Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Supported 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (36 comments)

The Effects Of Tax-Financed Spending V. Debt-Financed Spending

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

 

By Patricia L Johnson and Richard E Walrath

President Clinton was voted into office in 1992 and served for eight years.   When he took over the office of President we had three tax rates, 15%, 28% and 31% and the country had been running deficits that added to the national debt for decades.

During his first term in office; the income tax rates in this country were raised by adding two additional categories, 35% and 39.6% for high earners.   The tax increases turned the entire system around and by the time Clinton left office we had a $236 billion dollar surplus for FY 2000.  

The first thing President Bush did when he entered office was reduce tax rates, mostly benefiting the rich and big business until we reached the current low rate of 10% and high rate of 35%.   These rates are scheduled to stay in effect until the end of 2012 due to the fact our Republican controlled congress refuses to increase taxes on the wealthy.  

*Republican controlled congress refuses to increase taxes on wealthy.

Whether the various tax increases/decreases were initiated under Republican and/or Democratic Presidents is not as important as the results achieved by the changes.

In the area of Jobs

Under higher taxes 23.1 million jobs were added to the economy during the eight years of the Clinton administration.   Under lower taxes approximately 3.0 million jobs were added during the eight years of the George W. Bush administration.   On a per year basis, Clinton created more jobs per year than 10 other presidents, from George W. Bush, through Harry S. Truman.  

In the area of the National Debt in real numbers and as a percentage of GDP

The National Debt after Clinton's two terms in office, with higher taxes, stood at $5.7 trillion.   When Clinton went into office the debt as a percentage of GDP was 66.1 percent.   When he left office eight years later, debt as a percentage of GDP was 56.4 percent or an eight-year decrease of 9.7 percent.

The National Debt after Bush's two terms in office, with lowered taxes, stood at $10.0 trillion.   When Bush went into office the debt as a percentage of GDP was 56.4 percent.   When he left office eight years later, debt as a percentage of GDP was 63.5 percent or an eight-year increase of 7.1 percent.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Richard E Walrath and Patricia L Johnson are co-owners of the Articles and Answers News and Information sites.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A Free Ride by Patricia Johnson on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:34:18 AM
Unfortunately by BFalcon on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:26:51 AM
Unfortunately by B. Falcon by Patricia Johnson on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:50:41 AM
Do tell by bern on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:22:51 PM
Here we have the ignorant that I am talking about by BFalcon on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:11:14 PM
Exactly, we agree by BFalcon on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:50:27 PM
Continuation by BFalcon on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:55:52 PM
I am not rich nor extremely smart but even I know better by bern on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:56:46 PM
I am not rich nor extremely smart but even I know better by Patricia Johnson on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:57:13 AM
You said it.. the country has been doing a lot of stealing by bern on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:10:24 PM
You are suggesting that they are somehow better by Odyseus_97 on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:29:07 PM
Bravo by BFalcon on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:28:40 PM
You would remove now, would you by BFalcon on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:22:44 PM
third way to create money by Scott Baker on Saturday, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:14:38 PM
third way to create money by Patricia Johnson on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:05:39 AM
Well... by Scott Baker on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:20:16 PM
It's called printing money,, backed by nothing. by bern on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:31:33 PM
Not so... by Scott Baker on Monday, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:31:03 AM
"print" or "coin"? by Robert Coss on Sunday, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:35:12 AM
coin vs. Coin by Scott Baker on Sunday, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:35:41 PM
SOLYNDRA by Miriam Callaghan on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:34:16 PM
The problem with a number of Americans is they by Odyseus_97 on Sunday, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:33:56 PM
Let me see if I can explain to you.. by bern on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:27:01 AM
You must be kidding.... by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:19:15 PM
Land tax stupid idea.. High frequency trading tax good idea. by bern on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:41:16 AM
Why don't we just take the land away,, like the communist do by bern on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:44:18 AM
You need to read about how the spanish settlers of Calif by bern on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:07:22 PM
In the immortal word of Dick Cheney: So? by Scott Baker on Friday, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:57:24 AM
It is called buying the land, by bern on Friday, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:06:57 AM
sorry , you are wrong.. ur mixing apples and oranges. by bern on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:27:57 PM
The real tax rate is 17% by Scott Baker on Friday, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:46:06 AM
Over 200,000 companies are gone,, yes gone forever. by bern on Friday, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:00:40 AM
Nearly half of Chinese millionaires are thinking about leavi by bern on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:55:55 AM
What rich person wouldn't want to move here? by Robert Coss on Sunday, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:57:25 AM
Your numbers lie by bern on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:14:38 PM
Can we follow your reasoning too? by Robert Coss on Sunday, Nov 6, 2011 at 11:32:05 AM