OpEdNews Op Eds

Oil Shale's Time Has Not Come

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/7/09

Oil shale is horribly destructive. It will poison ground water and rivers and kill human beings and wildlife in a terribly inefficient effort to wring the last few drops of petroleum out of our continent. But how will you convince your Uncle Ed that "drill, baby, drill" is dumb natural resource management? Here are a few ideas.

First, I don't think this is the time to resort to these extremely dangerous and difficult resources. If we were without other alternatives for oil and at war and under siege, perhaps we could justify going after oil shale on the basis of simple survival--if we would die individually or as a nation without it, maybe it would be worth the sacrifices involved.

I think this is a good argument for keeping oil shale buried: at some point the survival of the nation might depend on these resources of last resort. If we use up the resources now, they will not be there when we need them.

This is an argument designed to appeal to millennialists and conservatives in particular.

Second, the technology for recovery of shale and tar sands is monstrous. I don't think we have identified the best way to access this resource. I suspect that we might, at some point in the future, employ bacteria to pull the petroleum out of the rock. We might be able to use fusion-powered robot lasers to heat the rocks and simultaneously drill the needed holes to pull the oil out as the heat causes it to emerge from the rock. If we go forward now, with explosives and rock drills, using miners and very wasteful processes like excavation above and below a section of oil shale--above to drill the holes and to set the explosives, and below to recover the oil that drains out of the shattered and heated rock--to get a small percentage of the oil out of the shale, we will be wasting much of the resource just in recovering it. Many technologies lie on the horizon that would allow us to access the oil more efficiently as it is needed.

This is an argument designed to appeal to someone like Newt Gingrich--a technophile science fiction nut (the right is full of them--they often masquerade as libertarians) who is able to look forward with glee to a future with flying cars and two-way wrist radios. Accepting this argument will allow them to be wide-eyed with their vision of the future with plentiful petroleum and fusion robot lasers turning oily rock into a fountain of rocky oil.

Both of these arguments seem to concede that we will access this resource at some point--but the technologies necessary to go after the oil will themselves be useful in supplanting oil as a fuel. Bacteria can be used to gather oil out of shale or tar sand, but they can also be used to separate hydrogen from oxygen to make a clean and cheap fuel wherever there is water available. Fusion lasers, if they are ever actually developed, could be used to generate and distribute the energy we now create by burning petroleum and electrical distribution over wires. And fusion-powered robots could simply carry us in their arms or a specially made adult-size snuggli from point to point, eliminating the need for cars.

These arguments are constructed to appeal to two large groups of individual conservatives likely to be on the forefront of the move to extract oil shale.

It's important to remember that any oil pulled out of the shale will most likely go to the highest bidder and won't remain here on US soil. Even now, we export most of the oil pumped on US soil. We will probably be rivers and vast amounts of scarce ground water in order to let Chinese people can drive larger domestic cars. Even right wingers who dearly love oil and the devastation wrought by the extraction industry might react to this line of argument because they hate the Chinese, either because they look different from caucasians, or because their skin is slightly darker than caucasian skin, or because they are commies. Throw in the word "chicom"--a contraction of "Chinese communist" common in the 1950s and 60s and still commonly used among a particular circle of pea brained neo-McCarthyites even those right wingers who have learned not to display their essential racism can't resist being goaded by the "c" word.

Contact the Bureau of Land Management and tell them how you feel about oil shale mining: click here

 

Adherent to the cowboy way, eschewer of four-letter words and dental care, founder of the hippie movement, and failed prospector, Gabby Hayes can be counted upon to point and say, "They went thataway," and to develop plans to cut them off at the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Reflection on recent US-Iranian history

Why Obama Is Driving Us All Crazy

Why I Am a Liberal (for Eric Alterman)

Oil Shale's Time Has Not Come

Why Are the Media So Irresponsible?

The $5 Bailout

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As someone who grew  up in Northeastern Wyomi... by Margaret Bassett on Sunday, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:39:02 PM
You hit the nail on the head. Thinking only of the... by gabby hayes on Tuesday, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:12:35 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum