Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 5   Supported 5   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 3/14/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (10 comments)

Post Nuclear Japan, Pre Disaster United States

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (57 fans)   -- Page 1 of 6 page(s)

opednews.com

Michael Collins

See interactive map at International Nuclear Safety Center

Japanese Energy and Economic Disruption

Eighty percent of Japanese energy relies on imports.  Nuclear plants provide about 30% of the electric production for the industrial base.  The loss of the Fukushima I plant, for example reduces the nuclear output by 10%, just for starters.  It also derails the big plans Japan has for nuclear power through 2050.  Over 60% of domestic needs will be met by a robust nuclear program according to one optimistic estimate.

The following graph shows the contributions electrical production:

See interactive map at International Nuclear Safety Center

Japanese Energy and Economic Disruption

Eighty percent of Japanese energy relies on imports.  Nuclear plants provide about 30% of the electric production for the industrial base.  The loss of the Fukushima I plant, for example reduces the nuclear output by 10%, just for starters.  It also derails the big plans Japan has for nuclear power through 2050.  Over 60% of domestic needs will be met by a robust nuclear program according to one optimistic estimate.

The following graph shows the contributions electrical production:

Assume a 20% loss of nuclear power production with the elimination of Fukushima's 10% contribution and other reactors that may go offline due to preemptive safety precautions.  Japan faces a near term energy shortage.  The loss of 20% of nuclear production, for example, could translate into a 6% percent reduction of overall electric production.  Hydroelectric and renewables are not capable of rising to the occasion as replacements.  That leaves thermal/fossil plants.  More imports and more pollution will go hand in hand for the next few years.  Japan will pay much more attention to the Middle East, the source of 90% crude oil imports, with less focus on planned  spread of nuclear plants.

This is speculation.  The situation may be much worse.  One thing is certain. The government regulator's confidence that "we will resolve this" seems far-fetched at best.

The damage to plant, equipment, and infrastructure led to the shut down of several automobile plants.  United States exporters will feel the impact of lower Japanese corporate revenues.  China, Japan's top trading partner, may well see the loss of investment and export opportunities.  In addition, China may have a new competitor for crude oil due to the disruption to Japan's overall energy supply system.

Still mired in the great stagnation since 1985, healthcare costs, rebuilding requirements, and the implosion of energy production  in the Fukushima Prefecture will hit the domestic economy very hard in short order.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

www.themoneyparty.org

Michael Collins is a writer in the DC area who researches and comments on the corruptions of the new millennium. His articles focus on the financial manipulations of The Money Party, the abuse of power by government, and features on elections and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

land lubbers by Ned Lud on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:44:18 AM
diablo canyon by msedano on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:16:14 AM
Good one! by Roger on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:41:07 AM
Devoid of Facts by Tom Stewart on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:05:00 PM
Has the Japanese Government over reacted then? by M_Hudson on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:43:30 AM
A Cheap Safe Alternative to Uranium Fueled Nuclear Plants by Mark Goldes on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:30:35 PM
Retraction by Donald on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:42:34 PM
We don't need nuclear power. by emily horswill on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:56:33 PM
It's a good thing Canada doesn't have reactors in BC but by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:45:05 AM
window of what? by Marta Steele on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:22:55 AM