OpEdNews Op Eds

Steven Chu, Supporter of Nuclear Power, Resigns as U.S. Energy Secretary

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

    Secretary of Energy Steven Chu announced his resignation last week after four years of pushing nuclear power, although he promoted energy efficiency and safe, renewable energy technologies such as solar and wind, too.

   But nuclear power remained a major focus of Dr. Chu, a physicist out of the U.S. national nuclear laboratory system.   In his letter to Department of Energy employees announcing his departure, Chu listed as among "tangible signs of success" during his tenure the go-ahead for the building of "the first nuclear power plants in the last three decades" in the U.S.  

   His position on energy as energy secretary was similar to the stand he took in his previous role as director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. There he also promoted energy efficiency and renewables, but nuclear power was a main thrust of his energy stance.

   " Nuclear has to be a necessary part of the portfolio," declared Chu, as laboratory director, at an "economic summit" in California in 2008 sponsored by Stanford University. http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-9888608-60.html   He said in his speech: "The fear of radiation shouldn't even enter into this. Coal is very, very bad."

   As energy secretary, speaking at the Vogtle nuclear plant site in Georgia last year, where two of the new plants he cited in his letter are supposed to be built, he said:   "The resurgence of America's nuclear industry starts here in Georgia, where you just got approval for the first time in three decades to build new reactors. The Obama administration is committed to doing our part to help jumpstart America's nuclear industry. The Energy Department is supporting this project with more than $8 billion in conditional loan guarantees. And we have partnered with industry to support the certification and licensing of the new Westinghouse AP1000 reactor design." click here

Describing nuclear power as a "clean" energy technology, Chu said, "What you are doing here at Vogtle will help us compete in the global clean energy race and provide domestic, clean power to U.S. homes."

And, the year before, in a presentation before the International Atomic Energy Agency, Chu asserted: "Nuclear power will continue to be an important part of our energy mix, both in the United States and around the world."   The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster had occurred just six months before, and he also said: "The tragic events at Fukushima make clear that nuclear energy"also brings significant challenges to our collective safety and security." click here

Some news pieces in recent days about Chu's resignation have mentioned the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project and how--as the Las Vegas Review Journal accurately put it--Chu "carried out the Obama administration's plan to shut down" the project. 

For Chu as a nuclear laboratory director was a supporter of the plan

to deposit massive amounts of nuclear waste at the site, as noted by CNN in a 2011 piece.   http://money.cnn.com/2011/07/06/news/economy/nuclear_waste/index.htm   As energy secretary, Chu switched to the stance of President Obama (and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada). The mountain 100 miles from Las Vegas is riddled with earthquake faults.

In his letter to DOE employees, Chu challenged--as he pointed out Obama did in his recent inaugural address--those who deny climate change. "Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science"The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity has had a significant and likely dominant role in climate change," Chu wrote.

He went on to promote "clean" energy as an antidote.

The key problem here, however, is that by including nuclear power in the "clean" energy category, Chu refuses to accept that the nuclear "fuel cycle" involved in nuclear power--mining, milling, fuel fabrication, enrichment and so on--is a significant contributor to greenhouse gasses and climate change.

And he refuses to accept that true "clean" energy-- safe renewable energy technologies such as solar and wind--can provide all the energy we need and not contribute to climate change at all. "A Plan to Power 100 Percent of the Planet with Renewables" was a 2009 cover story in Scientific American, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-path-to-sustainable-energy-by-2030 , about one of several major studies done in recent years coming to the same conclusion.  

But Chu titled his 2010 essay, on his personal Facebook page--"Why We Need More Nuclear Power." He insisted that "we need nuclear power as part of a comprehensive solution." He asked for comments. https://www.facebook.com/notes/steven-chu/why-we-need-more-nuclear-power/336162546856   One reader, Matthew Cloner, commented on March 12, 2011: "I'm afraid that I cannot agree with you in your position, Dr. Chu. As the recent disaster in Japan unfolds before our eyes, it is very obvious that nuclear power is both extremely dangerous and environmentally unsound as an energy source."

But it's hard for Chu and many other scientists out of the national nuclear laboratory system to acknowledge the deadliness of the technology which is the basis for most of their work.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.karlgrossman.com

Karl Grossman is a professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury and host of the nationally syndicated TV program Enviro Close-Up.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New Book Concludes: Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer

Siemens' Abandoning Nuclear Power

Murdoch Media Empire: A Journalistic Travesty

Fukushima: A Month of Media Disinformation

What Could Truly End the Space Program: A Nuclear Disaster Overhead

The Cancer Epidemic: Its Environmental Causes

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thanks to people like Steven Chu, the America peo... by Christopher Calder on Wednesday, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:13:52 AM