Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  2
Share on Facebook
  4
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  1
7 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Nothing New Under the Sun

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Funny 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 1/26/14

opednews.com

Source: Gush Shalom


(image by new world notes)

DURING THE last hundred years, Russia has undergone huge changes.

At the beginning, it was ruled by the Czar, in an absolute monarchy with some democratic decorations, a "tyranny mitigated by inefficiency."

After the downfall of the Czar, a liberal and equally inefficient regime ruled for a few months, when it was overthrown by the Bolshevik revolution.

The "dictatorship of the proletariat" lasted for some 73 years, which means that three generations passed through the Soviet education system. That should have been enough to absorb the values of internationalism, socialism and human dignity, as taught by Karl Marx.

The Soviet system imploded in 1991, leaving few political traces behind. After a few years of liberal anarchy under Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin took over. He has proved himself to be an able statesman, making Russia into a world power again. He has also instituted a new autocratic system, clamping down on democracy and human rights.

When we view these events, spanning a century, we are obliged to conclude that after undergoing all these dramatic upheavals Russia is politically more or less where it started. The difference between the realm of Czar Nicholas II and President Putin I is minimal. The national aspirations, the general outlook, the regime and the status of human rights are more or less the same.

What does that teach us? For me it means that there is something like a national character, which does not change easily, if at all. Revolutions, wars, disasters come and go, and the basic character of a people remains as it was.

LET US take another example, closer to us geographically: Turkey.

Mustafa Kemal was a fascinating person. People who met him when, as an officer in the Ottoman army, he was serving in Palestine, described him as an interesting character and a heavy drinker. He was born in Thessaloniki in Greece, a town which was mostly Jewish at the time, and took part in the revolution of the Young Turk movement, which aimed at the renovation of the Ottoman Empire, which had become the "sick man of Europe."

After the Turkish defeat in World War I, Mustafa Kemal set out to create a new Turkey. His reforms were very far-reaching. Among others, he abolished the Ottoman Empire and the ancient Muslim Caliphate, changed the script of the Turkish language from Arabic to Latin, pushed religion out of politics, turned the army into "the guardian of the (secular) republic," forbade men and women to wear traditional dress like the fez and the hijab. His ambition was to turn Turkey into a modern European country.

In 1934, when the surname law was adopted, the national parliament gave him the name "Atatürk" (Father of Turks). The people adore him to this day. His picture hangs in all government offices. Yet now we witness the reversal of most of his reforms.

Turkey is today ruled by a religious Islamic party, voted in by the people. Islam is making a major comeback. After staging several coups, the army has been pushed out of politics. The present leadership is accused by some of neo-Ottoman policies.

Does this mean that Turkey is returning to where it was a hundred years ago?

ONE CAN cite examples from all over the world.

Some 220 years after the mother of all modern revolutions, the Great French Revolution, the frivolous adventures of the present French president are being compared to those of the Bourbon kings. Nothing much has remained from the times of the austere Charles de Gaulle, neither morally nor politically.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Gush

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"Stupid and Mean and Brutal"

Israeli Idiocracy

The Tone and the Music; Reaction to Obama's Cairo Speech

A Flash of Lightning

The Grand Default

Bibi and the Yo-Yos

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I dont believe it. The US, China, and Europe are ... by Paul Easton on Sunday, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:05:22 AM
Soon we will all be the same. Starving dogs fight... by Paul Easton on Sunday, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:31:09 AM
Like Buddhism; Judaism demands self-motivation an... by molly cruz on Sunday, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:18:49 PM
Uri craftily distorts the truth- Israel was creat... by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:57:16 PM
I can see this, that unless Israel starts to treat... by Michael Dewey on Sunday, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:22:16 PM
All nations are conveniences, functional expressio... by molly cruz on Monday, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:00:23 AM
Well, if Israel wants to continue to claim to be A... by Michael Dewey on Monday, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:57:28 AM
All nations are conveniences, functional expressio... by molly cruz on Monday, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:03:14 AM