Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 8 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

THE ISRAELI-AMERICAN KILLING MACHINE

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 1/12/09

Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

BRED IN ITS BIBLICAL BONES
 
Only in the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes.
Deuteronomy 20:16
 

The Destruction of the Amorites by Gustave Doré, 1866

 
The tentacles of God's bloody instruction have been embraced as a political policy by the ancient Israelites, the papacy in Rome, the new world colonizing countries, the early government of the United States, and the current governments of the United States and its favorite strategic partner-in-crime, Israel. It reaches back four thousand years, more or less depending on when Moses was found floating among the bulrushes. It has a disgraceful, blood-ridden legacy.
 
The historian and magnificent literary stylist, Edward Gibbon, observed in his epic, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, the difficulty of selecting myths to establish a religion (or a country). It confounded the early Christians too. It seems that the Nazarene Christians were in heated dispute with the Gnostics since the latter were upset about the Israelite devastation wrought at God's behest. How, they argued, with its record of mayhem and destruction, could such a religion as Judaism have been instituted by the wisdom of the Deity?" Gibbon explains with more than a little sarcasm:

With the conquest of the land of Canaan, and the extirpation of the unsuspecting natives, they [the Gnostics] were at a loss how to reconcile with the common notions of humanity and justice. But when they recollected the sanguinary list of murders, of executions, and of massacres, which stain almost every page of the Jewish annals, they acknowledged that the barbarians of Palestine had exercised as much compassion towards their idolatrous enemies as they had ever shown to their friends or countrymen. (1)

And so the issue was decided. It was simple enough; barbarians beget barbarians as butchers beget butchers. And as history has long witnessed, blood and offal trace the path of the white man's progress through the land they still call God's country, whether it be Israel or America. No matter the perfume of their rhetoric, both reek from Biblical nostalgia.
 
It all began in the good old days of old Israel, in a land then inhabited by someone else. Sound familiar? The Canaanites were a sophisticated, ancient tribe that lived in a land bounded in the west by the Mediterranean, east by the Dead Sea, running northward through Syria, and bounded to the south by the land of Judah. Thus, Canaan generally comprised today's Israel. Talented in agriculture, hunting, and fishing, the Canaanites lived in well-planned towns with a city-state political system. Homes had plaster walls, many of which were painted, and drainage systems. They were far more advanced than the Israelites who had spent generation upon generation in captivity and wandering. Canaanite artisans worked in copper, lead, and gold. Their pottery was sophisticated and finely turned, prized in the world of that time. The problem was their religion, at least by God's and Israelite standards.
And for that the Canaanites would be destroyed.
 
In many ways, the primitive culture of the Canaanites was similar to the American Indian's. They had been on their land since time immemorial. But somehow Abraham's covenant with God trumped the Canaanites' historical claim. Jewish religious myth held that God gave this land to the Israelites. How? The Bible's Old Testament says so. End of discussion. The Canaanites should have written their own book, admittedly difficult since they were all slaughtered. Leading the Israelites out of captivity from Egypt, Moses hastened to the biblical Promised land. He spread mayhem as he went, as commanded by his (and, today, billions of others) inspiration, a figure now called alternatively Yahweh, Allah, and/or God, depending upon one's myth.
 

God's first victims, the Midianites.

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, Take full vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites; […] And Moses spoke to the people, saying, "Arm men from among you […] to execute the Lord's vengeance on Midian. [….] So they made war against Midian as the Lord had commanded Moses, and they killed every male [….] And Moses said to them, […] Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves. (Numbers 31:2-18)

Killing every male child? Moses had learned this tactic well from the pharaoh. And in the name of God, the Israelites were allowed to keep the virgins for themselves. And so the slaughter and destruction of the aboriginal inhabitants of Palestine commenced. And unbridled slaughter it was, an epic story of brutality. The stuff that nightmares and religions are made.
 
Of course, this is just one of the many murderous episodes described in arguably one of the most inspiration and revered books in the Old Testament, Exodus. Therein is the implementation phase of the Mosaic Covenant with God, a divinely inspired strategic alliance for delivering the heretofore hapless Jews out of slavery and into the Promised Land. It represents the fundamental precept of Judaism, that of the deliverance of the Israelites—the chosen people—into their God-given destiny. The heroic Moses leading the Israelites to the Promised Land, the Ten Commandments, the destruction of the Canaanites, it is all there, in the heart of the Torah. Of course, Christianity, too, has roots in the Mosaic Covenant but its New Testament symbol, the cross, has a connotation of redemption through self-sacrifice rather than slaughter. The Jews were 'delivered' because somehow they were identified by God as worthy of being chosen people. Perhaps God recognized their great potential? Perhaps. But we know that the Old-Testament-God demanded obedience. Orders were issued. Orders must be obeyed, no discussion allowed. But because the Israelites chose obedience along with the willingness to murder vast numbers of people, God loved them and gave them someone else's land.
 
"Jews are obligated to establish themselves as an ethical community of caring," noted philosopher Avishai Margalit in his book, The Ethics of Memory. "The force of the obligation is gratitude to God for having delivered their ancestors from the 'house of slaves' in Egypt." (2) The brain floods with images. Joshua stopping the sun, the walls of Jericho tumbling to the ground whereupon the Israelites, as the Bible relates, "slaughtered every living thing", the pharaoh's army drowning in the Red Sea, under the gaze of Moses, the stuff of epics, this stuff of destruction.
 
I do not mean to disparage this great escape from bondage. Slavery is bad, for all peoples, in all times, even for the South and Central American Indians, and the African blacks, all of whom were enslaved by God's white chosen people, and today's Palestinians, enslaved in a political, social, economic hell by a crushing occupation. But it is vital to note that this perpetration of violence was all of a piece with the religious covenants made with God. And that promise necessitated a slaughter of human beings, all creatures of God, by other creatures of God. And in Old Testament Israel—the taproot of Christianity—the violence was done unto others under the direct orders of God.

This thinking would continue well into the second millennium of Christ. Some would argue it exists to this day. Simply put, there are some people destined to be slaves. We know how the popes of 15th century Rome gave away the terra incognita of the new world in the name of God who, according to them, owned it since he had made it. Except that the popes claimed ownership as a sort proxy real estate agent for God. The result of all this? Violence. The killing that ran down the generations to this moment began with the myth of Exodus. Humanity learned well its first God-given lesson.
 
And Moses said to the people,

Remember this day when you went out from Egypt […] And it shall be when the Lord brings you to the land of the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Amorite, the Hivite and the Jubusite which he swore to your fathers to give you, a land flowing with milk and honey, that you shall observe this rite in this month. (Exodus 13:3-5)

And with that, the Lord, through Moses, his interlocutory strong-arm man, prescribed a series of dietary rituals, leavened by ritual slaughter of the first-born offspring of every beast owned, except donkeys. (Note: If by error one killed a donkey, one could be redeemed by killing a lamb. Blood. Blood. Blood.)
 
Taking up the bones of Joseph for protection, the Israelites set out on a long march of discontent and destruction. En route among the Israelites grumbling was constant. They rued they had ever left their slavery in Egypt. After all, in captivity at least they were fed. God grew angrier and angrier. Then, finally camping at Etham, "at the edge of the wilderness," God took charge. Who knows why God would select this motley crew over some other, more sophisticated, civilization—the Hittites, for example? But this was the way it was. It was written in the Bible. Amen to all that. Anyway, select the Israelites he did, at least according to the Israelite version of the victor's history. And it seems that God had even anticipated the unruliness and discontent of his chosen people. Thus he took scrupulous care to provide guidance that even they, the problematic Israelites, could understand—a celestial guidance system of sorts.

And the Lord was going before them in a pillar of fire by night to give them light. (Exodus 13:3-21)

And so under God's direction and sponsorship, the slaughter commenced. The first to go under the sword of Joshua (Moses' right-hand man and heir-apparent) were the people of Amalek. With Joshua and his men slugging it out below, and Moses standing on a nearby hill, the battle ebbed and flowed with the gestures of Moses. As a maestro conducts an orchestra, so long as Moses held up his staff, Joshua's side advanced. But when Moses would tire and his arm fell, Amalek and his troops would rally. What to do? Easy. Have Moses sit on a stone and have two aides prop up his arms. So he did and so came victory. None of this is either credible or exciting writing but triumph was soon his (and God's) for "Joshua had overwhelmed Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword" (Exodus 17:13)
 
And now God makes one of the least plausible statements in the entire Bible: "Then the Lord said to Moses, 'Write down this in a book as a memorial, and recite it to Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven." (Exodus 17:14) What? Record it in a book, the Bible no less, so it will be forgotten? Well, some ever-obedient Israelite scribe did so. And to this day we may all remember Amalek.
 
