Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Reagan's "Greed Is Good" Folly

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Supported 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/5/11

So, it turns out that greed isn't good after all -- at least not for the vast majority of the American people. But this is a lesson that many U.S. opinion leaders still resist.

For the past three decades -- since Ronald Reagan's Republican landslide in 1980 -- the United States has undertaken arguably the most destructive social experiment in American history, the incentivizing of greed among the rich by halving their top marginal tax rates.


Ronald Reagan

The idea -- once famously sketched out by right-wing economist Arthur Laffer on a napkin -- was to slash the tax rates on the rich to spur a "supply side" bonanza of economic growth and higher tax revenues for the government.

Before becoming Reagan's vice presidential running mate, George H.W. Bush labeled this tax strategy "voodoo economics," and Reagan's first budget director David Stockman warned that, without severe spending cuts, it could create a sea of red ink as far as the eye could see.

But the experiment was undertaken anyway, with Reagan persuading a large swath of the American electorate -- especially alienated white men -- that tax cuts heavily weighted to the rich were the way to go and that the most important priority was to get rid of federal regulations, or as Reagan phrased it, "government is the problem."

Reagan's sharply lower tax rates meant that the rich had a much stronger incentive to pad their salaries and grab whatever they could.

Instead of the richest Americans paying 70 percent or more of the highest tranche of their income to the Treasury as they did in the 1960s and 1970s (it was even higher, 90 percent, under President Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s), the rich saw Reagan reduce their marginal tax rates to 28 percent by 1988.

The tax bite on some millionaires could be even lower if their earnings were categorized as "capital gains," which were taxed at 15 percent. Over time, Republicans also eliminated the "estate tax" on large fortunes.

So, rather than discouraging excess wealth -- as had occurred under presidencies from Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy to Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter -- Reagan essentially encouraged the rich to be greedy. Greed went from being a moral sin to a policy goal.

Gordon Gekko, the fictional corporate raider played by Michael Douglas in Oliver Stone's "Wall Street," summed up Reagan's new paradigm: "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good."

Consolidating an Orthodoxy

In the 1984 presidential campaign, Reagan and the Republicans turned their radical tax policies into a national orthodoxy when Democratic nominee Walter Mondale announced that he would raise taxes if elected and Reagan then mocked campaign hecklers with the smiling rejoinder, "I'll let Mondale raise your taxes."

When Mondale was crushed in Reagan's 1984 landslide, it became clear that the American electorate had bought into this theory that lower taxes would be good for all.

Reagan's Vice President George H.W. Bush followed the beloved "Gipper" in 1988 with a Reagan-like promise: "Read my lips: no new taxes."

Though Bush eventually retreated somewhat from his pledge, lifting the top tax rate to 31 percent in 1991 as part of a deficit-reduction deal with Democrats, Reagan's low-tax orthodoxy had settled in as a permanent feature of U.S. politics, despite the huge deficits that it created.

Even modest efforts to roll back Reagan's folly have proved costly to politicians. Many congressional Democrats went down to defeat in 1994 after they supported President Bill Clinton's boost in the top marginal rates from 31 percent to 39.6 percent.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://www.consortiumnews.com

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The point of supply-side economics was to reverse ... by Paul Craig Roberts on Thursday, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:21:15 AM
It has been thoroughly covered already in an artic... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17:47 PM
So working hard, taking big risks, is greed? ... by bern on Thursday, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:51:46 PM
You missed the entire point of this article, didn'... by Ginger McClemons on Friday, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:46:52 PM
There really is not much reason for me to debate w... by bern on Saturday, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:04:49 AM
The subject was GREED. If this characterizes you t... by Ginger McClemons on Saturday, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:44:53 PM
Thanx Mr. Parry.  While I didn't read the who... by Suzana Megles on Friday, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:03:08 PM
If a corporation or a person continues to invest t... by bern on Saturday, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:44:25 AM