OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Vowed To Support Filibuster of Telecom Immunity Bill

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

Obama recently issued a statement that the "compromise" FISA bill had to be passed to ensure our safety, despite the fact that it included immunity for telecoms. Telco immunity has been opposed by a majority of Americans in national polls since January.

But Obama's spokesman, Bill Burton, back in September, vowed that Obama would "support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies." So we need to know how Obama suddenly would condone retroactive lawbreaking. You can email Mr. Burton here to ask that Obama keep his commitment firm against telecom amnesty:

bburton@barackobama.com

Also be sure to let your Member of Congress know you're watching how they voted. My Congressman, Eliot "Lieberman Lite" Engel again stuck his wagon to George Bush on this one, all but begging to be unseated in November. See how Congress voted here.

Here's what I wrote to Obama's spokesman:

Dear Mr. Burton,


I have been a strong Obama supporter so far. I am an active political blogger and I cannot fathom or stomach that Mr. Obama just gave immunity to telecoms.

I agree with the many Constitutional scholars including Johnathan Turley who saw existing FISA laws sufficient to ensure the safety of Americans. The eavesdropping done as part of Bush's NSA program should be adjudicated in the courts, who have ruled the program illegal already.

The Democratic cave-in we just saw has angered and energized large swaths of the blogosphere. The most reprehensible part is that it signals Democratic weakness and fear: even with the law and Constitution on their side, the Democratic leadership has endorsed these crimes instead of prosecuting them. In doing so, they become complicit themselves and this is not missed on the public.

There is no doubt that Obama's quest for the White House will result in a dramatic showdown with the former administration. I can understand why Obama wants to delay this, but eventually "Mr. Change" will need to define what change actually means. Mr. Obama should not be fearful in taking an aggressive stand against lawbreaking by the Bush administration.

I feel Obama's ethics-reform stances are the basis for his support by Americans who strongly disapprove of President Bush, but disapprove of the current Congress even more. It smells like fear, Mr. Burton. I would appreciate a response for OpEd News.

UPDATE: It has been correctly brought out that Obama's statement did specify he'd support a filibuster of telco immunity. This statement was made in the context of Sen. Chris Dodd's good work on the issue last fall.

Strategy-wise, I'd say Obama was choosing not to proactively assemble the filibuster himself for this "line item" because it would distract from his larger 50-state campaign itinerary, become a lightning rod for criticism on an issue many voters do not fully comprehend, and perhaps make him seem un-presidential in doing a "Senators" work at this point.

There must be an eventual showdown between Bush's years of Constitutional violations and an incoming Obama administration. This means Obama should already be ruminating about an Attorney General and an articulated position on impeachment, the mother of all investigations to rule them all and bind them.

Avoiding this is to Obama's benefit for now, but the spineless Democrats are not making it easy as Bush tries to walk off with the store. So many have hammered Obama on the telco immunity issue and as we were waiting to see if the problem could be mitigated, we see this from today's Politico:

Senate Democratic aides said that Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) may introduce an amendment striking the provision, though it appears highly unlikely the amendment would get the 60-votes necessary to pass.

A cloture vote on the housing bill is set for Tuesday morning, while Senate Democratic aides said the FISA vote could come as early as Wednesday.

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

Trending on the Web

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 people are discussing this page, with 19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

recognized that this was an immense (& likely&... by Richard Mynick on Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 at 1:08:39 PM
He would not be reversing himself if he fought to ... by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:56:22 PM
He has us over a barrel.  We have 2 choices, ... by pft on Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:41:07 PM
Dear Mr. Burton:You know as well as I do that the ... by JonmarkP on Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:54:31 PM
You really trust Obama?... by Gallaher on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:28:36 AM
Before you seemed politically advantageous for him... by Bill Samuel on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:43:07 AM
IN 2000 ELECTION WE THOUGH THERE WAS SOMETHING FIS... by RICH SHA on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:06:10 AM
public campaign financing, it appears the only thi... by Richard Wise on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:40:25 AM
I wasn't aware of Sen. Obama's pledge but,... by Mark Welkie on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:34:48 AM
This is a question of either keeping one's wor... by Michael Shaw on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:37:51 AM
Dear Mr. Burton, As a lifelong democrat and suppo... by Michael Shaw on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:29:44 AM
 BUT WE ONLY GET TWO GLOBAL ELITE PAWNS TO PI... by RICH SHA on Tuesday, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:40:09 AM
my flip flop comment wasn't aimed at you. I ag... by Michael Shaw on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:43:36 AM
Forget all this writing and petitioning and bewail... by ed kriner on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:42:18 AM
I understand your anger, but lets not forget those... by Michael Shaw on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:01:32 AM
I suspect Obama is just another trojan horse. Once... by Thomas Mc on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:43:04 AM
I just called Obama's office at 5pm EDT. ... by David Block on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:22:56 PM
Several months ago during a vote on immunity for t... by Laura Kay on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:50:49 PM
While it's nice to be among like-minded souls,... by Gustav Wynn on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:51:50 PM