Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 7 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 2 (12 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Puny Krauthammer Ambushes a Science Giant

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Interesting 4  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 1/1/12

Become a Fan
  (30 fans)
- Advertisement -

A science genius deserves better by

Stay "til the end -- and a rich payoff of Carl Sagan's gemlike insights.  A little clean-up work first, to clear the palate.

I don't regularly read Wash. Post's Charles Krauthammer (CK, as in crank), often regret when I do, ending with gnashing teeth.  From time to time, perplexity or hilarity moves me to the dark side, hunting out the loopy logic behind he latest fringe skullduggery.  I used to read that wily conservative wordsmith, Peggy Noonan -- a far better stylist -- until I gagged at her unctuous Vatican sycophancy.  

So, I brightened suspiciously at Krauthammer's seemingly apolitical title, "Are we alone in the universe?"    Ah-ah, I guessed, are greedy oligarchs, having written off the Middle East quagmire, reigniting manifest destiny into space?  Doesn't commerce that follows expansion, like Columbus or our interminable invasions, pay back venture capital that ventures far and wide?  Imagine the military cash blast from space voyaging, as in W.'s fantasy pitch for actual Mars landings.  What overstretched empire desperate for a larger purpose wouldn't drool to conquer the moon, awarding itself an armed catbird seat to spot evildoers "from above," like gods?  

CK opens with confusion, puzzled why we haven't yet found intelligent life elsewhere despite the huge sample pool -- billions of stars, an infinity of solar systems.   I was itching to hear him pontificate about not finding intelligent life scattered across his own party's goofy field of candidates.  But no, instead the Crank posited that advanced civilizations are rare because they self-destruct, ironically killed off by their own "intelligence."  And then the shocker: he cited the hallowed authority of Carl Sagan. Sans any proof or citation.  Right, sounds just like the scientist Sagan I recall, the indefatigable founder of the whole SETI program -- the Search for Extraterrestrial Life. Why would this incredible space enthusiast waste decades and large budgets if he believed there was nothing to find?  The world's most famous scientist of his generation wrote a book called "Intelligent Life in the Universe."

Finally, out of this Krauthammer morass emerges this leap of logic, a defense of rational, life-affirming politics:


if we don't get politics right, everything else risks extinction . . . in all its grubby, grasping, corrupt, contemptible manifestations --[politics] is sovereign in human affairs. Everything ultimately rests upon it. Fairly or not, politics is the driver of history. It will determine whether we will live long enough to be heard one day. Out there. By them, the few -- the only -- who got it right.

- Advertisement -


Is this it, a covert campaign pitch, implying redemption, indeed survival, depends wholly on smarter politicians?   How can he blithely ignore a contradiction the size of Jupiter?  How can politics be "sovereign" when CK's own frantic fringe, the creeps who defy compromise on national debt or paying our bills, torpedo the process.   Where's the illusory sovereignty of politics when the right holds only contempt for unhinged, lying liberals?  How can CK evoke politics when his demented fellows play demotion derby, denigrating huge threats like global warming or worldwide pollution plus any sort of political solutions?  Right, the sovereignty of politics drowned in a bathtub.  

That dead end aside, there's more nonsense afoot, like Krauthammer's claim any search for space life "betrays a profound melancholy, a lonely species in a merciless universe [that] anxiously awaits an answering voice amid utter silence"?  Utter silence, like the key "background noise" that revealed the Big Bang?  CK whines this void of contact is "maddening" because "it makes no sense."    Wait a minute.  Doesn't scientific curiosity, not melancholy, drive our space investigations, as Sagan's illustrious career proved?  Since when is science about self-pity, not wonder or desire for knowledge?  Testing, testing, earth to CK.   

Second, considering the brevity of the SETI hunt (a few decades), the vast distances, and the rarity of the life-sustaining Goldilocks habitats, jumping to any big conclusions is absurd.  Results: not maddening, nor surprising, certainly not unexpected.  Further, our "lonely species" is maddeningly overpopulating our shrinking planet, thus dying from disease, malnutrition, and poverty.  The poorest among us aren't melancholy or anxious because no wizard found any chatty playmates lights years away, but because desperate earthlings are bereft of resources.  This supposedly "smart rightwinger" obviously skipped way too many science classes.  

Then, from bad logic he shifts to chicanery, as my research failed to establish where "Carl Sagan (among others) thought that the answer is to be found, tragically, in the final variable: the high probability that advanced civilizations destroy themselves."  Would Sagan the evidence-driven scientist make such specific predictions about absent civilizations about which no one knows anything? True, Sagan the strong critic of nuclear arms -- and the Vietnam War, plus damage to the earth -- imagined dire results for this very planet.   But he had evidence galore, even before 1996 when he died.   Readers, any help here?

- Advertisement -

CK's distortion reflects his hijacking lines from Sagan's novel, Contact , pgs. 358-360, especially fanciful dialogue between Ellie (human scientist) and the Alien, to whom she asks how his imaginary "advanced civilization" might respond to cosmic threats. 

[Ellie] "If the Nazis had taken over the world, our world, and then developed interstellar spaceflight, wouldn't you have stepped in?"

[Alien] "You'd be surprised how rarely something like that happens.  In the long run, the aggressive civilizations destroy themselves, almost always."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


Northern California, region. For a decade, Robert S. Becker's rebel-rousing essays on politics and culture analyze overall trends, messaging and frameworks, now featured author at OpEdNews, Nation of Change and RSN. He appears regularly at (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

Deadline Looms To Fund Critical Ocean Plastic-Trash Film

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It comes a time when we can't take in any more -- ... by Robert S. Becker on Sunday, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:20:02 PM
And I would not even expect CK to tackle this. ... by BFalcon on Tuesday, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:27:26 AM
for intelligent life on earth. There is a str... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:13:16 AM
screw Krauthammer. But this thing about the physic... by molly cruz on Monday, Jan 2, 2012 at 2:17:21 PM
Very good. I'm reminded of a quote that an an... by Gary Williams on Tuesday, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:02:27 PM
Sagan being proof that earth is capable of support... by conrad elledge on Monday, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:00:24 PM
"Cosmos", that I first heard of the Drake equation... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51:55 AM
Here's something relevant, though still doesn't en... by Robert S. Becker on Tuesday, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:33:39 PM
Unfortunately for mankind, those of us who se... by Gary Williams on Tuesday, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:28:40 PM
You should talk to my critics who think I go about... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:47:34 AM