Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/26/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (103 comments)

Prosecuting Bushite Crimes: It's a Genuine Dilemma

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

For years, we Americans knew –or should have known—that the Bushite regime was committing crimes of the most serious sort. These were crimes of the very kind that our Founding Fathers were most concerned to enable their descendants to prevent or to punish. Yet while the wrong-doing was exposed, it was never effectively countered. The Bushites violated the law and trampled on the Constitution with impunity, and left office by serving out their terms rather than, as our Founders would certainly have wished, by being impeached and convicted and removed.

In recent weeks, as the transfer of power to a new administration has approach, there’s been a crescendo of calls that the deep stain of these crimes now be addressed. It would be very dangerous for America's future, many say, if the clear crimes of the Bushite regime are not prosecuted. To ignore the systematic violations of law and usurpations of power of the presidency just ended, they argue, would just increase the danger that other thugs and would-be tyrants coming to power in this country, having drawn the inference that an unscrupulous president can get away with doing whatever he wants, will repeat or even extend the frightening practices of Bush's lawless administration.

I agree. All that is true, and of vital importance.

Yet, there is a genuine dilemma here. And only if we understand that dilemma are we likely to be able to help devise and execute the strategy that will best serve the future health of America’s body politic.

THE LARGER PICTURE

Dealing effectively with the terrible precedent of these crimes and usurpations is important, but this vital issue has to be seen in the larger context of the totality of the damage that the evil Bushite forces have inflicted on the nation.


These Bushites have damaged America in almost every way conceivable, but perhaps none of these ways has been more central to their overall destructive project than the fomenting of division and conflict among Americans. As I wrote, in early 2005, in a piece entitled “By Their Fruits” (at http://www.nonesoblind.org/blog/?p=81 ):
This pattern of creating division and strife is no small clue to the moral nature of this leadership. Turning people against each other –rendering the human drama into an Us against a Them—has been the practice of bad rulers throughout history.

When people are focused on their conflicts, they’re unable to build a more whole world based on their common humanity.

Bringing Americans together, then, and reducing our polarization into warring factions is a core part of healing America and protecting our common future. Just as fomenting strife is the evil leader’s way of opening the way for the destructive to prevail over the constructive, so is bringing people together an essential part of the strategy for harnessing the nation’s capacity to create good structures. When people can act on the basis of their shared values to achieve their common purposes, then the best potentialities of the nation can be realized.

Clearly, Barack Obama understands this full well. He spoke to this essential need in his campaign rhetoric. Since winning the presidential election he’s followed a path that is quite manifestly designed to reach out across the very divisions the Bushites sought to widen; he’s worked to bring as many different kinds of Americans as possible behind him to strengthen his efforts to repair and heal our damaged nation. And these efforts are making important progress.

It is this essential need to heal our divisions and to bring Americans together that combines with the need to address the Bushite crimes to create a genuine dilemma.

In an ideal America, there would be no tension between these two vital aspects of healing and repairing America.

In this ideal America, ALL Americans would recognize that the usurpations of power and the violations of law and Constitution are the most fundamental and unacceptable attack on the soul and essence of America. Everyone would recognize that the defense of the Constitution is not a liberal vs. conservative issue, not a Democrat vs. Republican issue, but an American vs. unAmerican issue. We’d all be clamoring that those who’d betrayed the public trust so profoundly be held accountable. Indeed, we’d all recognize that not only are our current public officials entitled to prosecute such crimes, they are OBLIGATED by their oath of office to do so.

But we know that we do not live in this ideal America.

We know that the forces behind the Bushites would make every effort to sell the idea that any prosecution represents some sort of “partisan” warfare, and we know that many millions of Americans are ready to buy that interpretation. We know, in other words, that as things now stand the prosecution of the Bushite crimes --whatever else it would achieve-- would strengthen in America that dark spirit of strife and division that it is so important for this nation to overcome.

What an irony, what a paradox: the very means by which, on the legal plane, we hope to strike a blow against those criminal forces of darkness would also threaten, on the plane of political dynamics, to strengthen those same dark forces.

That is the heart of the dilemma.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Andy Schmookler is running for Congress in Virginia's 6th District.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
103 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

