Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  17
Share on Facebook
  10
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit
  1
Share on StumbleUpon
  15
Tell A Friend
  1
44 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

General News

Penn. Resists Voter Suppression

Become a Fan
  (25 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 8/28/12

opednews.com

VOTER SUPPRESSION MAY YET FAIL IN PENNSYLVANIA 

      By William Boardman  Email address removed"> Email address removed  

The Republican victory dance this week when Pennsylvania's controversial voter ID law survived its first court test may prove premature, since the law still faces at least three other likely legal challenges. 

The Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia has already filed an appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, seeking to reverse the August 15 decision of Judge Robert Simpson, denying an injunction to prevent the law from taking effect, while at the same time expressing some misgivings about both the statute and the legislative process that produced it.  He did not rule on the substance of the law, but issued a limited finding that it was not unconstitutional on its face. 

http://media.philly.com/documents/CMW330MD2012ApplewhiteDetermPrelimInj_081512.pdf  

Barring further impediment, the law goes into effect on September 17, well ahead of the November 6 election.   Designed by Republicans in the legislature to suppress the vote of groups more likely to vote Democratic, the law may disenfranchise more than 750,000 otherwise eligible voters from casting ballots, about ten per cent of the Pennsylvania electorate. click here;

However many voters lose their vote, Republicans think the number will be enough for them to win elections they would otherwise lose.   That's the clear meaning of the comment last June by Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, "Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."

Judge Simpson, while finding in Turzai's favor on the injunction, nevertheless felt the need to call Turzai's remarks "troubling" and "tendentious." 

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/karoli/shameless-republican-brags-about-voter-id-w  

In their appeal filed August 16, the Law Center asked the Supreme Court to hear the case on an expedited basis, before the law takes effect.  If the court accepts the proposed timeline, it well heat oral argument the week of September 10.  The Supreme Court, which currently comprises six justices, three Republicans and three Democrats, is under no obligation to hear the appeal quickly. 

http://www.whptv.com/news/local/story/An-appeal-to-the-Voter-ID-Law-has-already-been/1CtJYfD3f0uidmi4jLVjWg.cspx  

On a separate track, there's a separate lawsuit pending in Pennsylvania's second-most populous county, Allegheny, which is majority leader Turzai's home county.   In contrast to the earlier suit for an injunction on behalf of voters who would lose their right to vote, the Allegheny County challenge was brought in June by county officials.   The county executive and county controller argued that the law violates both the Pennsylvania constitution and federal laws protecting the right to vote.  That suit is still pending. 

Additionally, the county officials say the law will cost $11 million to implement, with the state paying none of it.  "So the governor is creating another unfunded mandate for all 67 counties," Allegheny county controller Chelsa Wagner said. http://plum-oakmont.patch.com/articles/allegheny-county-officials-challenge-state-voter-id-law-bfb54082?logout=true 

The third legal challenge to Pennsylvania's voter ID law comes from the U.S. Dept. of Justice, which has asked the state to respond to concerns that the partisan law discriminates against minorities.  The Justice Dept. has asked the state for data on the Pennsylvania electorate, with a deadline next week.  Depending on the analysis of the data, the Justice Dept. could file a federal lawsuit under the 1965 Voting Rights Act. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/23/us-pennsylvania-voter-idUSBRE86M1F520120723 

The partisan nature of the legislation has been clear all along, with no Democrat in the legislature voting for it.  The fact that a judge who was an elected Republican blocked the injunction has led to speculation that his decision was also partisan. 

Other than that circumstance, there's no evidence to support that suspicion, and at least one legal writer has looked at the question in detail for the Los Angeles Times and given the judge a pass. 

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-judge-voterid-pennsylvania-20120817,0,1539508.story 

Meanwhile, an umbrella group called the Pennsylvania Voter ID coalition, with 70 or  more members, has hundreds of people on the ground educating voters and helping them get valid ID, which is more complicated that one might think.  Even Governor Tom Corbett admitted he didn't know what would be a valid ID. http://www.seventy.org/Elections_Pennsylvania_Voter_ID_Coalition_Members.aspx 

And if this coalition of unions and churches and lawyers and civil rights workers and many more is successful, then even if the courts fail to intervene, maybe enough people will be able to vote and frustrate the Republican effort to tilt the election unfairly. 

So there's still a chance Pennsylvania will live up to the expectations of the state constitution's Article 1, Declaration or Rights, among them that " Elections shall be free and equal; and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage." 

http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Constitution.html 

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments