Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
May 25, 2009 at 07:45:09

Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/25/09:

Part Two, Chipping Away at the Siegelman Case with Paul Benton Weeks

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Joan Brunwasser (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Joan Brunwasser - Writer


Don Siegelman

Judicial watchdog, Missouri attorney Paul Benton Weeks is back with me for the second part of our interview. 

So, you were able to get Judge Fuller removed from your court case.  Is that the end of the story, Paul?



 I decided that in addition to having successfully removed Mark Fuller from our BASS case, that it was incumbent upon me to warn public authorities in Washington that there was a really bad fellow sitting on the federal bench in Montgomery, Alabama -- someone who was totally unsuitable to be a federal judge.  I mean, the United States Senate really dropped the ball when they let his nomination slide through their chamber.  

Truly, if our nation and the federal government had not been so focused on defending our country after 9-11, I think the US Senate and the FBI would have had more time and resources to unearth the skullduggery of Mark Fuller and he would have never been confirmed to be a federal judge.  But, because Fuller was obviously not subjected to anything more than a cursory check, the FBI gave him a "pass" and he sailed on to Senate confirmation.  I mention in my affidavit that it was clear that Fuller and Devane temporarily backed off and laid low in the middle of their scheme to defraud the RSA in order to allow nominee Mark Fuller to fly under the United States Senate's radar during the FBI's so-called background check of Mark Fuller.

So, you became pro-active. What was your plan?

Several days passed after I signed my affidavit and motion to recuse Fuller in the Murray/BASS case on July 25, 2003. It was early August 2003 when we filed the affidavit by FedEX overnight to the federal court in Ala. Then my mom, wife,and I began our 'road trip'.

We loaded up in my car with two big Kinko boxes of affidavits and we drove from Springfield, MO to DC.  We took the scenic route and when we arrived in DC on the third day, we settled into a lovely hotel near the capitol. For the next few days, my mother and wife went on various tours while I would just go into the office of each member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, speak with a staffer, and then leave a copy of my affidavit.  

What did you hope to accomplish?

I was never under any illusion that anything would happen with my leaving copies of my affidavit with officials in DC.  But, I was so firmly convinced back then that Fuller was a dangerous federal judge that I thought that whatever I could do to stop him, I should try to do. Even if it was just to leave a record for someone down the road to use in the cause of justice.  

Unfortunately, in light of Fuller's involvement in the Siegelman case, my fears proved to be well-founded. While I had known that Fuller was a dangerous partisan hack in a black federal robe, he surprised me by showing how truly dangerous he could be by his misconduct in the Siegelman case.

And what happened to that affidavit you filed in Montgomery, Alabama?

Someone told me that when he tried to get access to the court's copy of my affidavit, he was told that it was not found in a search of the public court files, although its entry into the court records was noted in the court clerk's docket sheet.  I have also heard  that my affidavit was kept separately from the Murray/BASS case files and that my affidavit may have been kept separately by Fuller.  One report I heard even suggested that my affidavit was kept by Fuller in his office.  

What would be the significance of Fuller keeping the affidavit in his office?

Of course, Fuller wanted to keep my affidavit from the public.  That's why a full investigation of his courthouse is in order and a complete investigation of how my affidavit was kept in his courthouse since its filing is critical to determine whether Messrs. Scrushy and Siegelman were purposefully and illegally denied public access to evidence (my affidavit) of how inappropriate Fuller was to: (1) sit as a judge in ANY case; and (2) especially inappropriate to sit in any case involving someone like Don Siegelman who appointed the public official [former Judge Gary McAliley] who went after Fuller after Fuller became a federal judge and who supported the assertions in my affidavit that Fuller was a LIAR and a CROOK.

Now what?

To be blunt, I do not believe that I was put on this earth to pursue Mark Fuller and I don't intend to do so.  That is the job of the public authorities.  I have done my part to alert the public to what I firmly believe is a dangerous and unfit man who is occupying a federal judicial position.  

Fuller truly sees partisan politics as permanent and continual war; he was just doing his part as a soldier in his political party, in terms of 'taking out' a political opponent.  To those who know how Fuller operates and thinks, it is simply not in Fuller's DNA to remove politics from his decisions and behavior while sitting on the federal bench.  For Fuller, every aspect of public office is there to seize in pursuit of political and personal gain - period, end of sentence.  He proved that in how he abused and ran into the ground his DAs office in Pike and Coffee Counties.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which exists for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Attorney General Eric Holder"
Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, in Barack Obama Administration, vs. George Bush. Holder V. Bush. Torture and the Attorney General's Moment of Truth.
by U.S. Attorney Journal, in Barack Obama Administration, vs. George Bush. Holder V. Bush. Torture and the Attorney General's Moment of Truth. Eric Holder

$4.99

Number of pages:
Publisher:

Addresses
by Eric Holder


Number of pages:
Publisher: U.S. Dept. of Justice

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE by mssarnhatt on Monday, May 25, 2009 at 9:31:03 AM
America's Number One Political Prisoner by Joan Brunwasser on Monday, May 25, 2009 at 9:39:33 AM
It's outrageous but not shocking by Patrick Lafferty on Monday, May 25, 2009 at 12:04:56 PM
Agreed by mark pommett on Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 2:17:10 AM
I wonder what Eric Holder is waiting for... by John R Moffett on Monday, May 25, 2009 at 2:50:04 PM
that's the $64,000 question, isn't it? by Joan Brunwasser on Monday, May 25, 2009 at 3:36:05 PM
Here is a problem that I am seeing... by The Old Codger on Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 12:21:11 AM
hence the links by Joan Brunwasser on Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 6:05:34 AM
Allegations and connections that by Patrick Lafferty on Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 9:03:44 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum