Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Sci Tech

Real, Clean Energy Alternatives: Part 3 - Wind Power

      (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Supported 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/9/11

Author 43658
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)
- Advertisement -

Photo Wikimedia Commons, CC 1.0 Share Alike

Pt. 1: Concentrated Solar Power (CSP)
Pt. 2: Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)

In October 2009 Scientific American (SA) magazine hosted an investigation to "Power 100 Percent of the Planet with Renewables."  They decided that it was indeed feasible, and they suggested a mix of technologies to accomplish that goal.

"Our plan calls for millions of wind turbines, water machines and solar installations..."" (Scientific American)

Repeatedly the first option listed was wind.  Wind power has a long and successful history and is quite widespread in some parts of the world generating about 20% of Denmark's electricity right now.  The US has significant wind potential and many regions where the wind blows almost continuously.  As the Danes have shown, placing turbines just offshore is extremely viable.

Polls of Americans consistently show broad support for wind and other clean renewables, even before Fukushima.  A N. Carolina poll showed 80% favoring wind farm construction and 83% supporting solar farms (AP, March 1 2010, Elon poll shows support for wind, solar energy).

The call for a federal Renewable Energy Standard  (RES) of 25% by 2025 won a 77% approval rate from 600 likely voters in a poll conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, March 2010.

People seem to understand that investing in alternative energy means jobs and security.

- Advertisement -

Global Wind Leader: Denmark

The nation of Denmark also controls about one third of the world's wind turbine market.  Their R and D was pushed extensively in the early days by government subsidies.

"Energy taxes were channeled into research centers" It also mandated that utilities purchase wind energy at a preferential price -- thus guaranteeing investors a customer base." (TIME, Feb 25, 2009)

Currently Denmark simply exports excess wind generated power to its neighbors when winds are high, and then buys back from them when winds die down.

"Nuclear Power?  No Thanks."

- Advertisement -

That headline helped ban nuclear plant construction in 1980.  Volunteers of Denmark's "OOA" delivered pamphlets to every household.  Their decisive grassroots victory succeeded in forcing the turn toward renewables like wind.  Denmark's example shows that this is the cornerstone of changing a government's energy policy.  The citizens must rise up and demand a change in the law, a change in the tax structure, a change in the incentives.

The Danish government has actually promoted cooperatives where people invest together in community wind turbine projects.  This idea has led to the installation of over 5,000 grass roots turbines.  The concept then spread to Germany and the Netherlands.  People are encouraged to invest and can even profit from their local wind power.

"households may invest more than their own consumption plus 50%. However, revenues from any amount over this limit are taxed." (wind-works.org, Paul Gipe)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://politicalfilm.wordpress.com/

Joe Giambrone is an American author, freelance writer and filmmaker. Non-fiction works appear at International Policy Digest, WhoWhatWhy, Foreign Policy Journal, Counterpunch, Globalresearch, , OpedNews, High Times and other online outlets. His science fiction thriller Transfixion and his Hollywood satire (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is This the Man Who "Radicalized" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev?

The U.N. Would Never Lie to George Monbiot

The Future Children of Fukushima

Genocide and the Native American Experience

Nuclear Nightmare Worsens

Do I trust Christopher Nolan or his Batman?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

click here... by Joe Giambrone on Saturday, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:17:07 PM
Nonetheless, you forgot to mention that the techno... by Jeff Poster on Saturday, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:49:31 PM