Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 8   Must Read 6   News 5   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/1/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (12 comments)

Obama Proposes a Wretched Nominee for Controversial U.S. Attorney Post

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (34 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Cross Posted at Legal Schnauzer

Just when you think the Obama administration's performance on justice issues in Alabama can't get any worse . . . it does.

Now we know why Obama waited more than two years to nominate a replacement for Bush appointee Leura Canary in the Middle District of Alabama. He apparently planned to nominate someone who is almost as bad as she is . . . so, why rush it?

George Beck, from the Montgomery firm of Capell and Howard, is the administration's choice, according to a press release issued yesterday. Sources tell Legal Schnauzer that the White House would have needed to strive awfully hard to come up with a worse choice than Beck. The Alabama Democratic Party issued a statement supporting the nomination, which speaks volumes about why Democrats can't win a statewide race in "The Heart of Dixie" to save their souls.

How bad a choice is Beck? Consider a post we wrote on January 7, 2010, which described a possible Beck nomination as a "train wreck."

What do you really need to know about George Beck? Two things:

* His firm has been known as a base of operations for GOP strategist Karl Rove when he comes to Alabama;

* He represented Nick Baily, the government's star witness in the Don Siegelman case, and allowed prosecutors to browbeat Baily and interview him more than 70 times, including what appears to be blatant coaching.

We outlined the case against Beck in a post from more than a year ago, titled "Is Obama About to Make a Terrible Nomination in Alabama?" Unfortunately, we now know the answer is yes.

We can think of only one explanation for the Beck nomination: Centrist Alabama Democrats, the ones who apparently are in charge of a sinking ship, have decided that Don Siegelman is political kryptonite and they want to distance themselves from him, his case, and his supporters. The centrists seem to be saying, "Hey, maybe the Bush Justice Department was right about Siegelman, so we need to nominate a man whose pathetic representation of a key witness allowed the government to get a conviction."

The White House seems to be saying, "Yeah, that's change we can believe in!"

Never mind that anyone with any knowledge of the facts and the law knows that Siegelman and codefendant Richard Scrushy were railroaded. Never mind that Don Siegelman remains an immensely popular figure among progressives, both in Alabama and nationwide. Never mind that numerous respected individuals in the press and the legal field have stated that the prosecution was without merit. Never mind that Don Siegelman is pretty much the only Democrat remaining who has shown he has a clue about  consistently winning statewide races in Alabama.

With George Beck in office, the Republicans who have turned Montgomery, Alabama, into one of the nation's worst political sewers can rest assured that they will never be held accountable. And the Beck nomination represents Alabama Democrats essentially dragging a sharp razor across their own wrists. Death by massive bleeding shouldn't take long.

As for Obama, the Beck nomination might be a warning sign that he is going to have major problems in 2012.

[Photo: rootswire.org]

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I live in Birmingham, Alabama, and work in higher education. I became interested in justice-related issues after experiencing gross judicial corruption in Alabama state courts. This corruption has a strong political component. The corrupt judges are (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Obama by liberalsrock on Saturday, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:10:22 AM
Why, W stole TWO elections.... by Jill Herendeen on Saturday, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:37:08 PM
Great article - "valuable by Michael Collins on Saturday, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:59:00 AM
My question is by Archie on Saturday, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:45:03 PM
A look at that face should say no by Mike Preston on Saturday, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:44:21 PM
Too scary for words by Mari Eliza on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:35:41 PM
How appropriate! April Fools by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:50:27 PM
Oh, how do you know that a prosecutor is a crook, just by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:58:37 PM
If you want to know how we were supposed to be able by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:01:35 PM
A contract for law enforcement between the police/people by manifesto 2000 on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:02:03 AM
Push for restoration of grand juries and the right to by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:17:25 PM
History of Citizens' Grand Juries by manifesto 2000 on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:12:24 PM