General and particular by Mark Sashine on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:13:37 AM
agreeing in part by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:24:47 AM
part of nothing is nothing by William Whitten on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:38:41 PM
what's most important is the whole thing by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:14:38 PM
Call me an absolutist if it makes you feel better by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:35:02 PM
Yes the whole thing. by William Whitten on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:45:18 PM
Your Suggestion Doesn't Work by Joel Myron on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:13:50 AM
Your Suggestion Doesn't Work by Joel Myron on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:03:08 AM
bring america together? by jersey girl on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:08:24 PM
beyond the 20 percent by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:03:19 PM
LOL ... you crack me up ... sitting, slack jawed ... by Mr M on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:09:25 PM
Countless acts of Republican treason since 1860. by John Hanks on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:26:47 AM
I have been a Democrat until by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:57:23 PM
prosecute! by Dr. C Pen on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:51:23 AM
Some dilemma by Flak Stopper on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:32:24 AM
do I know who? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:18:43 PM
Further ... bush, cheney, dumbsfled, the whole PANC by Mr M on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:24:11 PM
Yes by Flak Stopper on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:03:09 AM
constitutional rule by G.E. Nordell on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:59:03 AM
anyone by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:22:51 PM
um, hum, and hmmm by John Tinker on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:14:07 AM
It's not complicated at all; there is no dilemma by Kevin Gosztola on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:00:44 PM
absolutely true.... indeed, by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:25:06 PM
Do we have to rely on a prosecuting prince? by Mark Adams on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:02:55 PM
dilemma? by William Whitten on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:04:33 PM
Education and exposure to the facts ends the dilemma cold. by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:14:48 PM
if by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:28:38 PM
They will have no choice. by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:33:17 PM
Bush and His Thugs MUST Be Prosecuted by Joel Myron on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:50:52 PM
Really like the way you said that.... by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:48:22 PM
You're Broadly Right, but Wrong Where it Counts by Joel Myron on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:24:25 AM
Prosecuting Bushite Crimes: It's A Genuine Dilemma by Ned A. Delaney on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:57:14 PM
The Meme that is most Disgusting by Charlie L on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:57:45 PM
Founding Fathers by Jade P. on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:21:46 PM
Don't put the cart before the horse by Paula Sayles on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:28:52 PM
There's proof by Kevin Gosztola on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:34:05 PM
The horse is hitched by William Whitten on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:14:36 PM
I agree with you, Paula by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:38:12 AM
It is so simple you choose not to see it, can't, or won't by boomerang on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:34:12 PM
delemma for who? by robert braunstein on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:54:30 PM
had to laugh by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:32:22 PM
This article is pure, 100% , unadulterated horseshit by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:57:06 PM
the connection between absolutist thinking and war-making by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:37:15 PM
you missed his point ... by Mr M on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:48:16 PM
Your conception of 'absolutist' is flawed.... by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:38:11 PM
Sex with kids by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:17:34 AM
absolutist thinking: by William Whitten on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:03:24 PM
I am tired of the Republicans Crapping in my Dog Bowl by Herbert Calhoun on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:05:35 PM
By the way by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:15:39 PM
Please email this article to your reps and tell them to read by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:28:06 PM
Bushco are internationally condemned war criminals by harold burbank on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:36:37 PM
dilemma? by jersey girl on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:51:59 PM
One thing's for sure by Oh on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:59:46 PM
BushCo by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:42:52 PM
Not a whole lot a good it's gonna do him by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:27:47 AM
Which Shall Be Repossessed by The People! by boomerang on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:36:51 PM
Top Dems Are Serious About Investigating Bush's Criminal Act by Perry Logan on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:03:49 PM
serious as slapstick by William Whitten on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:16:16 PM
there she goes again... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:51:46 AM
about Andy's ignorance? by Katrin R. on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:09:41 PM
cc: william.delahunt@mail.house.gov by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:10:28 PM
The author of this article is right by David Salaam Goldstein on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:34:48 PM
not the only! by Katrin R. on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:42:38 PM
Randi Rhodes by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:07:20 AM
You Are Exact;ly Right About Randi. by Joel Myron on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:09:53 AM
With all due respect by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:04:10 AM
I would like to see the criminals convicted... by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:16:14 PM
the global elites have indeed by richard on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:56:40 PM
hopeless? by David Salaam Goldstein on Monday, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:44:21 PM
Two Choices; by William Whitten on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:14:20 AM
You hit it. by richard on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:00:56 AM
Re: Kevin's Jonathan Turley links by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:25:26 AM
Re: Kevin's Jonathan Turley links by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:36:25 AM
sink or swim by robert braunstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:55:09 AM
Good One! by boomerang on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:15:57 PM
They killed kennedy, kennedy, king, wellstone, did 9-11... by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:24:09 AM
don't worry be sappy by robert braunstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:03:57 AM
What solutions do you have Robert? by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:46:48 AM
fight back by robert braunstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:10:11 AM
Prosecute? Who will actually do that? by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:41:35 PM
Iceland's PM just resigned; government's folding by boomerang on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:26:32 PM
Nope none of that...... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:58:46 AM
the final act? by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:10:47 AM
William, You give us conspiracy theorists a bad name by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:13:32 AM
agreed by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:18:22 AM
PS by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:19:34 AM
I didn't quite follow by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:30:25 AM
Sorry, I get sloppy sometimes by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:53:38 PM
clarification by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:02:48 PM
out of nowhere by jersey girl on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:42:57 AM
He may have been groomed (I don't believe from childhood) by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:06:14 PM
Rule of law is the rule of order by Steve Hanken on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:16:29 PM
groomed from childhood by robert braunstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:27:19 PM
'Dreams From My Father.' by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:41:44 PM
Also by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:43:59 PM
addictons? by David Salaam Goldstein on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:21:20 PM
sorry again by Katrin R. on Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:33:18 PM
the books by jersey girl on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:50:47 AM
I am sure by Katrin R. on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:31:48 PM
Read what the debunkers say by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:51:27 AM
it's not his past that bothers me by jersey girl on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:51:30 PM
I think by sommers on Thursday, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:41:30 PM
Our values need to encompass exposing criminal activity by Patrick Sinnott on Thursday, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:50:34 PM