (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Are humans creating a posthuman future?

The Mythology of Individualism

Walmart, Waltons epitomize America's class war

Denmark: Land of the Free

Do American workers have the Stockholm Syndrome?

The toxic legacy of Milton Friedman


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Who is this "Robert Nozick"? Based upon these stat... by Stefan Thiesen on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:18:29 AM
The construct of society based on individualism is... by bogi666 on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:38:01 AM
This Nozick man makes me positively sick. He remin... by Stefan Thiesen on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:19:39 AM
Basically the randian/conservacorporatistchristfas... by SherryGT on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:52:20 AM
Ayn Rand was an amphetamine addict, died when poor... by bogi666 on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:43:49 AM
Rand was traumatized by the Soviets and their coll... by Joe Giambrone on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:14:13 PM
Brilliant!  ... by shelley thoppil on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:59:26 PM
I agree with almost everything you wrote.  Of... by racetoinfiniti on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:39:07 AM
Indigenous Americans, Africans organization of the... by bogi666 on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:25:06 AM
What I called Trumpism conditions people to see gr... by Brian Cooney on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:22:38 PM
Even Palin's core at the Tea Party now call her a ... by James Murtagh on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:19:26 PM
"Those people", to sound like them, forget that wi... by Pericles21 writes on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:41:13 PM
Just as the myth of Ronald Reagan bears little res... by ORAXX on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:58:56 PM
Any healthy system must have a blend of elements i... by Paul Sedkowski on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:29:04 PM
Thank you Professor Cooney --for articulating and ... by Craig Daniels on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:31:07 PM
To me seems that americans are more uniformist and... by John Smith on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:48:37 PM
As far back as cave people, human beings real... by Silverpegasus on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:44:07 AM
You're echoing the biggest misunderstaning. When p... by Paul Sedkowski on Monday, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:26:02 PM