Moses, undeterred by an illogical commander-in-chief, proceeded on to Sinai and the issuance of the Ten Commandments. But it wasn't just ten. Rather it was a slew of other injunctions dealing with issues like how, and who, to compensate if an ox gores a slave, if a slave's tooth gets knocked out, and the behavioral complexities inherent when a donkey dies. Most interesting is the rendering of a convenient alibi for murder, thus adding a bizarre condition of clemency to the Fifth Commandment—thou shalt not kill. According to this quaint notion, killing was not a sin providing one did not engage in ambush, that is, concealment. Otherwise, murder most foul was fair.

He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death. But if he did not lie in wait for him, but God let him fall into his hand, then I will appoint you a place to which he may flee. (Exodus 21:12-13)
 

What does it mean to have "God let him fall into his hand"? Is this a license to kill based on every individual's inner voice that hears God say yea or nay? Like Moses and Joshua and the infamous 1976-77 New York City serial killer, David Berkowitz, the so-called Son of Sam, for example? And God will even provide a hideout? Yes, fair is foul and foul is fair, both in MacBeth and in the Bible.
 
Soon Moses received additional marching orders. More mayhem lay ahead. And the Lord spoke to Moses,

Depart, go up from here, you and the people whom you have brought up from the land of Egypt, to the land of which I swore to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, saying, "To your descendents I will give it. And I will send an angel before you and I will drive out the Canaanite, the Amorite, the Hittite, the Perizzite and the Jebusite. (Exodus 33:1-2)

Note the escalation, adding extirpation as an option. In the earlier command, no mention made of driving them out. (In colonial America, the American Indians were considered by reputable theologians of that time to be descendents of the uprooted Canaanites.) The Lord's blood was up, seemingly at both parties: at the above-mentioned foes, and at the thickheaded Israelites. So annoyed was he that he demurred from attending the next slaughter. "I will not go up in your midst, because you are an obstinate people, lest I destroy you on the way." (Exodus 33:3)
 
God seems on the verge of abandoning the chosen-people idea. But if he destroyed the Israelites "on the way," who would do God's dirty work on the others? What was God's divine plan? Other than murder and mayhem and punishment, not much else rises from these pages that have inspired millions of people for thousands of years. What was this mission of death and destruction about anyway? To simply kill off tribes so the Israelites would be able to live in the land of milk and honey? Why didn't God let them find (or develop) their own land of plenty, in a desert, for example? Like the Balfour Agreement pretended to do? The struggle would have been good for them, as struggle has been for all mankind through the ages as a way to build character. Then the Old Testament would have been a heroic tale of self-sacrifice and enterprise replacing all the blood and pillage. But regrettably it was not to be, not with this Old Testament God: "for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God" (Exodus 34:14). Yes and the romantic expectations inherent in the Balfour Agreement have also been dashed since its enactment. For God was also a greedy God.
 
"For I will drive out nations before you and enlarge your borders," said God. (Exodus 34:24).
 
And he did.
 
"And you shall consume all the nations whom the Lord your God will deliver to you; your eye shall not pity them." (Deut 7:16)
 
And they did, to their God's great pleasure.

Since then no prophet has risen in Israel like Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, for all the signs and wonders which the Lord sent him to perform in the land of Egypt against Pharaoh, all his servants, and all his land, and for all the mighty power and for all the great terror which Moses performed in the sight of all Israel. (Deut 34:12)

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://jamesryanbooks.com/

James (Cem)Ryan is a writer living in Istanbul, Turkey. A graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, he holds a Ph.D. in literature.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Forget Armenia, Turks Should Condemn American Indian Genocide

Letter to President Obama: Turkey in an Arena of Trials

LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA regarding deteriorating conditions in Turkey.

THE ISRAELI-AMERICAN KILLING MACHINE

A. K. P-NESS: The Condition of Being AKP, Turkey's Ruling Islamic Party

Letter to President Obama: The Islamic Republic of Turkey

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

it was God who actually told those people to do th... by shadow dancer on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:23:55 PM
It is obvious that all three books are written by ... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:45:33 PM
Death (Christ nearly forgotten).  People just... by Laudyms on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:54:25 PM