Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 6 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (13 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Post Nuclear Japan, Pre Disaster United States

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 6 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 5   Supported 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 3/14/11

Become a Fan
  (122 fans)
- Advertisement -

Michael Collins

See interactive map at International Nuclear Safety Center

Japanese Energy and Economic Disruption

Eighty percent of Japanese energy relies on imports.  Nuclear plants provide about 30% of the electric production for the industrial base.  The loss of the Fukushima I plant, for example reduces the nuclear output by 10%, just for starters.  It also derails the big plans Japan has for nuclear power through 2050.  Over 60% of domestic needs will be met by a robust nuclear program according to one optimistic estimate.

The following graph shows the contributions electrical production:

See interactive map at International Nuclear Safety Center

- Advertisement -

Japanese Energy and Economic Disruption

Eighty percent of Japanese energy relies on imports.  Nuclear plants provide about 30% of the electric production for the industrial base.  The loss of the Fukushima I plant, for example reduces the nuclear output by 10%, just for starters.  It also derails the big plans Japan has for nuclear power through 2050.  Over 60% of domestic needs will be met by a robust nuclear program according to one optimistic estimate.

The following graph shows the contributions electrical production:

Assume a 20% loss of nuclear power production with the elimination of Fukushima's 10% contribution and other reactors that may go offline due to preemptive safety precautions.  Japan faces a near term energy shortage.  The loss of 20% of nuclear production, for example, could translate into a 6% percent reduction of overall electric production.  Hydroelectric and renewables are not capable of rising to the occasion as replacements.  That leaves thermal/fossil plants.  More imports and more pollution will go hand in hand for the next few years.  Japan will pay much more attention to the Middle East, the source of 90% crude oil imports, with less focus on planned  spread of nuclear plants.

- Advertisement -

This is speculation.  The situation may be much worse.  One thing is certain. The government regulator's confidence that "we will resolve this" seems far-fetched at best.

The damage to plant, equipment, and infrastructure led to the shut down of several automobile plants.  United States exporters will feel the impact of lower Japanese corporate revenues.  China, Japan's top trading partner, may well see the loss of investment and export opportunities.  In addition, China may have a new competitor for crude oil due to the disruption to Japan's overall energy supply system.

Still mired in the great stagnation since 1985, healthcare costs, rebuilding requirements, and the implosion of energy production  in the Fukushima Prefecture will hit the domestic economy very hard in short order.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author3863.html

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Even though human life has always been faced with ... by Ned Lud on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:44:18 AM
interestingly enough, "diablo canyon" refers to th... by msedano on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:16:14 AM
And, at the end of the day there seems few world p... by Roger on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:41:07 AM
Fact, not one person has died from radiation poiso... by Tom Stewart on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:05:00 PM
If the radiation is not that dangerous and no one ... by M_Hudson on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:43:30 AM
A revolutionary energy breakthrough has happened.A... by Mark Goldes on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:30:35 PM
I want to retract yesterday's comment defending nu... by Donald on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:42:34 PM
Pres. Obama: We don't need nuclear power. We have ... by emily horswill on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:56:33 PM
It's a good thing Canada doesn't have reactors in ... by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:45:05 AM
This is an incredibly important story and I'm send... by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:22:55 AM