OpEdNews Op Eds

The Bruce Ivins Anthrax Case coverage, not so good.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/18/08

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

Memo to the our print press: Stop believing your faxes from the FBI about the anthrax case. They’re just making you look really, really bad.

David Willman at the L.A. Times put out what is being called “an independent investigation” of the anthrax case and man, I’m so glad my life doesn’t depend on it.

“Records show that the FBI missed signs pointing to Ivins in the deadly mailings: He used a restricted lab at key times and failed to provide a sample or report a supposed spill. The investigation instead remained locked on a former Army researcher."

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-na-anthrax15-2008aug15,0,7898836.story?track=rss

Where do we begin? Sorry, David. The FBI lied to you about Ivins’ samples. He turned in the right sample but the FBI screwed up the labwork, as was reported in the New York Times this weekend. Then the FBI turned around and lied about it on CSPAN. This is the Bush Justice Department, after all. You believed them?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/16/washington/16anthrax.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin

- Advertisement -


Similarly, Bruce Ivins reported that spill to his Ethics officer right away:

http://www.propublica.org/article/ivins-told-ethics-officer-about-anthrax-clean-up-806

So, who was this “the Army officer that concluded that Ivins' stealth bleaching of his work area was related to the anthrax mailings”? Because I bet he’s a great spinner of tales.

This entire story has been one embarrassing peep show of the AP, the Washington Post and the LA Times caught with their drawers down. Or, with their palms out, it’s hard to tell which. May it's just a matter of bad journalistic proxemics.

While the FBI has been feeding their sorry, falling apart excuse for a case to their media mules, they've also gagged potential contrarians in Frederick and at Ft. Detrick. Thank God they have the public good at heart, no?

Let's be clear. Bruce Ivins can't be placed in Florida or in New Jersey, where the anthrax letters were mailed. He didn't try to mislead the FBI with his samples. He didn't try to hide a spill in his lab. He had no particular reason to target Tom Daschle or Pat Leahy and he didn't seem very concerned about anyone else in particular in the mountain of his communications that are now a matter of public record.

He was not a loner. He took week long vacations with his brother and his nephew every year. He was a married man with two adopted children, was liked by his colleagues and neighbors. He mentored young scientists and went to rest homes with friends to entertain people with his juggling. He was active in his church and was known to write songs that humorously celebrated his co-worker's promotions.

No expert not connected to the government seems to believe he had the skill or equipment to produce the anthrax product that was mailed to the public.

The only thing left to tar Bruce Ivins with is his mental health issues. For which he sought treatment and talked about frankly with friends.

This whole story isn't adding up, is it? Good enough for government work and for their adjuncts in our print press.

 

Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

After Haiti: A Conversation with John Perkins

History to Obama: Yes, we have made war on democracies

What the FBI Knows: For Bruce Ivins and For Us

Is Freedom's Watch PNAC in Populist Drag?

I Can't Believe It's Not Human Rights Watch!

To Mr. Obama From His Newly Gay Constituents

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Nice research and presentation, Beth. It is obviou... by livvy on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:32:54 PM
by the FBI?  My teenagers used to do it mostl... by Elizabeth Ferrari on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:28:48 PM
deaf, dumb, and blind.... by Colleen McLean on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:53:58 PM
we have no access to either facts or to our own br... by Elizabeth Ferrari on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:31:08 PM
click here... by Elizabeth Ferrari on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:08:38 PM
Comment from Ratings:   i knew it was a ... by Ida Hakim on Tuesday, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:02:04 PM