To Free A Lender-Owned Nation
The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.
Proverbs, 22:7
III. The Treasury-Fed
Coin-Swap Cover-Up
It depends upon what the meaning of the word "is" is.
[Bill Clinton testimony]
This is the third of four articles
writing up a litigation I filed in federal court in San Francisco on December
28, 2011, against the U.S. Treasury. Johnson
v. Department of the Treasury of the United States, et al. , case No. CV11
6684 (NJV). The suit alleges suppression of the great
benefits that would accrue to the government, if United States notes were to replace
Federal Reserve notes.
Part I introduces the issues.
Part
II explains the scaffolding of facts and law that raises the issues.
Part III summarizes the "Treasury-Fed Coin-Swap Cover-Up," and uncovers the face-value fiat money tax.
Part IV uncovers the full interest relief, and concludes.
1. The Embarrassing Coin-Swap Proposal and the
21-Year Old Cover Model
This is the
"coin-swap question":
"What
is the estimated net benefit, if any, to the government [taxpayer [1] ] of replacing the $1 note
with a $1 coin?"
The General Accounting Office last answered this
question for Hon. Richard Shelby, ranking member, Committee on Banking, Housing
and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, et alia, in the March, 2011 report, U.S. COINS: Replacing the $1
Note with a $1 Coin Would Provide a Financial Benefit to the Government ,
GAO-11-281, first noting (page 1):



