Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The BBC vs. FOX, NBC, ABC, et al

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 7/8/14

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -

Cross-posted from Mike Malloy

From youtube.com/watch?v=Jh40MMl4rMM: Global Warming Climate Change causes conflict  - BBC News
Global Warming Climate Change causes conflict - BBC News
(image by YouTube)
  DMCA
Well, well, well ... Fancy this!

The BBC Trust (it is what it sounds like) periodically reviews (since 2010) the scope and content of its science reporting. They put it this way:

"Scientific developments have the capacity to directly affect us all significantly. Debates relating to everything from climate change to medical advances to DNA technology feature prominently in our public discourse. And ethical, policy and funding questions associated with science arouse strong emotions. As a consequence they often strike at the core of sensitive editorial issues. So it is vital that the BBC's audience enjoys science coverage of the very highest standards."

Read again that last sentence and try to imagine such a standard being applied to Fox, ABC, CNN, etc.

The BBC also strongly recommends its science reporters attend seminars organized by the world's leading scientists, researchers, and science writers. The point in attending is to be able to separate fact-based reporting from the sort of garbage swung hither and yon by US media outlets, especially television.

"License fee payers expect the BBC to meet the highest standards of impartiality and accuracy. That applies as much to science as it does to the world of politics and policy ... The UK is a world leader in science and part of the BBC's function must be to keep the public informed of advances in scientific thinking and about the ethical and policy dilemmas posed by scientific research. ..." (emphasis added)

- Advertisement -

The idea of seeking "balance" in reporting the impending multiple crises connected to anthropogenic climate disruption is especially singled out as an example of providing the right-wing climate deniers a forum for their ignorance when none should be provided. Then there's the section of the report that shows definitively the difference between US reporting on science issues -- notably, climate disruption -- and that of the BBC:

"The coverage of science by the BBC continues to be a hotly debated issue. One of the key findings of the report is there is at times an ... 'over-'rigid' application of the Editorial Guidelines on impartiality in relation to science coverage, which fails to take into account what (is regarded) as the 'non-contentious' nature of some stories and the need to avoid 'undue attention to marginal opinion'... the existence of man-made climate change is an example of this point." (emphasis added)

Don't we love the Brits and their proper way of saying that the scientifically illiterate -- climate change deniers being in the forefront currently -- should simply be denied any sort of podium or credibility where it concerns science in general and something as specifically in need of focus and direct action as climate change.

In other words -- if I may use Malloy-style American profanity -- the climate deniers should shut the f*ck up and go back to their religious superstitions and tales of fantasy. The fate of the human race is too important to be sidetracked into listening to their bullshit.

- Advertisement -

 

www.mikemalloy.com

Mike Malloy is a former writer and producer for CNN (1984-87) and CNN-International (2000). His professional experience includes newspaper columnist and editor, writer, rock concert producer and actor. He is the only radio talk show host in America to have received the A.I.R (Achievement in Radio) Award in both (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Move Over, Mother Teresa

The Savage Weiner

Collateral Damage?

Remember, Remember, the 5th of November...

'Soldiers work for corporations, not for the people'

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The Brits are a logical, scientific people. Much ... by Shirley Braverman on Tuesday, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:04:37 PM
I am just responding to the foolish notion that WE... by Suzana Megles on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:30:09 PM
In other words -- if I may use Malloy-style Americ... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:47:43 PM
Yep, you hit the nail on the head with that one. ... by John Dwyer on Wednesday, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:58:06 PM
The article is almost funny. The BBC's commitment ... by Daniel Noel on Thursday, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:16:44 PM